希腊新初级医疗改革:关注农村医疗中心患者的期望、观点和看法。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.22605/RRH8816
Charikleia Vova-Chatzi, Emmanouil Symvoulakis, Christina Parpoula, Christos D Lionis
{"title":"希腊新初级医疗改革:关注农村医疗中心患者的期望、观点和看法。","authors":"Charikleia Vova-Chatzi, Emmanouil Symvoulakis, Christina Parpoula, Christos D Lionis","doi":"10.22605/RRH8816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient perception of quality of care is an essential component in evaluating healthcare delivery. This article reports data from primary health care (PHC) centers before Greece's most recent PHC reform. The study was undertaken to offer some baseline information about patient experience, support the decision-making processes taking place, and provide valuable input for future policy-making comparisons in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted across the 16 PHC centers of Epirus, a region of north-western Greece, from June to September 2017, with 532 patients rating the importance of different aspects of three main healthcare domains (clinical behavior, support and services, and organization of care) of PHC provision. The Greek version of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP) questionnaire was implemented for research purposes. Univariate comparisons were performed for patients with and without chronic disease, using Pearson's χ2 test for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study findings support that the organization of care domain is of highest importance and priority, with clinical behavior and support and services following closely. Among recruited patients, on average, only 2.1% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied (rated 4 or 5 on the Likert scale) with the organization of care aspects under consideration, compared to 18.4% of patients without a chronic disease. Furthermore, only 4% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied with the aspects examined in the clinical behavior domain, compared to 27% of patients without a chronic disease. Finally, 18% of sampled patients with a chronic disease reported being satisfied with the quality of support and services provided, compared to 38% of patients without a chronic disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is necessary to back up available past information to afterwards estimate reform imprinting on expectations and perceptions. The items and aspects of EUROPEP, in line with the new tasks of the personal doctor within the PHC system that patients perceive as most essential, can be used to prioritize quality improvement activities to strengthen PHC delivery in Greece. Communication skills, practices, and behavioral change skills seem to need more attention for an efficient PHC model.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 3","pages":"8816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the new primary care reform in Greece: a focus on patients' expectations, views and perceptions from rural healthcare centres.\",\"authors\":\"Charikleia Vova-Chatzi, Emmanouil Symvoulakis, Christina Parpoula, Christos D Lionis\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH8816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient perception of quality of care is an essential component in evaluating healthcare delivery. This article reports data from primary health care (PHC) centers before Greece's most recent PHC reform. The study was undertaken to offer some baseline information about patient experience, support the decision-making processes taking place, and provide valuable input for future policy-making comparisons in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted across the 16 PHC centers of Epirus, a region of north-western Greece, from June to September 2017, with 532 patients rating the importance of different aspects of three main healthcare domains (clinical behavior, support and services, and organization of care) of PHC provision. The Greek version of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP) questionnaire was implemented for research purposes. Univariate comparisons were performed for patients with and without chronic disease, using Pearson's χ2 test for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study findings support that the organization of care domain is of highest importance and priority, with clinical behavior and support and services following closely. Among recruited patients, on average, only 2.1% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied (rated 4 or 5 on the Likert scale) with the organization of care aspects under consideration, compared to 18.4% of patients without a chronic disease. Furthermore, only 4% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied with the aspects examined in the clinical behavior domain, compared to 27% of patients without a chronic disease. Finally, 18% of sampled patients with a chronic disease reported being satisfied with the quality of support and services provided, compared to 38% of patients without a chronic disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is necessary to back up available past information to afterwards estimate reform imprinting on expectations and perceptions. The items and aspects of EUROPEP, in line with the new tasks of the personal doctor within the PHC system that patients perceive as most essential, can be used to prioritize quality improvement activities to strengthen PHC delivery in Greece. Communication skills, practices, and behavioral change skills seem to need more attention for an efficient PHC model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"8816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8816\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:患者对医疗质量的感知是评估医疗服务的重要组成部分。本文报告了希腊最近一次初级卫生保健改革前来自初级卫生保健中心的数据。这项研究旨在提供一些有关患者体验的基本信息,为正在进行的决策过程提供支持,并为希腊未来的政策制定比较提供有价值的信息:研究于 2017 年 6 月至 9 月在希腊西北部地区伊庇鲁斯的 16 个初级保健中心进行,共有 532 名患者对初级保健提供的三个主要保健领域(临床行为、支持与服务以及保健组织)的不同方面的重要性进行了评分。出于研究目的,采用了欧洲全科患者评价工作组(EUROPEP)问卷的希腊语版本。对有慢性病和无慢性病的患者进行了单变量比较,对分类数据采用皮尔逊χ2 检验:研究结果表明,护理组织是最重要和最优先的领域,临床行为和支持与服务紧随其后。在被招募的患者中,平均只有 2.1%的慢性病患者对所考虑的护理组织方面表示满意(在李克特量表中被评为 4 分或 5 分),而无慢性病患者的这一比例为 18.4%。此外,仅有 4% 的慢性病患者对临床行为方面表示满意,而非慢性病患者的这一比例为 27%。最后,18%的抽样慢性病患者对所提供的支持和服务质量表示满意,而无慢性病患者的这一比例为 38%:结论:有必要对过去的信息进行备份,以便事后估计改革对期望和认知的影响。EUROPEP的项目和方面与患者认为最重要的私人医生在初级保健系统中的新任务相一致,可用于确定质量改进活动的优先次序,以加强希腊的初级保健服务。要实现高效的初级保健模式,似乎需要更多关注沟通技巧、实践和行为改变技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards the new primary care reform in Greece: a focus on patients' expectations, views and perceptions from rural healthcare centres.

Introduction: Patient perception of quality of care is an essential component in evaluating healthcare delivery. This article reports data from primary health care (PHC) centers before Greece's most recent PHC reform. The study was undertaken to offer some baseline information about patient experience, support the decision-making processes taking place, and provide valuable input for future policy-making comparisons in Greece.

Methods: The research was conducted across the 16 PHC centers of Epirus, a region of north-western Greece, from June to September 2017, with 532 patients rating the importance of different aspects of three main healthcare domains (clinical behavior, support and services, and organization of care) of PHC provision. The Greek version of the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP) questionnaire was implemented for research purposes. Univariate comparisons were performed for patients with and without chronic disease, using Pearson's χ2 test for categorical data.

Results: Study findings support that the organization of care domain is of highest importance and priority, with clinical behavior and support and services following closely. Among recruited patients, on average, only 2.1% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied (rated 4 or 5 on the Likert scale) with the organization of care aspects under consideration, compared to 18.4% of patients without a chronic disease. Furthermore, only 4% of patients with a chronic disease were satisfied with the aspects examined in the clinical behavior domain, compared to 27% of patients without a chronic disease. Finally, 18% of sampled patients with a chronic disease reported being satisfied with the quality of support and services provided, compared to 38% of patients without a chronic disease.

Conclusion: It is necessary to back up available past information to afterwards estimate reform imprinting on expectations and perceptions. The items and aspects of EUROPEP, in line with the new tasks of the personal doctor within the PHC system that patients perceive as most essential, can be used to prioritize quality improvement activities to strengthen PHC delivery in Greece. Communication skills, practices, and behavioral change skills seem to need more attention for an efficient PHC model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信