10 年产前肾积水经验:比较两种不同的指南。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Esra Ensari, Onder Yavascan, Caner Alparslan, Elif Perihan Oncel, Aslıhan Arslan Maden, Belde Kasap Demir, Demet Alaygut, Tunc Ozdemir
{"title":"10 年产前肾积水经验:比较两种不同的指南。","authors":"Esra Ensari, Onder Yavascan, Caner Alparslan, Elif Perihan Oncel, Aslıhan Arslan Maden, Belde Kasap Demir, Demet Alaygut, Tunc Ozdemir","doi":"10.1055/a-2381-7373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal hydronephrosis refers to the dilation of the renal pelvis and/or calyces in the developing fetus. The challenge lies in distinguishing between cases that warrant long-term follow-up or surgical intervention and those with transient hydronephrosis that require minimal invasive investigations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our study aimed to assess and contrast the efficacy of the 2015 Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract Guideline from the Turkish Society of Pediatric Nephrology with the Tepecik Antenatal Hydronephrosis Guideline, which was previously employed in our hospital. We conducted a comparative analysis of demographic data, outcome conditions, additional imaging requirements and quantities, radiation exposures, and rates of surgical interventions between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 2 had a significantly higher detection rate of Vesicoureteral Reflux via voiding cystourethrogram at 38.5% compared to Group 1's 13.4% (p<0.01). The incidence of abnormal findings with dimercaptosuccinic acid was similar between Group 1 (28.5%) and Group 2 (26.4%) (p>0.01), but Group 2 had a higher rate of obstruction diagnosis at 68.8% versus Group 1's 29.4% (p<0.01). Group 1 had greater median radiation exposure (500 mrem vs. 200 mrem, p<0.01), and a higher proportion of patients underwent surgery (34.2% vs. 21.9%, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the new guideline required fewer tests, was less invasive, and exposed patients to less radiation than the old guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":17846,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Padiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"10 Years of Antenatal Hydronephrosis Experience: Comparing Two Different Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Esra Ensari, Onder Yavascan, Caner Alparslan, Elif Perihan Oncel, Aslıhan Arslan Maden, Belde Kasap Demir, Demet Alaygut, Tunc Ozdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2381-7373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal hydronephrosis refers to the dilation of the renal pelvis and/or calyces in the developing fetus. The challenge lies in distinguishing between cases that warrant long-term follow-up or surgical intervention and those with transient hydronephrosis that require minimal invasive investigations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our study aimed to assess and contrast the efficacy of the 2015 Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract Guideline from the Turkish Society of Pediatric Nephrology with the Tepecik Antenatal Hydronephrosis Guideline, which was previously employed in our hospital. We conducted a comparative analysis of demographic data, outcome conditions, additional imaging requirements and quantities, radiation exposures, and rates of surgical interventions between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 2 had a significantly higher detection rate of Vesicoureteral Reflux via voiding cystourethrogram at 38.5% compared to Group 1's 13.4% (p<0.01). The incidence of abnormal findings with dimercaptosuccinic acid was similar between Group 1 (28.5%) and Group 2 (26.4%) (p>0.01), but Group 2 had a higher rate of obstruction diagnosis at 68.8% versus Group 1's 29.4% (p<0.01). Group 1 had greater median radiation exposure (500 mrem vs. 200 mrem, p<0.01), and a higher proportion of patients underwent surgery (34.2% vs. 21.9%, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the new guideline required fewer tests, was less invasive, and exposed patients to less radiation than the old guideline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Padiatrie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Padiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2381-7373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Padiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2381-7373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产前肾积水是指发育中胎儿的肾盂和/或肾盏扩张。难点在于如何区分需要长期随访或手术干预的病例和只需进行微创检查的一过性肾积水病例:我们的研究旨在评估土耳其小儿肾脏病学会 2015 年《先天性肾脏和尿路异常指南》与我院之前采用的《Tepecik 产前肾积水指南》的有效性并进行对比。我们对两组的人口统计学数据、结果条件、额外的成像要求和数量、辐射暴露和手术干预率进行了比较分析:结果:第 2 组通过排尿膀胱尿道造影检查发现膀胱输尿管反流的比例为 38.5%,明显高于第 1 组的 13.4%(P0.01),但第 2 组诊断出梗阻的比例为 68.8%,高于第 1 组的 29.4%(P结论:这项研究表明,与旧指南相比,新指南所需的检查更少,创伤更小,患者受到的辐射也更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
10 Years of Antenatal Hydronephrosis Experience: Comparing Two Different Guidelines.

Background: Antenatal hydronephrosis refers to the dilation of the renal pelvis and/or calyces in the developing fetus. The challenge lies in distinguishing between cases that warrant long-term follow-up or surgical intervention and those with transient hydronephrosis that require minimal invasive investigations.

Materials and methods: Our study aimed to assess and contrast the efficacy of the 2015 Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract Guideline from the Turkish Society of Pediatric Nephrology with the Tepecik Antenatal Hydronephrosis Guideline, which was previously employed in our hospital. We conducted a comparative analysis of demographic data, outcome conditions, additional imaging requirements and quantities, radiation exposures, and rates of surgical interventions between two groups.

Results: Group 2 had a significantly higher detection rate of Vesicoureteral Reflux via voiding cystourethrogram at 38.5% compared to Group 1's 13.4% (p<0.01). The incidence of abnormal findings with dimercaptosuccinic acid was similar between Group 1 (28.5%) and Group 2 (26.4%) (p>0.01), but Group 2 had a higher rate of obstruction diagnosis at 68.8% versus Group 1's 29.4% (p<0.01). Group 1 had greater median radiation exposure (500 mrem vs. 200 mrem, p<0.01), and a higher proportion of patients underwent surgery (34.2% vs. 21.9%, p<0.01).

Conclusion: This study showed that the new guideline required fewer tests, was less invasive, and exposed patients to less radiation than the old guideline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Klinische Padiatrie
Klinische Padiatrie 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Forum für wissenschaftliche Information in der Kinderheilkunde ausgewählte Originalarbeiten aus allen Bereichen der Pädiatrie Visite: Ihr Forum für interessante Krankengeschichten und außergewöhnliche Kasuistiken aktuelle Fortschritte in Diagnostik und Therapie jährliche Schwerpunkthefte: Ergebnisse der pädiatrischen Onkologie plus Medizin und Markt topaktuelle Informationen aus der Industrie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信