Kenneth Thomsen, Raluca Jalaboi, Ole Winther, Hans Bredsted Lomholt, Henrik F Lorentzen, Trine Høgsberg, Henrik Egekvist, Lene Hedelund, Sofie Jørgensen, Sanne Frost, Trine Bertelsen, Lars Iversen
{"title":"利用深度学习对多毛女性及其接受激光治疗的资格进行医生级别的评估。","authors":"Kenneth Thomsen, Raluca Jalaboi, Ole Winther, Hans Bredsted Lomholt, Henrik F Lorentzen, Trine Høgsberg, Henrik Egekvist, Lene Hedelund, Sofie Jørgensen, Sanne Frost, Trine Bertelsen, Lars Iversen","doi":"10.1002/lsm.23843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hirsutism is a widespread condition affecting 5%-15% of females. Laser treatment of hirsutism has the best long-term effect. Patients with nonpigmented or nonterminal hairs are not eligible for laser treatment, and the current patient journey needed to establish eligibility for laser hair removal is problematic in many health-care systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we compared the ability to assess eligibility for laser hair removal of health-care professionals and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CNN ensemble model, synthesized from the outputs of five individual CNN models, reached an eligibility assessment accuracy of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42-0.60) and a κ of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13-0.27), taking a consensus expert label as reference. For comparison, board-certified dermatologists achieved a mean accuracy of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.44-0.52) and a mean κ of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Intra-rater analysis of board-certified dermatologists yielded κ in the 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.40) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.74) range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current assessment of eligibility for laser hair removal is challenging. Developing a laser hair removal eligibility assessment tool based on deep learning that performs on a par with trained dermatologists is feasible. Such a model may potentially reduce workload, increase quality and effectiveness, and facilitate equal health-care access. However, to achieve true clinical generalizability, prospective randomized clinical intervention studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician Level Assessment of Hirsute Women and of Their Eligibility for Laser Treatment With Deep Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Thomsen, Raluca Jalaboi, Ole Winther, Hans Bredsted Lomholt, Henrik F Lorentzen, Trine Høgsberg, Henrik Egekvist, Lene Hedelund, Sofie Jørgensen, Sanne Frost, Trine Bertelsen, Lars Iversen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lsm.23843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hirsutism is a widespread condition affecting 5%-15% of females. Laser treatment of hirsutism has the best long-term effect. Patients with nonpigmented or nonterminal hairs are not eligible for laser treatment, and the current patient journey needed to establish eligibility for laser hair removal is problematic in many health-care systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we compared the ability to assess eligibility for laser hair removal of health-care professionals and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CNN ensemble model, synthesized from the outputs of five individual CNN models, reached an eligibility assessment accuracy of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42-0.60) and a κ of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13-0.27), taking a consensus expert label as reference. For comparison, board-certified dermatologists achieved a mean accuracy of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.44-0.52) and a mean κ of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Intra-rater analysis of board-certified dermatologists yielded κ in the 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.40) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.74) range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current assessment of eligibility for laser hair removal is challenging. Developing a laser hair removal eligibility assessment tool based on deep learning that performs on a par with trained dermatologists is feasible. Such a model may potentially reduce workload, increase quality and effectiveness, and facilitate equal health-care access. However, to achieve true clinical generalizability, prospective randomized clinical intervention studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23843\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physician Level Assessment of Hirsute Women and of Their Eligibility for Laser Treatment With Deep Learning.
Objectives: Hirsutism is a widespread condition affecting 5%-15% of females. Laser treatment of hirsutism has the best long-term effect. Patients with nonpigmented or nonterminal hairs are not eligible for laser treatment, and the current patient journey needed to establish eligibility for laser hair removal is problematic in many health-care systems.
Methods: In this study, we compared the ability to assess eligibility for laser hair removal of health-care professionals and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models.
Results: The CNN ensemble model, synthesized from the outputs of five individual CNN models, reached an eligibility assessment accuracy of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42-0.60) and a κ of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13-0.27), taking a consensus expert label as reference. For comparison, board-certified dermatologists achieved a mean accuracy of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.44-0.52) and a mean κ of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Intra-rater analysis of board-certified dermatologists yielded κ in the 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.40) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.74) range.
Conclusion: Current assessment of eligibility for laser hair removal is challenging. Developing a laser hair removal eligibility assessment tool based on deep learning that performs on a par with trained dermatologists is feasible. Such a model may potentially reduce workload, increase quality and effectiveness, and facilitate equal health-care access. However, to achieve true clinical generalizability, prospective randomized clinical intervention studies are needed.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.