胃肠道间质瘤基因组变异的人口统计趋势、共变和伊马替尼耐药性:AACR 项目 GENIE 分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1159/000541454
Hunter Stecko, Sidharth Iyer, Diamantis Tsilimigras, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"胃肠道间质瘤基因组变异的人口统计趋势、共变和伊马替尼耐药性:AACR 项目 GENIE 分析。","authors":"Hunter Stecko, Sidharth Iyer, Diamantis Tsilimigras, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1159/000541454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, the treatment of which represents a significant breakthrough in targeted cancer therapy. Given its overall rare nature, genomic differences and clinical implications between demographic groups have not been previously investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymized demographic, clinical, and genomic data from 1,559 GIST patients in the American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE database were analyzed using cBioPortal and custom Python scripts. Data on patient demographics, genomic alterations, and co-occurrence genetic alerations were collected and classified according to clinical implications using the OncoKB database. χ2 tests for differences in genomic alterations were used across various demographic factors and mutual exclusivity analysis was employed to identify co-mutation patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Male patients demonstrated higher incidence of PDGFRA mutation (14.56% vs. 8.05%; p &lt; 0.001), while female patients had higher likelihood of NF1 mutations (7.46% vs. 3.23%; p = 0.001). Asian patients had higher alteration rates at KIT (85.59%; p = 0.002). Co-occurrence analysis revealed KIT alterations frequently co-occurred with CDKN2A (q &lt; 0.001), MTAP (q = 0.045), and PTEN (q = 0.056), while there was mutual exclusivity with PDGFRA (q &lt; 0.001), NF1 (q &lt; 0.001), and BRAF (q = 0.015). CDKN2A alterations co-occurred with MTAP (q &lt; 0.001) and PIK3CA (q = 0.015), while being mutually exclusive with TP53 (q = 0.002) and NF1 (q = 0.007). Trends were similar among patients who had received no prior medical treatment. Imatinib-resistant mutations were more common among male patients (25.6% vs. 18.9%; p = 0.0056) and individuals under 55 (27.3% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.0228). Among patients with imatinib-resistant mutations, 77.78% had sunitinib resistance, while 70.25% maintained sensitivity to ripretinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sex and race/ethnic differences in genomic alterations, as well as co-mutations, were prevalent among patients with GIST. Variations in mutational profiles highlight the importance of distinct genetic drivers that may be targeted to treat different patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demographic Trends, Co-Alterations, and Imatinib Resistance across Genomic Variants in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: An AACR Project GENIE Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hunter Stecko, Sidharth Iyer, Diamantis Tsilimigras, Timothy M Pawlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, the treatment of which represents a significant breakthrough in targeted cancer therapy. Given its overall rare nature, genomic differences and clinical implications between demographic groups have not been previously investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymized demographic, clinical, and genomic data from 1,559 GIST patients in the American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE database were analyzed using cBioPortal and custom Python scripts. Data on patient demographics, genomic alterations, and co-occurrence genetic alerations were collected and classified according to clinical implications using the OncoKB database. χ2 tests for differences in genomic alterations were used across various demographic factors and mutual exclusivity analysis was employed to identify co-mutation patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Male patients demonstrated higher incidence of PDGFRA mutation (14.56% vs. 8.05%; p &lt; 0.001), while female patients had higher likelihood of NF1 mutations (7.46% vs. 3.23%; p = 0.001). Asian patients had higher alteration rates at KIT (85.59%; p = 0.002). Co-occurrence analysis revealed KIT alterations frequently co-occurred with CDKN2A (q &lt; 0.001), MTAP (q = 0.045), and PTEN (q = 0.056), while there was mutual exclusivity with PDGFRA (q &lt; 0.001), NF1 (q &lt; 0.001), and BRAF (q = 0.015). CDKN2A alterations co-occurred with MTAP (q &lt; 0.001) and PIK3CA (q = 0.015), while being mutually exclusive with TP53 (q = 0.002) and NF1 (q = 0.007). Trends were similar among patients who had received no prior medical treatment. Imatinib-resistant mutations were more common among male patients (25.6% vs. 18.9%; p = 0.0056) and individuals under 55 (27.3% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.0228). Among patients with imatinib-resistant mutations, 77.78% had sunitinib resistance, while 70.25% maintained sensitivity to ripretinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sex and race/ethnic differences in genomic alterations, as well as co-mutations, were prevalent among patients with GIST. Variations in mutational profiles highlight the importance of distinct genetic drivers that may be targeted to treat different patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541454\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)是最常见的胃肠道间质肿瘤,其治疗是癌症靶向治疗的重大突破。鉴于其总体上的罕见性,此前尚未完成对不同人口群体之间的基因组差异和临床影响的分析,但美国癌症研究协会(AACR)的 GENIE 项目使这种分析成为可能:方法: 使用 cBioPortal 和自定义 Python 脚本对 1,559 名 GIST 患者的匿名人口统计学、临床和基因组数据进行了分析,队列中没有排除任何患者。数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、基因组改变和共同发生信息,并根据临床影响使用 OncoKB 数据库进行分类。分析包括对不同人口统计学因素的基因组改变差异进行卡方检验,以及对共同突变模式进行互斥性分析:男性患者的 PDGFRA 基因突变率较高(14.56% vs 8.05%;p<0.001),而女性患者的 NF1 基因突变率较高(7.46% vs 3.23%;p=0.001)。亚洲患者的 KIT 变异率较高(85.59%;P=0.002)。共现分析显示,KIT改变经常与CDKN2A(q<0.001)、MTAP(q=0.045)和PTEN(q=0.056)共现,同时与PDGFRA(q<0.001)、NF1(q<0.001)和BRAF(q=.015)显示互斥性。CDKN2A改变与MTAP(q<0.001)和PIK3CA(q=.015)共存,而与TP53(q=.002)和NF1(q=.007)互斥。既往未接受过治疗的患者的趋势相似。伊马替尼耐药突变在男性患者(25.6% vs 18.9%; p=.0056)和55岁以下患者(27.3% vs 20.9%; p=.0228)中更为常见。在伊马替尼耐药突变的患者中,77.78%对舒尼替尼耐药,而70.25%对瑞瑞替尼保持敏感:结论:GIST 患者在基因组改变以及共突变方面普遍存在性别和种族/民族差异。突变特征的差异凸显了不同基因驱动因素的重要性,可针对不同患者群体进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demographic Trends, Co-Alterations, and Imatinib Resistance across Genomic Variants in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: An AACR Project GENIE Analysis.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, the treatment of which represents a significant breakthrough in targeted cancer therapy. Given its overall rare nature, genomic differences and clinical implications between demographic groups have not been previously investigated.

