促进家长/护理人员管理和控制儿童哮喘自我效能的教育干预:随机临床试验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s10995-024-03987-3
Elizamar Regina da Rocha Mendes, Kamila Ferreira Lima, Ana Lúcia Araújo Gomes, Emanuella Silva Joventino Melo, Paulo César de Almeida, Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima, Leidiane Minervina Moraes de Sabino, Jardeliny Corrêa da Penha, Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa
{"title":"促进家长/护理人员管理和控制儿童哮喘自我效能的教育干预:随机临床试验。","authors":"Elizamar Regina da Rocha Mendes, Kamila Ferreira Lima, Ana Lúcia Araújo Gomes, Emanuella Silva Joventino Melo, Paulo César de Almeida, Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima, Leidiane Minervina Moraes de Sabino, Jardeliny Corrêa da Penha, Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa","doi":"10.1007/s10995-024-03987-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization and morbidity, necessitating the development of educational interventions for its management and control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention in promoting parent/caregiver self-efficacy in the management and control of their children's asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical trial was conducted in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, involving two randomized groups of parents/caregivers of children: the comparison group (CG) (n = 42) and the intervention group (IG) (n = 42). Data collection took place in two phases: the first included face-to-face sessions followed by the educational intervention in the IG, and the second included telephone follow-up. The educational intervention included the use of an educational booklet and a brief motivational interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups were homogeneous at baseline. After the intervention, the mean self-efficacy scores of the IG were significantly higher than those of the CG (p < 0.05), and children whose parents/caregivers were in the CG were 1.43 times more likely to experience an asthma crisis than those in the IG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The educational intervention proved effective in increasing parent/caregiver self-efficacy in asthma management and control. Furthermore, children whose parents/caregivers did not receive the educational intervention were more likely to experience an asthma crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2115-2125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Intervention to Promote Parent/Caregiver Self-Efficacy in the Management and Control of Childhood Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elizamar Regina da Rocha Mendes, Kamila Ferreira Lima, Ana Lúcia Araújo Gomes, Emanuella Silva Joventino Melo, Paulo César de Almeida, Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima, Leidiane Minervina Moraes de Sabino, Jardeliny Corrêa da Penha, Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-024-03987-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization and morbidity, necessitating the development of educational interventions for its management and control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention in promoting parent/caregiver self-efficacy in the management and control of their children's asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical trial was conducted in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, involving two randomized groups of parents/caregivers of children: the comparison group (CG) (n = 42) and the intervention group (IG) (n = 42). Data collection took place in two phases: the first included face-to-face sessions followed by the educational intervention in the IG, and the second included telephone follow-up. The educational intervention included the use of an educational booklet and a brief motivational interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups were homogeneous at baseline. After the intervention, the mean self-efficacy scores of the IG were significantly higher than those of the CG (p < 0.05), and children whose parents/caregivers were in the CG were 1.43 times more likely to experience an asthma crisis than those in the IG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The educational intervention proved effective in increasing parent/caregiver self-efficacy in asthma management and control. Furthermore, children whose parents/caregivers did not receive the educational intervention were more likely to experience an asthma crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2115-2125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-03987-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-03987-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:哮喘是导致儿童住院和发病的主要原因:哮喘是导致儿科住院和发病的主要原因,因此有必要制定管理和控制哮喘的教育干预措施:目的:评估一项教育干预措施在提高家长/护理人员管理和控制子女哮喘的自我效能方面的效果:方法: 在巴西塞阿拉州福塔莱萨市开展了一项临床试验,试验涉及两组随机分组的儿童家长/监护人:对比组(CG)(42 人)和干预组(IG)(42 人)。数据收集分两个阶段进行:第一阶段包括面对面交流,然后在干预组进行教育干预;第二阶段包括电话随访。教育干预包括使用教育手册和简短的动机访谈:结果:各组基线数据相同。干预后,IG 组的平均自我效能感得分明显高于 CG 组(p 结论:IG 组的自我效能感得分明显高于 CG 组:事实证明,教育干预能有效提高家长/护理人员在哮喘管理和控制方面的自我效能。此外,未接受教育干预的父母/照顾者的孩子更有可能出现哮喘危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational Intervention to Promote Parent/Caregiver Self-Efficacy in the Management and Control of Childhood Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Asthma is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization and morbidity, necessitating the development of educational interventions for its management and control.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention in promoting parent/caregiver self-efficacy in the management and control of their children's asthma.

Methods: A clinical trial was conducted in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, involving two randomized groups of parents/caregivers of children: the comparison group (CG) (n = 42) and the intervention group (IG) (n = 42). Data collection took place in two phases: the first included face-to-face sessions followed by the educational intervention in the IG, and the second included telephone follow-up. The educational intervention included the use of an educational booklet and a brief motivational interview.

Results: The groups were homogeneous at baseline. After the intervention, the mean self-efficacy scores of the IG were significantly higher than those of the CG (p < 0.05), and children whose parents/caregivers were in the CG were 1.43 times more likely to experience an asthma crisis than those in the IG.

Conclusions: The educational intervention proved effective in increasing parent/caregiver self-efficacy in asthma management and control. Furthermore, children whose parents/caregivers did not receive the educational intervention were more likely to experience an asthma crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信