患者对调整协作护理治疗阿片类药物使用障碍伴抑郁和/或创伤后应激障碍的看法。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Isabel M Leamon, Vanessa Jacobsohn, Alex R Dopp, Grace Hindmarch, Venice Ceballos, Miriam Komaromy, Katherine E Watkins, Karen Chan Osilla
{"title":"患者对调整协作护理治疗阿片类药物使用障碍伴抑郁和/或创伤后应激障碍的看法。","authors":"Isabel M Leamon, Vanessa Jacobsohn, Alex R Dopp, Grace Hindmarch, Venice Ceballos, Miriam Komaromy, Katherine E Watkins, Karen Chan Osilla","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with opioid use disorder and cooccurring mental health concerns experience heightened consequences and lower rates of treatment access. Engaging patients as research partners alongside health systems is critical for tailoring care for this population. Collaborative care is promising for the treatment of co-occurring disordersObjectives: We used a community-participatory partnered research1 approach to partner with patients, providers, and clinic administrators to adapt and implement a collaborative care intervention for co-occurring disorders in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative interviews with patients to assess their feedback on the proposed collaborative care model before intervention implementation. A first round of interviews was conducted to obtain patient feedback on our adaptation ideas (n = 11). The team then incorporated these suggestions, beta-tested the intervention with participants (n = 9), and assessed participant feedback. Data were analyzed using rapid content analysis and then implemented by health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient feedback underscored the need for the care coordinator (CC) to be trained in patient engagement and stigma reduction and to provide assistance around socioeconomic barriers and relapse. Patients shared that it was helpful to have the CC address co-occurring disorders, emphasized the need for the CC to be flexible, and expressed that tele-health was acceptable. Patient feedback was integrated in subsequent CC training with health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present research demonstrates the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating patient perspectives into treatment design and implementation in health systems using community-participatory partnered research .</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 3","pages":"309-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perspectives on Adapting Collaborative Care for Opioid Use Disorder With Depression and/or Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel M Leamon, Vanessa Jacobsohn, Alex R Dopp, Grace Hindmarch, Venice Ceballos, Miriam Komaromy, Katherine E Watkins, Karen Chan Osilla\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with opioid use disorder and cooccurring mental health concerns experience heightened consequences and lower rates of treatment access. Engaging patients as research partners alongside health systems is critical for tailoring care for this population. Collaborative care is promising for the treatment of co-occurring disordersObjectives: We used a community-participatory partnered research1 approach to partner with patients, providers, and clinic administrators to adapt and implement a collaborative care intervention for co-occurring disorders in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative interviews with patients to assess their feedback on the proposed collaborative care model before intervention implementation. A first round of interviews was conducted to obtain patient feedback on our adaptation ideas (n = 11). The team then incorporated these suggestions, beta-tested the intervention with participants (n = 9), and assessed participant feedback. Data were analyzed using rapid content analysis and then implemented by health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient feedback underscored the need for the care coordinator (CC) to be trained in patient engagement and stigma reduction and to provide assistance around socioeconomic barriers and relapse. Patients shared that it was helpful to have the CC address co-occurring disorders, emphasized the need for the CC to be flexible, and expressed that tele-health was acceptable. Patient feedback was integrated in subsequent CC training with health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present research demonstrates the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating patient perspectives into treatment design and implementation in health systems using community-participatory partnered research .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"309-321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有阿片类药物使用障碍并同时伴有精神健康问题的人,其后果更加严重,获得治疗的比例也更低。让患者作为研究伙伴与医疗系统一起参与,对于为这一人群量身定制治疗方案至关重要。合作护理在治疗共发疾病方面前景广阔目标:我们采用社区参与式合作研究1 的方法,与患者、医疗服务提供者和诊所管理者合作,在初级医疗中调整并实施针对共存障碍的合作护理干预措施:方法:我们对患者进行了定性访谈,以评估他们在干预措施实施前对建议的合作护理模式的反馈意见。我们进行了第一轮访谈,以获得患者对我们的调整意见(n = 11)的反馈。然后,团队采纳了这些建议,对参与者(9 人)进行了干预测试,并评估了参与者的反馈意见。采用快速内容分析法对数据进行分析,然后由医疗系统实施:患者反馈强调,护理协调员(CC)需要接受患者参与和减少污名化方面的培训,并在社会经济障碍和复发方面提供帮助。患者认为让护理协调员处理并发症很有帮助,强调护理协调员需要具有灵活性,并表示远程医疗是可以接受的。患者的反馈意见被纳入了随后与医疗系统开展的CC培训中:本研究表明,利用社区参与式合作研究将患者观点纳入医疗系统的治疗设计和实施是可行和有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Perspectives on Adapting Collaborative Care for Opioid Use Disorder With Depression and/or Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.

Background: Individuals with opioid use disorder and cooccurring mental health concerns experience heightened consequences and lower rates of treatment access. Engaging patients as research partners alongside health systems is critical for tailoring care for this population. Collaborative care is promising for the treatment of co-occurring disordersObjectives: We used a community-participatory partnered research1 approach to partner with patients, providers, and clinic administrators to adapt and implement a collaborative care intervention for co-occurring disorders in primary care.

Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients to assess their feedback on the proposed collaborative care model before intervention implementation. A first round of interviews was conducted to obtain patient feedback on our adaptation ideas (n = 11). The team then incorporated these suggestions, beta-tested the intervention with participants (n = 9), and assessed participant feedback. Data were analyzed using rapid content analysis and then implemented by health systems.

Results: Patient feedback underscored the need for the care coordinator (CC) to be trained in patient engagement and stigma reduction and to provide assistance around socioeconomic barriers and relapse. Patients shared that it was helpful to have the CC address co-occurring disorders, emphasized the need for the CC to be flexible, and expressed that tele-health was acceptable. Patient feedback was integrated in subsequent CC training with health systems.

Conclusions: The present research demonstrates the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating patient perspectives into treatment design and implementation in health systems using community-participatory partnered research .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信