比较 Urolift 与单极 TURP 安全性和有效性的随机对照试验。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mostafa Sheba, Farouk El Gamal, Mohamed Abd El Wahed, Sameh Kotb, Alaa Meshref, Hussien Aly Hussein, Amr Mostafa Zahran
{"title":"比较 Urolift 与单极 TURP 安全性和有效性的随机对照试验。","authors":"Mostafa Sheba, Farouk El Gamal, Mohamed Abd El Wahed, Sameh Kotb, Alaa Meshref, Hussien Aly Hussein, Amr Mostafa Zahran","doi":"10.1177/03915603241277905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in ageing men. TURP is still the gold-standard procedure for the treatment of LUTS-BPH, however new minimally invasive modalities like Urolift procedure has been introduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with prostate size up to 100 g were offered both treatment modalities. Hundred patients were included in the study, 100 in TURP group (group A) and 100 in Urolift group (group B). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used at initial contact and for evaluation of response to treatment. Group A underwent TURP under regional anaesthetic, while group B underwent Urolift under sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age in both groups was 66.4 years. The IPSS score improvement among both groups is attached in the diagram. Group B patients had less hospital stay, better erectile and ejaculatory function compared to group B, and no stress incontinence was detected in group B while 6.7% of the patients in group A suffered some stress incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urolift has the benefit of preserving the ejaculatory function and less complications. Nevertheless, it has size limitations and the IPSS score improvement is less satisfactory when compared to TURP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241277905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised controlled trial comparing safety and efficacy of Urolift to monopolar TURP.\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Sheba, Farouk El Gamal, Mohamed Abd El Wahed, Sameh Kotb, Alaa Meshref, Hussien Aly Hussein, Amr Mostafa Zahran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241277905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in ageing men. TURP is still the gold-standard procedure for the treatment of LUTS-BPH, however new minimally invasive modalities like Urolift procedure has been introduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with prostate size up to 100 g were offered both treatment modalities. Hundred patients were included in the study, 100 in TURP group (group A) and 100 in Urolift group (group B). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used at initial contact and for evaluation of response to treatment. Group A underwent TURP under regional anaesthetic, while group B underwent Urolift under sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age in both groups was 66.4 years. The IPSS score improvement among both groups is attached in the diagram. Group B patients had less hospital stay, better erectile and ejaculatory function compared to group B, and no stress incontinence was detected in group B while 6.7% of the patients in group A suffered some stress incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urolift has the benefit of preserving the ejaculatory function and less complications. Nevertheless, it has size limitations and the IPSS score improvement is less satisfactory when compared to TURP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3915603241277905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241277905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241277905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的良性前列腺增生症(BPH)是导致老年男性出现下尿路症状(LUTS)的最常见原因。TURP仍是治疗良性前列腺增生症的金标准手术,但新的微创方法如Urolift手术已被引入:方法:为前列腺大小不超过 100 克的患者提供两种治疗方式。方法:前列腺大小不超过 100 克的患者可同时接受两种治疗方法。研究共纳入 100 名患者,其中 100 名患者属于 TURP 组(A 组),100 名患者属于 Urolift 组(B 组)。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)用于初次接触和评估治疗反应。A 组在区域麻醉下进行 TURP,B 组在镇静状态下进行 Urolift:结果:两组患者的平均年龄均为 66.4 岁。两组患者的 IPSS 评分改善情况见附图。与 B 组相比,B 组患者的住院时间更短,勃起和射精功能更好,B 组未发现压力性尿失禁,而 A 组有 6.7% 的患者出现压力性尿失禁:结论:尿道上提术具有保留射精功能和并发症少的优点。结论:尿道上提术具有保留射精功能和并发症较少的优点,但与 TURP 相比,尿道上提术有尺寸限制和 IPSS 评分改善不尽如人意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomised controlled trial comparing safety and efficacy of Urolift to monopolar TURP.

Objectives: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in ageing men. TURP is still the gold-standard procedure for the treatment of LUTS-BPH, however new minimally invasive modalities like Urolift procedure has been introduced.

Methods: Patients with prostate size up to 100 g were offered both treatment modalities. Hundred patients were included in the study, 100 in TURP group (group A) and 100 in Urolift group (group B). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used at initial contact and for evaluation of response to treatment. Group A underwent TURP under regional anaesthetic, while group B underwent Urolift under sedation.

Results: The mean age in both groups was 66.4 years. The IPSS score improvement among both groups is attached in the diagram. Group B patients had less hospital stay, better erectile and ejaculatory function compared to group B, and no stress incontinence was detected in group B while 6.7% of the patients in group A suffered some stress incontinence.

Conclusion: Urolift has the benefit of preserving the ejaculatory function and less complications. Nevertheless, it has size limitations and the IPSS score improvement is less satisfactory when compared to TURP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信