骨盆和髋臼骨折患者围手术期使用氨甲环酸的疗效评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yijie Yin, Jiabao Jiang, Chang Zou, Shenbo Huang, Shuai He, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, You Yu, Yue Fang
{"title":"骨盆和髋臼骨折患者围手术期使用氨甲环酸的疗效评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yijie Yin, Jiabao Jiang, Chang Zou, Shenbo Huang, Shuai He, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, You Yu, Yue Fang","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used to reduce perioperative bleeding in various surgeries, including acetabular and pelvic fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, research on TXA's effectiveness and safety in this context is conflicting. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on TXA's efficacy and safety in patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures undergoing ORIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases until August 30, 2023. Our evaluation of TXA focused on 6 domains: estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion units, transfusion rates, thromboembolic events, other complications, and surgery duration. Data from these studies were analyzed using RevMan Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 4 randomized controlled trials with 179 patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures treated with TXA. The analysis showed that TXA did not significantly reduce EBL, packed red blood cell transfusion units, blood transfusion rates, or surgery duration. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic events or other postoperative complications, like surgical wound issues, pneumonia, heterotopic ossification, and sciatic nerve injuries, between the TXA and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA did not demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing perioperative bleeding or complications in patients treated with ORIF for acetabular and pelvic fractures. The utilization of TXA in such clinical scenarios remains a topic necessitating further rigorous investigation to delineate its role in this clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy of perioperative tranexamic acid in patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yijie Yin, Jiabao Jiang, Chang Zou, Shenbo Huang, Shuai He, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, You Yu, Yue Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000039703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used to reduce perioperative bleeding in various surgeries, including acetabular and pelvic fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, research on TXA's effectiveness and safety in this context is conflicting. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on TXA's efficacy and safety in patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures undergoing ORIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases until August 30, 2023. Our evaluation of TXA focused on 6 domains: estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion units, transfusion rates, thromboembolic events, other complications, and surgery duration. Data from these studies were analyzed using RevMan Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 4 randomized controlled trials with 179 patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures treated with TXA. The analysis showed that TXA did not significantly reduce EBL, packed red blood cell transfusion units, blood transfusion rates, or surgery duration. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic events or other postoperative complications, like surgical wound issues, pneumonia, heterotopic ossification, and sciatic nerve injuries, between the TXA and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA did not demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing perioperative bleeding or complications in patients treated with ORIF for acetabular and pelvic fractures. The utilization of TXA in such clinical scenarios remains a topic necessitating further rigorous investigation to delineate its role in this clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)常用于减少各种手术的围手术期出血,包括采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗的髋臼和骨盆骨折。然而,有关 TXA 在这种情况下的有效性和安全性的研究却相互矛盾。为此,我们对接受开放复位内固定术(ORIF)的髋臼和骨盆骨折患者使用 TXA 的有效性和安全性进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:我们对 Cochrane、PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了系统检索,直至 2023 年 8 月 30 日。我们对TXA的评估主要集中在6个方面:估计失血量(EBL)、输血单位、输血率、血栓栓塞事件、其他并发症和手术持续时间。我们使用 RevMan Manager 5.4 对这些研究的数据进行了分析:该研究包括 4 项随机对照试验,179 名髋臼和骨盆骨折患者接受了 TXA 治疗。分析表明,TXA 并未显著减少 EBL、包装红细胞输血单位、输血率或手术时间。血栓栓塞事件或其他术后并发症,如手术伤口问题、肺炎、异位骨化和坐骨神经损伤等,在TXA组和对照组之间没有明显差异:TXA在减少髋臼和骨盆骨折ORIF患者围手术期出血或并发症方面并无明显益处。在此类临床情况下使用 TXA 仍是一个需要进一步严格研究的课题,以确定其在临床环境中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the efficacy of perioperative tranexamic acid in patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used to reduce perioperative bleeding in various surgeries, including acetabular and pelvic fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, research on TXA's effectiveness and safety in this context is conflicting. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on TXA's efficacy and safety in patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures undergoing ORIF.

Methods: We systematically searched Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases until August 30, 2023. Our evaluation of TXA focused on 6 domains: estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion units, transfusion rates, thromboembolic events, other complications, and surgery duration. Data from these studies were analyzed using RevMan Manager 5.4.

Results: This study included 4 randomized controlled trials with 179 patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures treated with TXA. The analysis showed that TXA did not significantly reduce EBL, packed red blood cell transfusion units, blood transfusion rates, or surgery duration. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic events or other postoperative complications, like surgical wound issues, pneumonia, heterotopic ossification, and sciatic nerve injuries, between the TXA and control groups.

Conclusion: TXA did not demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing perioperative bleeding or complications in patients treated with ORIF for acetabular and pelvic fractures. The utilization of TXA in such clinical scenarios remains a topic necessitating further rigorous investigation to delineate its role in this clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信