在标准 EVAR 中使用 TREO 设备的实际经验:德国多中心研究 150 例病例的中期结果。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sebastian Zerwes, Ana-Maria Ciura, Hans-Henning Eckstein, Oksana Heiser, Johannes Kalder, Paula Keschenau, Mario Lescan, Bartosz Rylski, Stoyan Kondov, Jörg Teßarek, Hans-Kees Bruijnen, Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr
{"title":"在标准 EVAR 中使用 TREO 设备的实际经验:德国多中心研究 150 例病例的中期结果。","authors":"Sebastian Zerwes, Ana-Maria Ciura, Hans-Henning Eckstein, Oksana Heiser, Johannes Kalder, Paula Keschenau, Mario Lescan, Bartosz Rylski, Stoyan Kondov, Jörg Teßarek, Hans-Kees Bruijnen, Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. <i>Methods:</i> A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. <i>Results:</i> 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. <i>Conclusions:</i> This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real world experience with the TREO device in standard EVAR: Mid-term results of 150 cases from a German Multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Zerwes, Ana-Maria Ciura, Hans-Henning Eckstein, Oksana Heiser, Johannes Kalder, Paula Keschenau, Mario Lescan, Bartosz Rylski, Stoyan Kondov, Jörg Teßarek, Hans-Kees Bruijnen, Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. <i>Methods:</i> A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. <i>Results:</i> 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. <i>Conclusions:</i> This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景该研究的目的是分析德国六家医院使用 TREO(美国佛罗里达州泰尔茂主动脉)装置治疗的未入选患者的中期结果。研究方法对2017年1月至2020年11月期间在使用说明(IFU)内和使用说明(IFU)外接受治疗的患者进行了多中心回顾性分析。根据 IFU 状态,主要结果是技术成功率、死亡率和内移植物相关并发症。次要结果是动脉瘤/手术相关的再干预。结果150名患者(92%为男性,平均年龄为73±8岁)接受了TREO装置治疗腹主动脉瘤(IFU内84%,IFU外16%)(127例为完整动脉瘤,17例为无症状动脉瘤,6例为破裂动脉瘤;P=0.30)。147/150获得了技术成功(IFU内99%对IFU外92%,P=0.08)。30天死亡率为2%,一年死亡率为3%,总死亡率为5%。在平均 28.4 个月的随访期间(范围:1-67.4 个月),35 名患者(25%;IFU 内 23% 对 IFU 外 35%,P=0.23)出现内漏。大多数为 II 型内膜渗漏(33 人),其余为 Ia 型(5 人)和 Ib 型(3 人)。没有发生 III-V 型内漏、移位或动脉瘤破裂。总体而言,有19名患者(13%;IFU内13%,IFU外15%,P=0.70)接受了二次干预:分别是9例与内漏相关的血管内手术、3例开放式转换手术、2例与内移植肢体相关的干预、4例股动脉通路部位的手术翻修和2例与碗状缺血相关的手术。结论这项非行业赞助的多中心试验表明,在实际环境中(包括在 IFU 内部和外部)使用 TREO 设备治疗 AAA 患者似乎是可行的。虽然并发症和二次干预的发生率与之前公布的数据一致,但研究结果强调了标准 EVAR 与严重不良事件相关这一事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real world experience with the TREO device in standard EVAR: Mid-term results of 150 cases from a German Multicenter study.

Background: The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. Results: 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. Conclusions: This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信