甲状腺细胞学概念的演变。

Q2 Medicine
N. Paul Ohori MD
{"title":"甲状腺细胞学概念的演变。","authors":"N. Paul Ohori MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2024.08.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concepts in thyroid diagnostics are evolving. As cytopathologists, we benefit from understanding the changes taking place in cytopathology practice as well as intersecting areas that may have implications for us. In this review, we discuss recent changes to 1. Classification systems, 2. Ancillary molecular testing modalities, and 3. Key metrics that affect thyroid cytopathology. The recent World Health Organization, Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology, and American Joint Committee on Cancer classification systems have aspects that are designed to harmonize the clinical, cytopathologic, histomorphologic, and molecular findings for improved communication and patient management. New terminologies such as thyroid follicular nodular disease and low-risk follicular cell-derived thyroid neoplasms are introduced to reflect the subtle biologic nuances involving benign non-neoplastic and low-grade neoplastic conditions. The Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology System has simplified its terminology, updated risk of malignancy estimates, and expanded the discussions on molecular testing, clinical and imaging assessments, and pediatric cytopathology. There is now a single term for each of the 6 diagnostic categories. The American Joint Committee on Cancer has refined the staging criteria to provide improved stratification of patient prognostication. Molecular testing using next-generation technology now offers large panels of markers that are sensitive for detecting the wide range of thyroid neoplasms. These panels were developed in North America and whether other regions of the world will choose similar tests remain to be seen. Finally, metrics such as molecular-derived risk of malignancy and molecular risk group may be viewed as surrogates of resection information and used to complement diagnostics, management, and quality assurance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Pages 389-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving concepts in thyroid cytology\",\"authors\":\"N. Paul Ohori MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasc.2024.08.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Concepts in thyroid diagnostics are evolving. As cytopathologists, we benefit from understanding the changes taking place in cytopathology practice as well as intersecting areas that may have implications for us. In this review, we discuss recent changes to 1. Classification systems, 2. Ancillary molecular testing modalities, and 3. Key metrics that affect thyroid cytopathology. The recent World Health Organization, Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology, and American Joint Committee on Cancer classification systems have aspects that are designed to harmonize the clinical, cytopathologic, histomorphologic, and molecular findings for improved communication and patient management. New terminologies such as thyroid follicular nodular disease and low-risk follicular cell-derived thyroid neoplasms are introduced to reflect the subtle biologic nuances involving benign non-neoplastic and low-grade neoplastic conditions. The Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology System has simplified its terminology, updated risk of malignancy estimates, and expanded the discussions on molecular testing, clinical and imaging assessments, and pediatric cytopathology. There is now a single term for each of the 6 diagnostic categories. The American Joint Committee on Cancer has refined the staging criteria to provide improved stratification of patient prognostication. Molecular testing using next-generation technology now offers large panels of markers that are sensitive for detecting the wide range of thyroid neoplasms. These panels were developed in North America and whether other regions of the world will choose similar tests remain to be seen. Finally, metrics such as molecular-derived risk of malignancy and molecular risk group may be viewed as surrogates of resection information and used to complement diagnostics, management, and quality assurance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 389-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213294524001893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213294524001893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲状腺诊断的概念在不断发展。作为细胞病理学家,了解细胞病理实践中发生的变化以及可能对我们产生影响的交叉领域,对我们大有裨益。在本综述中,我们将讨论 1.分类系统,2. 辅助分子检测方式,3.影响甲状腺细胞病理学的关键指标。最近的世界卫生组织、贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学和美国癌症联合委员会分类系统在某些方面旨在协调临床、细胞病理学、组织形态学和分子研究结果,以改善沟通和患者管理。该书引入了甲状腺滤泡结节病和低风险滤泡细胞源性甲状腺肿瘤等新术语,以反映良性非肿瘤性和低度肿瘤性疾病在生物学上的细微差别。贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学系统》简化了术语,更新了恶性肿瘤风险估计,并扩大了对分子检测、临床和影像评估以及儿童细胞病理学的讨论。现在,6 个诊断类别中的每个类别都有一个术语。美国癌症联合委员会对分期标准进行了改进,以更好地对患者预后进行分层。使用新一代技术进行的分子检测现在可以提供大量的标记物,这些标记物对检测各种甲状腺肿瘤非常敏感。这些试剂盒是在北美开发的,世界其他地区是否会选择类似的检测方法还有待观察。最后,恶性肿瘤分子衍生风险和分子风险组别等指标可被视为切除信息的替代物,用于补充诊断、管理和质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolving concepts in thyroid cytology
Concepts in thyroid diagnostics are evolving. As cytopathologists, we benefit from understanding the changes taking place in cytopathology practice as well as intersecting areas that may have implications for us. In this review, we discuss recent changes to 1. Classification systems, 2. Ancillary molecular testing modalities, and 3. Key metrics that affect thyroid cytopathology. The recent World Health Organization, Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology, and American Joint Committee on Cancer classification systems have aspects that are designed to harmonize the clinical, cytopathologic, histomorphologic, and molecular findings for improved communication and patient management. New terminologies such as thyroid follicular nodular disease and low-risk follicular cell-derived thyroid neoplasms are introduced to reflect the subtle biologic nuances involving benign non-neoplastic and low-grade neoplastic conditions. The Bethesda Thyroid Cytopathology System has simplified its terminology, updated risk of malignancy estimates, and expanded the discussions on molecular testing, clinical and imaging assessments, and pediatric cytopathology. There is now a single term for each of the 6 diagnostic categories. The American Joint Committee on Cancer has refined the staging criteria to provide improved stratification of patient prognostication. Molecular testing using next-generation technology now offers large panels of markers that are sensitive for detecting the wide range of thyroid neoplasms. These panels were developed in North America and whether other regions of the world will choose similar tests remain to be seen. Finally, metrics such as molecular-derived risk of malignancy and molecular risk group may be viewed as surrogates of resection information and used to complement diagnostics, management, and quality assurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信