{"title":"对 50 只患有非肿瘤性肛囊疾病的狗进行改良闭式肛囊切除术。","authors":"Allyson T Davis, Giselle L Hosgood","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe a modified closed sacculectomy technique for non-neoplastic anal sac disease in dogs, and to describe the management and short-term outcomes in dogs undergoing sacculectomy by the described technique.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 50 dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify dogs undergoing bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease using the described closed technique between January 1, 2013 and February 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 dogs underwent bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease. Intraoperative anal sac perforation was reported in five dogs (10%). A total of 43 dogs were available for two-week follow-up. Grade 1 complications were reported in 14/43 dogs (32%), grade 2 complications in 2/43 dogs (5%), and grade 3B in 2/43 dogs (5%). At two-weeks postoperatively, 13/14 dogs (93%) had resolution of grade 1 complications. Both dogs with grade 2 complications had resolution reported at two weeks postoperatively, and both dogs with grade 3B complications had resolution reported at two weeks following revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative complications consisted of anal sac perforation without further complication. Minor postoperative complications were mostly self-limiting, supporting previous literature. Major complications were infrequent and resolved following single revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The technique reported provides an alternative to excise intact and non-neoplastic anal sacs in dogs. The key features of this technique are immediate anal sac identification by following the anatomic path of the duct, minimal peri-saccular dissection, no requirement for packing of the anal sac, and complete removal of the duct and anal sac.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified closed sacculectomy in 50 dogs with non-neoplastic anal sac disease.\",\"authors\":\"Allyson T Davis, Giselle L Hosgood\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe a modified closed sacculectomy technique for non-neoplastic anal sac disease in dogs, and to describe the management and short-term outcomes in dogs undergoing sacculectomy by the described technique.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 50 dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify dogs undergoing bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease using the described closed technique between January 1, 2013 and February 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 dogs underwent bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease. Intraoperative anal sac perforation was reported in five dogs (10%). A total of 43 dogs were available for two-week follow-up. Grade 1 complications were reported in 14/43 dogs (32%), grade 2 complications in 2/43 dogs (5%), and grade 3B in 2/43 dogs (5%). At two-weeks postoperatively, 13/14 dogs (93%) had resolution of grade 1 complications. Both dogs with grade 2 complications had resolution reported at two weeks postoperatively, and both dogs with grade 3B complications had resolution reported at two weeks following revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative complications consisted of anal sac perforation without further complication. Minor postoperative complications were mostly self-limiting, supporting previous literature. Major complications were infrequent and resolved following single revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The technique reported provides an alternative to excise intact and non-neoplastic anal sacs in dogs. The key features of this technique are immediate anal sac identification by following the anatomic path of the duct, minimal peri-saccular dissection, no requirement for packing of the anal sac, and complete removal of the duct and anal sac.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modified closed sacculectomy in 50 dogs with non-neoplastic anal sac disease.
Objective: To describe a modified closed sacculectomy technique for non-neoplastic anal sac disease in dogs, and to describe the management and short-term outcomes in dogs undergoing sacculectomy by the described technique.
Study design: Retrospective case series.
Sample population: A total of 50 dogs.
Methods: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify dogs undergoing bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease using the described closed technique between January 1, 2013 and February 1, 2024.
Results: A total of 50 dogs underwent bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease. Intraoperative anal sac perforation was reported in five dogs (10%). A total of 43 dogs were available for two-week follow-up. Grade 1 complications were reported in 14/43 dogs (32%), grade 2 complications in 2/43 dogs (5%), and grade 3B in 2/43 dogs (5%). At two-weeks postoperatively, 13/14 dogs (93%) had resolution of grade 1 complications. Both dogs with grade 2 complications had resolution reported at two weeks postoperatively, and both dogs with grade 3B complications had resolution reported at two weeks following revision surgery.
Conclusion: Intraoperative complications consisted of anal sac perforation without further complication. Minor postoperative complications were mostly self-limiting, supporting previous literature. Major complications were infrequent and resolved following single revision surgery.
Clinical significance: The technique reported provides an alternative to excise intact and non-neoplastic anal sacs in dogs. The key features of this technique are immediate anal sac identification by following the anatomic path of the duct, minimal peri-saccular dissection, no requirement for packing of the anal sac, and complete removal of the duct and anal sac.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.