改善镰状细胞病患者的生活:社区组织与流行病学家携手合作。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amanda J Young, Amanda Maresh, Shammara Pope, Rae Blaylark, Sangeetha Lakshmanan, L'Oreal Stephens, Rebecca Aderojou, Emily Meier, Gary Gibson, Amanda Okolo, Shamaree Cromartie, Niani Coker, Susan Paulukonis, Jennifer Fields, Mandip Kaur, Jay Desai
{"title":"改善镰状细胞病患者的生活:社区组织与流行病学家携手合作。","authors":"Amanda J Young, Amanda Maresh, Shammara Pope, Rae Blaylark, Sangeetha Lakshmanan, L'Oreal Stephens, Rebecca Aderojou, Emily Meier, Gary Gibson, Amanda Okolo, Shamaree Cromartie, Niani Coker, Susan Paulukonis, Jennifer Fields, Mandip Kaur, Jay Desai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Sickle Cell Data Collection (SCDC) program comprises multidisciplinary teams, which include community-based organizations. Partnering with community-based organizations (CBOs) is a novel approach to ensure that SCDC data are actionable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand areas for mutual capacity building, we explored the relationships and dynamics between CBO and data teams within the SCDC program in 10 states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with CBO (n = 13) and SCDC (n = 10) participants and then categorized and compared text from each interview and across states. Six themes emerged.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Transparency and trust are essential. Early CBO engagement and leadership are needed for trust and agreed upon priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants contextualized trust, the most prominent theme, within discussions of racism and health inequities. Relationships between the CBO and data teams bring hard data and human experience together for advocacy, education, improved care, and a platform for the SCD voice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 3","pages":"371-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Lives of People with Sickle Cell Disease: Community Organizations and Epidemiologists Working Together.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda J Young, Amanda Maresh, Shammara Pope, Rae Blaylark, Sangeetha Lakshmanan, L'Oreal Stephens, Rebecca Aderojou, Emily Meier, Gary Gibson, Amanda Okolo, Shamaree Cromartie, Niani Coker, Susan Paulukonis, Jennifer Fields, Mandip Kaur, Jay Desai\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Sickle Cell Data Collection (SCDC) program comprises multidisciplinary teams, which include community-based organizations. Partnering with community-based organizations (CBOs) is a novel approach to ensure that SCDC data are actionable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand areas for mutual capacity building, we explored the relationships and dynamics between CBO and data teams within the SCDC program in 10 states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with CBO (n = 13) and SCDC (n = 10) participants and then categorized and compared text from each interview and across states. Six themes emerged.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Transparency and trust are essential. Early CBO engagement and leadership are needed for trust and agreed upon priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants contextualized trust, the most prominent theme, within discussions of racism and health inequities. Relationships between the CBO and data teams bring hard data and human experience together for advocacy, education, improved care, and a platform for the SCD voice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"371-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国疾病控制与预防中心的镰状细胞数据收集(SCDC)项目由多学科团队组成,其中包括社区组织。与社区组织(CBO)合作是确保 SCDC 数据具有可操作性的一种新方法:为了更好地了解双方能力建设的领域,我们探讨了 10 个州的 SCDC 项目中 CBO 与数据团队之间的关系和动态:我们对 CBO(n = 13)和 SCDC(n = 10)的参与者进行了半结构化访谈,然后对每次访谈和各州的访谈内容进行了分类和比较。得出了六个主题:透明度和信任至关重要。需要社区组织的早期参与和领导,以建立信任并就优先事项达成一致:参与者在讨论种族主义和健康不平等问题时,将信任这一最突出的主题与背景联系起来。社区组织和数据团队之间的关系将硬数据和人类经验结合在一起,以促进宣传、教育、改善护理,并为 SCD 提供发言平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Lives of People with Sickle Cell Disease: Community Organizations and Epidemiologists Working Together.

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Sickle Cell Data Collection (SCDC) program comprises multidisciplinary teams, which include community-based organizations. Partnering with community-based organizations (CBOs) is a novel approach to ensure that SCDC data are actionable.

Objective: To better understand areas for mutual capacity building, we explored the relationships and dynamics between CBO and data teams within the SCDC program in 10 states.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with CBO (n = 13) and SCDC (n = 10) participants and then categorized and compared text from each interview and across states. Six themes emerged.

Lessons learned: Transparency and trust are essential. Early CBO engagement and leadership are needed for trust and agreed upon priorities.

Conclusions: Participants contextualized trust, the most prominent theme, within discussions of racism and health inequities. Relationships between the CBO and data teams bring hard data and human experience together for advocacy, education, improved care, and a platform for the SCD voice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信