社会对食物获取的支持和预算结构可预测大学二年级学生的食物不安全状况。

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rebekah Lunan, Melissa D Gutschall, Alisha R Farris, Kimberly S Fasczewski, Donald Holbert, Laura H McArthur
{"title":"社会对食物获取的支持和预算结构可预测大学二年级学生的食物不安全状况。","authors":"Rebekah Lunan, Melissa D Gutschall, Alisha R Farris, Kimberly S Fasczewski, Donald Holbert, Laura H McArthur","doi":"10.1177/02601060241283629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Food insecurity means having limited or uncertain access to an adequate, nutritious, and safe diet. Rates among US college students range from 10% to 75%, and the problem is associated with mental and physical health disorders and unfavorable academic outcomes. <b>Aims:</b> This study examined the associations between the food security status of sophomores attending a university in the Southeastern US and their need for social support, food access behaviors, and budgeting knowledge. <b>Methods:</b> Data were collected during the spring 2019 semester using an online questionnaire. Food security was measured using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Security Survey, and the independent variables were measured from scales grounded in pertinent literature. Descriptive and inferential procedures were applied, and significance was <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Participants were 222 sophomores (75% female and 85% white). Food insecurity was 46.4%, and significant predictors (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were need for social support accessing food and the requested educational activity \"learning how to make a budget.\" Mean budgeting knowledge scores of food secure and insecure students, respectively, were 11.5 ± 1.8 versus 11.1 ± 2.4 (<i>p</i> = 0.42) out of 14 points. Food access behaviors used \"sometimes\" or \"often\" by food secure and insecure sophomores included buying food on sale and buying the store brand of a food, while creating a budget that includes food purchases and getting free food from food pantries were \"seldom\" or \"never\" used. <b>Conclusions:</b> Food insecurity was high. Learning activities, such as budgeting education, should be tested as strategies for decreasing food insecurity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social support for food access and budget construction predict food insecurity among university sophomores.\",\"authors\":\"Rebekah Lunan, Melissa D Gutschall, Alisha R Farris, Kimberly S Fasczewski, Donald Holbert, Laura H McArthur\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02601060241283629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Food insecurity means having limited or uncertain access to an adequate, nutritious, and safe diet. Rates among US college students range from 10% to 75%, and the problem is associated with mental and physical health disorders and unfavorable academic outcomes. <b>Aims:</b> This study examined the associations between the food security status of sophomores attending a university in the Southeastern US and their need for social support, food access behaviors, and budgeting knowledge. <b>Methods:</b> Data were collected during the spring 2019 semester using an online questionnaire. Food security was measured using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Security Survey, and the independent variables were measured from scales grounded in pertinent literature. Descriptive and inferential procedures were applied, and significance was <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Participants were 222 sophomores (75% female and 85% white). Food insecurity was 46.4%, and significant predictors (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were need for social support accessing food and the requested educational activity \\\"learning how to make a budget.\\\" Mean budgeting knowledge scores of food secure and insecure students, respectively, were 11.5 ± 1.8 versus 11.1 ± 2.4 (<i>p</i> = 0.42) out of 14 points. Food access behaviors used \\\"sometimes\\\" or \\\"often\\\" by food secure and insecure sophomores included buying food on sale and buying the store brand of a food, while creating a budget that includes food purchases and getting free food from food pantries were \\\"seldom\\\" or \\\"never\\\" used. <b>Conclusions:</b> Food insecurity was high. Learning activities, such as budgeting education, should be tested as strategies for decreasing food insecurity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241283629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241283629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:粮食不安全是指获得充足、营养和安全饮食的机会有限或不确定。美国大学生中的这一比例从 10%到 75%不等,这一问题与身心健康障碍和不利的学业成绩有关。目的:本研究调查了美国东南部一所大学大二学生的食品安全状况与他们对社会支持的需求、食物获取行为和预算知识之间的关联。研究方法在 2019 年春季学期使用在线问卷收集数据。食品安全采用美国农业部(USDA)食品安全调查进行测量,自变量采用相关文献中的量表进行测量。采用了描述性和推论性程序,显著性为 p≤ 0.05。研究结果参与者为 222 名高二学生(75% 为女性,85% 为白人)。食物不安全的比例为 46.4%,在 14 点中有显著的预测因素(p p = 0.42)。食物安全和食物不安全的高二学生 "有时 "或 "经常 "使用的食物获取行为包括在打折时购买食物和购买商店品牌的食物,而 "很少 "或 "从未 "使用过包括购买食物在内的预算和从食物储藏室获取免费食物的行为。结论粮食不安全程度很高。应将预算教育等学习活动作为减少粮食不安全的策略进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social support for food access and budget construction predict food insecurity among university sophomores.

Background: Food insecurity means having limited or uncertain access to an adequate, nutritious, and safe diet. Rates among US college students range from 10% to 75%, and the problem is associated with mental and physical health disorders and unfavorable academic outcomes. Aims: This study examined the associations between the food security status of sophomores attending a university in the Southeastern US and their need for social support, food access behaviors, and budgeting knowledge. Methods: Data were collected during the spring 2019 semester using an online questionnaire. Food security was measured using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Security Survey, and the independent variables were measured from scales grounded in pertinent literature. Descriptive and inferential procedures were applied, and significance was p ≤ 0.05. Results: Participants were 222 sophomores (75% female and 85% white). Food insecurity was 46.4%, and significant predictors (p < 0.001) were need for social support accessing food and the requested educational activity "learning how to make a budget." Mean budgeting knowledge scores of food secure and insecure students, respectively, were 11.5 ± 1.8 versus 11.1 ± 2.4 (p = 0.42) out of 14 points. Food access behaviors used "sometimes" or "often" by food secure and insecure sophomores included buying food on sale and buying the store brand of a food, while creating a budget that includes food purchases and getting free food from food pantries were "seldom" or "never" used. Conclusions: Food insecurity was high. Learning activities, such as budgeting education, should be tested as strategies for decreasing food insecurity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信