Methods: Anonymized demographic, clinical, and genomic data from 1,559 GIST patients in the American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE database were analyzed using cBioPortal and custom Python scripts. Data on patient demographics, genomic alterations, and co-occurrence genetic alerations were collected and classified according to clinical implications using the OncoKB database. χ2 tests for differences in genomic alterations were used across various demographic factors and mutual exclusivity analysis was employed to identify co-mutation patterns.

Results: Male patients demonstrated higher incidence of PDGFRA mutation (14.56% vs. 8.05%; p < 0.001), while female patients had higher likelihood of NF1 mutations (7.46% vs. 3.23%; p = 0.001). Asian patients had higher alteration rates at KIT (85.59%; p = 0.002). Co-occurrence analysis revealed KIT alterations frequently co-occurred with CDKN2A (q < 0.001), MTAP (q = 0.045), and PTEN (q = 0.056), while there was mutual exclusivity with PDGFRA (q < 0.001), NF1 (q < 0.001), and BRAF (q = 0.015). CDKN2A alterations co-occurred with MTAP (q < 0.001) and PIK3CA (q = 0.015), while being mutually exclusive with TP53 (q = 0.002) and NF1 (q = 0.007). Trends were similar among patients who had received no prior medical treatment. Imatinib-resistant mutations were more common among male patients (25.6% vs. 18.9%; p = 0.0056) and individuals under 55 (27.3% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.0228). Among patients with imatinib-resistant mutations, 77.78% had sunitinib resistance, while 70.25% maintained sensitivity to ripretinib.

Conclusion: Sex and race/ethnic differences in genomic alterations, as well as co-mutations, were prevalent among patients with GIST. Variations in mutational profiles highlight the importance of distinct genetic drivers that may be targeted to treat different patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信