人类背根神经节神经元中的持续(Nav1.9)钠电流。

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiulin Zhang, Jane E Hartung, Michael S Gold
{"title":"人类背根神经节神经元中的持续(Nav1.9)钠电流。","authors":"Xiulin Zhang, Jane E Hartung, Michael S Gold","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Nav1.9 is of interest to the pain community for a number of reasons, including the human mutations in the gene encoding Nav1.9, SCN11a, that are associated with both pain and loss of pain phenotypes. However, because much of what we know about the biophysical properties of Nav1.9 has been learned through the study of rodent sensory neurons, and there is only 76% identity between human and rodent homologs of SCN11a, there is reason to suggest that there may be differences in the biophysical properties of the channels in human and rodent sensory neurons, and consequently, the contribution of these channels to the control of sensory neuron excitability, if not pain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize Nav1.9 currents in human sensory neurons and compare the properties of these currents with those in rat sensory neurons recorded under identical conditions. Whole-cell patch clamp techniques were used to record Nav1.9 currents in isolated sensory neurons in vitro. Our results indicate that several of the core biophysical properties of the currents, including persistence and a low threshold for activation, are conserved across species. However, we noted a number of potentially important differences between the currents in human and rat sensory neurons including a lower threshold for activation, higher threshold for inactivation, slower deactivation, and faster recovery from slow inactivation. Human Nav1.9 was inhibited by inflammatory mediators, whereas rat Nav1.9 was potentiated. Our results may have implications for the role of Nav1.9 in sensory, if not nociceptive signaling.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent (Nav1.9) sodium currents in human dorsal root ganglion neurons.\",\"authors\":\"Xiulin Zhang, Jane E Hartung, Michael S Gold\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Nav1.9 is of interest to the pain community for a number of reasons, including the human mutations in the gene encoding Nav1.9, SCN11a, that are associated with both pain and loss of pain phenotypes. However, because much of what we know about the biophysical properties of Nav1.9 has been learned through the study of rodent sensory neurons, and there is only 76% identity between human and rodent homologs of SCN11a, there is reason to suggest that there may be differences in the biophysical properties of the channels in human and rodent sensory neurons, and consequently, the contribution of these channels to the control of sensory neuron excitability, if not pain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize Nav1.9 currents in human sensory neurons and compare the properties of these currents with those in rat sensory neurons recorded under identical conditions. Whole-cell patch clamp techniques were used to record Nav1.9 currents in isolated sensory neurons in vitro. Our results indicate that several of the core biophysical properties of the currents, including persistence and a low threshold for activation, are conserved across species. However, we noted a number of potentially important differences between the currents in human and rat sensory neurons including a lower threshold for activation, higher threshold for inactivation, slower deactivation, and faster recovery from slow inactivation. Human Nav1.9 was inhibited by inflammatory mediators, whereas rat Nav1.9 was potentiated. Our results may have implications for the role of Nav1.9 in sensory, if not nociceptive signaling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAIN®\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAIN®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003394\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Nav1.9 引起疼痛界关注的原因有很多,其中包括编码 Nav1.9 的基因 SCN11a 发生人类突变,这种突变与疼痛和痛觉丧失表型有关。然而,由于我们对 Nav1.9 生物物理特性的了解大多来自对啮齿类感觉神经元的研究,而 SCN11a 的人类同源物和啮齿类同源物之间只有 76% 的相同性,因此有理由认为,人类和啮齿类感觉神经元中通道的生物物理特性可能存在差异,进而影响这些通道对感觉神经元兴奋性(如果不是疼痛)控制的贡献。因此,本研究的目的是描述人类感觉神经元中 Nav1.9 电流的特性,并将这些电流的特性与在相同条件下记录的大鼠感觉神经元中的电流特性进行比较。我们使用全细胞膜片钳技术记录了离体感觉神经元中的 Nav1.9 电流。我们的结果表明,电流的一些核心生物物理特性,包括持续性和低激活阈值,在不同物种之间是一致的。然而,我们注意到人类和大鼠感觉神经元中的电流存在一些潜在的重要差异,包括较低的激活阈值、较高的失活阈值、较慢的失活速度以及从缓慢失活中较快的恢复速度。人的 Nav1.9 会受到炎症介质的抑制,而大鼠的 Nav1.9 则会增强。我们的研究结果可能会对 Nav1.9 在感觉信号(如果不是痛觉信号)中的作用产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistent (Nav1.9) sodium currents in human dorsal root ganglion neurons.

Abstract: Nav1.9 is of interest to the pain community for a number of reasons, including the human mutations in the gene encoding Nav1.9, SCN11a, that are associated with both pain and loss of pain phenotypes. However, because much of what we know about the biophysical properties of Nav1.9 has been learned through the study of rodent sensory neurons, and there is only 76% identity between human and rodent homologs of SCN11a, there is reason to suggest that there may be differences in the biophysical properties of the channels in human and rodent sensory neurons, and consequently, the contribution of these channels to the control of sensory neuron excitability, if not pain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize Nav1.9 currents in human sensory neurons and compare the properties of these currents with those in rat sensory neurons recorded under identical conditions. Whole-cell patch clamp techniques were used to record Nav1.9 currents in isolated sensory neurons in vitro. Our results indicate that several of the core biophysical properties of the currents, including persistence and a low threshold for activation, are conserved across species. However, we noted a number of potentially important differences between the currents in human and rat sensory neurons including a lower threshold for activation, higher threshold for inactivation, slower deactivation, and faster recovery from slow inactivation. Human Nav1.9 was inhibited by inflammatory mediators, whereas rat Nav1.9 was potentiated. Our results may have implications for the role of Nav1.9 in sensory, if not nociceptive signaling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信