严重肺气肿患者的肺张力装置线圈治疗:前瞻性安全性和可行性试验(EFFORT)。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1159/000541366
Sharyn A Roodenburg, Karin Klooster, Jorine E Hartman, Konstantina Kontogianni, Judith M Brock, A Susanne Dittrich, Marlies van Dijk, T David Koster, Felix J F Herth, Dirk-Jan Slebos
{"title":"严重肺气肿患者的肺张力装置线圈治疗:前瞻性安全性和可行性试验(EFFORT)。","authors":"Sharyn A Roodenburg, Karin Klooster, Jorine E Hartman, Konstantina Kontogianni, Judith M Brock, A Susanne Dittrich, Marlies van Dijk, T David Koster, Felix J F Herth, Dirk-Jan Slebos","doi":"10.1159/000541366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, there is a lack of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction options that do not depend on fissure integrity. Endobronchial coils have been extensively studied to address this need but exhibited variable patient response and have been discontinued. Lung tension device (LTD) coils represent the next-generation coil treatment. This study aimed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LTD-coil treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced emphysema and hyperinflation were enrolled at two European sites. LTD-coils (Free Flow Medical, Fremont, CA, USA) were implanted in the two most destructed lobes, as determined by quantitative CT analysis, in two separate procedures. The primary endpoint was 3-month follow-up after the last treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (50% male, median age 64 years, FEV1 23%predicted, RV 249%predicted) received LTD-coil treatment: 12 received bilateral and 2 unilateral treatment. Six serious respiratory adverse events occurred within the initial 3 months posttreatment, including one device-associated death. Treatment significantly reduced in- and expiratory volume of the treated lobes (-410 [-710, -340], p = 0.004 and -650 [-730, -190] mL, p < 0.001, respectively) and improved quality of life (SGRQ total score -4.6 [-21.0, -2.6], p < 0.001). However, at a group level, no significant improvements in pulmonary function or 6-min walk distance were observed. Responder rates ranged from 18% to 54% for the different endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first-in-human study shows that the new LTD-coil procedure is feasible with a safety profile comparable to the previous coil treatment. While the treatment effectively reduced lobar volume and modestly improved quality of life up to 3 months' follow-up, at a group level it did not significantly enhance pulmonary function or exercise capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"58-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung Tensioning Device Coil Treatment in Patients with Severe Emphysema: A Prospective Safety and Feasibility Trial (EFFORT).\",\"authors\":\"Sharyn A Roodenburg, Karin Klooster, Jorine E Hartman, Konstantina Kontogianni, Judith M Brock, A Susanne Dittrich, Marlies van Dijk, T David Koster, Felix J F Herth, Dirk-Jan Slebos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, there is a lack of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction options that do not depend on fissure integrity. Endobronchial coils have been extensively studied to address this need but exhibited variable patient response and have been discontinued. Lung tension device (LTD) coils represent the next-generation coil treatment. This study aimed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LTD-coil treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced emphysema and hyperinflation were enrolled at two European sites. LTD-coils (Free Flow Medical, Fremont, CA, USA) were implanted in the two most destructed lobes, as determined by quantitative CT analysis, in two separate procedures. The primary endpoint was 3-month follow-up after the last treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (50% male, median age 64 years, FEV1 23%predicted, RV 249%predicted) received LTD-coil treatment: 12 received bilateral and 2 unilateral treatment. Six serious respiratory adverse events occurred within the initial 3 months posttreatment, including one device-associated death. Treatment significantly reduced in- and expiratory volume of the treated lobes (-410 [-710, -340], p = 0.004 and -650 [-730, -190] mL, p < 0.001, respectively) and improved quality of life (SGRQ total score -4.6 [-21.0, -2.6], p < 0.001). However, at a group level, no significant improvements in pulmonary function or 6-min walk distance were observed. Responder rates ranged from 18% to 54% for the different endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first-in-human study shows that the new LTD-coil procedure is feasible with a safety profile comparable to the previous coil treatment. While the treatment effectively reduced lobar volume and modestly improved quality of life up to 3 months' follow-up, at a group level it did not significantly enhance pulmonary function or exercise capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"58-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:目前,缺乏不依赖于裂隙完整性的支气管镜肺容积缩小方案。针对这一需求,支气管内线圈已被广泛研究,但患者反应不一,现已停止使用。肺张力装置(LTD)线圈代表了新一代的线圈治疗方法。本研究旨在评估LTD线圈治疗的安全性、可行性和有效性:方法:在欧洲的两个地点招募了晚期肺气肿和过度充气的患者。LTD线圈(FreeFlow Medical,加利福尼亚州,美国)通过CT定量分析,分两次植入破坏最严重的两个肺叶。主要终点是最后一次治疗后 3 个月的随访:14名患者(50%为男性,中位年龄64岁,FEV1为预测值的23%,RV为预测值的249%)接受了LTD线圈治疗:其中 12 人接受了双侧治疗,2 人接受了单侧治疗。治疗后最初 3 个月内发生了 6 起严重的呼吸系统不良事件,其中包括一起与设备相关的死亡事件。治疗后,接受治疗的肺叶呼气量和吸气量明显减少(分别为-410[-710,-340], p=.004 和-650[-730,-190] mL, p<.001),生活质量得到改善(SGRQ 总分-4.6[-21.0,-2.6], p<.001)。然而,在小组水平上,没有观察到肺功能或 6 分钟步行距离有明显改善。不同终点的应答率从 18% 到 54% 不等:这项首次进行的人体研究表明,新的LTD-线圈疗法是可行的,其安全性与之前的线圈疗法相当。虽然治疗有效减少了肺叶容积,并适度改善了随访 3 个月的生活质量,但在群体水平上,治疗并未显著提高肺功能或运动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung Tensioning Device Coil Treatment in Patients with Severe Emphysema: A Prospective Safety and Feasibility Trial (EFFORT).

Introduction: Currently, there is a lack of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction options that do not depend on fissure integrity. Endobronchial coils have been extensively studied to address this need but exhibited variable patient response and have been discontinued. Lung tension device (LTD) coils represent the next-generation coil treatment. This study aimed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LTD-coil treatment.

Methods: Patients with advanced emphysema and hyperinflation were enrolled at two European sites. LTD-coils (Free Flow Medical, Fremont, CA, USA) were implanted in the two most destructed lobes, as determined by quantitative CT analysis, in two separate procedures. The primary endpoint was 3-month follow-up after the last treatment.

Results: Fourteen patients (50% male, median age 64 years, FEV1 23%predicted, RV 249%predicted) received LTD-coil treatment: 12 received bilateral and 2 unilateral treatment. Six serious respiratory adverse events occurred within the initial 3 months posttreatment, including one device-associated death. Treatment significantly reduced in- and expiratory volume of the treated lobes (-410 [-710, -340], p = 0.004 and -650 [-730, -190] mL, p < 0.001, respectively) and improved quality of life (SGRQ total score -4.6 [-21.0, -2.6], p < 0.001). However, at a group level, no significant improvements in pulmonary function or 6-min walk distance were observed. Responder rates ranged from 18% to 54% for the different endpoints.

Conclusion: This first-in-human study shows that the new LTD-coil procedure is feasible with a safety profile comparable to the previous coil treatment. While the treatment effectively reduced lobar volume and modestly improved quality of life up to 3 months' follow-up, at a group level it did not significantly enhance pulmonary function or exercise capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信