Colin Goudelocke, Rohit Dhir, Eve Shapiro, Kevin Cline, Denise Elser Poulos, Parke Hedges
{"title":"评估治疗膀胱过度活跃的生理闭环可穿戴胫神经调节系统(REDUCEOAB)的多中心前瞻性假对照试验。","authors":"Colin Goudelocke, Rohit Dhir, Eve Shapiro, Kevin Cline, Denise Elser Poulos, Parke Hedges","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a home-based, physiologic closed-loop wearable tibial neuromodulation system in comparison to a sham control for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial included 125 adult subjects with OAB who were randomized 1:1 to receive either active therapy with the Vivally System or sham therapy. Patients were allowed to continue concomitant OAB medications if therapy was stable and the remained on a consistent regimen throughout the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was a responder rate, defined as ≥50% reduction in daily urgency leaks or a ≥30% reduction in daily voids from baseline recorded on an electronic voiding diary. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting and patient satisfaction with the system was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population (n = 107), the responder rate was significantly higher in the active therapy arm (83.6%) compared to the sham arm (57.7%; P = .032). The system demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no serious AE. Patient satisfaction with the device and mobile application was high with 90/92 (97.8%) reporting they were moderately to extremely satisfied and therapy compliance was above 92% for both therapy and sham groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Vivally System showed significant improvement in OAB symptoms compared to sham therapy, demonstrating a high responder rate and excellent safety profile. The combination of physiologic closed-loop neuromodulation and a behavior-tracking application may offer an effective and user-friendly option for OAB management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multicenter Prospective Sham-controlled Trial Evaluating a Physiologic Closed-loop Wearable Tibial Neuromodulation System for Overactive Bladder.\",\"authors\":\"Colin Goudelocke, Rohit Dhir, Eve Shapiro, Kevin Cline, Denise Elser Poulos, Parke Hedges\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a home-based, physiologic closed-loop wearable tibial neuromodulation system in comparison to a sham control for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial included 125 adult subjects with OAB who were randomized 1:1 to receive either active therapy with the Vivally System or sham therapy. Patients were allowed to continue concomitant OAB medications if therapy was stable and the remained on a consistent regimen throughout the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was a responder rate, defined as ≥50% reduction in daily urgency leaks or a ≥30% reduction in daily voids from baseline recorded on an electronic voiding diary. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting and patient satisfaction with the system was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population (n = 107), the responder rate was significantly higher in the active therapy arm (83.6%) compared to the sham arm (57.7%; P = .032). The system demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no serious AE. Patient satisfaction with the device and mobile application was high with 90/92 (97.8%) reporting they were moderately to extremely satisfied and therapy compliance was above 92% for both therapy and sham groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Vivally System showed significant improvement in OAB symptoms compared to sham therapy, demonstrating a high responder rate and excellent safety profile. The combination of physiologic closed-loop neuromodulation and a behavior-tracking application may offer an effective and user-friendly option for OAB management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Multicenter Prospective Sham-controlled Trial Evaluating a Physiologic Closed-loop Wearable Tibial Neuromodulation System for Overactive Bladder.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a home-based, physiologic closed-loop wearable tibial neuromodulation system in comparison to a sham control for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).
Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial included 125 adult subjects with OAB who were randomized 1:1 to receive either active therapy with the Vivally System or sham therapy. Patients were allowed to continue concomitant OAB medications if therapy was stable and the remained on a consistent regimen throughout the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was a responder rate, defined as ≥50% reduction in daily urgency leaks or a ≥30% reduction in daily voids from baseline recorded on an electronic voiding diary. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting and patient satisfaction with the system was recorded.
Results: In the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population (n = 107), the responder rate was significantly higher in the active therapy arm (83.6%) compared to the sham arm (57.7%; P = .032). The system demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no serious AE. Patient satisfaction with the device and mobile application was high with 90/92 (97.8%) reporting they were moderately to extremely satisfied and therapy compliance was above 92% for both therapy and sham groups.
Conclusion: The Vivally System showed significant improvement in OAB symptoms compared to sham therapy, demonstrating a high responder rate and excellent safety profile. The combination of physiologic closed-loop neuromodulation and a behavior-tracking application may offer an effective and user-friendly option for OAB management.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.