在网状移植物中加入自体皮肤细胞悬浮液后的伤口愈合和疤痕形态。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.006
Monica L Collins, Dillon Williams, Brooke E Pierson, Cameron S D'Orio, Mary A Oliver, Lauren T Moffatt, Jeffrey W Shupp, Taryn E Travis, Bonnie C Carney
{"title":"在网状移植物中加入自体皮肤细胞悬浮液后的伤口愈合和疤痕形态。","authors":"Monica L Collins, Dillon Williams, Brooke E Pierson, Cameron S D'Orio, Mary A Oliver, Lauren T Moffatt, Jeffrey W Shupp, Taryn E Travis, Bonnie C Carney","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A common treatment for large deep-to-full-thickness burns is excision and grafting with a widely meshed split-thickness skin graft (mSTSG). Due to the differential healing of the interstices and adhered split-thickness skin graft, wound patterning and delayed wound healing are common outcomes of this treatment. Delayed healing may increase infection rates and wound care requirements, while wound patterning may be psychologically and aesthetically consequential for patients. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be used to \"over spray\" a meshed autograft. It was hypothesized that the use of ASCS combined with mSTSG would increase the rate of wound healing and decrease patterning in healed burn wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full-thickness burns or excisional wounds (n = 8 each) were created in red Duroc pigs and received 4:1 mSTSGs after wound bed preparation. Half of the wounds received ASCS and half did not at the time of grafting. Percent re-epithelialization, patterning, rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal and epidermal thickness, immunofluorescent S100β staining, and melanin index were assessed for each scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wounds that received ASCS exhibited increased rates of re-epithelialization (burn +ACSC versus burn-ASCS; day 3 (53.9 ± 3.1 versus 34.3 ± 3.3, P = 0.009): day 5 (68.1 ± 1.6 versus 40.8 ± 3.2, P < 0.001)). Excision +ASCS versus excision-ASCS; day 7 (98.1 ± 1.2 versus 86.4 ± 2.0, day 7 P = 0.022) compared to wounds not treated with ASCS. There was no difference in rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal thickness, epidermal thickness, S100β staining, melanin index, or patterning was measured between wounds that received ASCS and those that did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of ASCS to 4:1 mSTSGs leads to increased rate of wound healing but does not impact the degree of patterning in this model, suggesting that ASCS application likely robustly transfers keratinocytes but not functioning melanocytes at acute timepoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wound Healing and Scar Patterning After Addition of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension to Meshed Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Monica L Collins, Dillon Williams, Brooke E Pierson, Cameron S D'Orio, Mary A Oliver, Lauren T Moffatt, Jeffrey W Shupp, Taryn E Travis, Bonnie C Carney\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A common treatment for large deep-to-full-thickness burns is excision and grafting with a widely meshed split-thickness skin graft (mSTSG). Due to the differential healing of the interstices and adhered split-thickness skin graft, wound patterning and delayed wound healing are common outcomes of this treatment. Delayed healing may increase infection rates and wound care requirements, while wound patterning may be psychologically and aesthetically consequential for patients. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be used to \\\"over spray\\\" a meshed autograft. It was hypothesized that the use of ASCS combined with mSTSG would increase the rate of wound healing and decrease patterning in healed burn wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full-thickness burns or excisional wounds (n = 8 each) were created in red Duroc pigs and received 4:1 mSTSGs after wound bed preparation. Half of the wounds received ASCS and half did not at the time of grafting. Percent re-epithelialization, patterning, rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal and epidermal thickness, immunofluorescent S100β staining, and melanin index were assessed for each scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wounds that received ASCS exhibited increased rates of re-epithelialization (burn +ACSC versus burn-ASCS; day 3 (53.9 ± 3.1 versus 34.3 ± 3.3, P = 0.009): day 5 (68.1 ± 1.6 versus 40.8 ± 3.2, P < 0.001)). Excision +ASCS versus excision-ASCS; day 7 (98.1 ± 1.2 versus 86.4 ± 2.0, day 7 P = 0.022) compared to wounds not treated with ASCS. There was no difference in rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal thickness, epidermal thickness, S100β staining, melanin index, or patterning was measured between wounds that received ASCS and those that did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of ASCS to 4:1 mSTSGs leads to increased rate of wound healing but does not impact the degree of patterning in this model, suggesting that ASCS application likely robustly transfers keratinocytes but not functioning melanocytes at acute timepoints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:大面积深层至全层烧伤的常见治疗方法是切除并用大网膜分层植皮(mSTSG)。由于间隙和粘连的分层厚皮移植的愈合情况不同,这种治疗方法常见的结果是伤口花纹和伤口延迟愈合。延迟愈合可能会增加感染率和伤口护理要求,而伤口花纹可能会对患者的心理和美观造成影响。自体皮肤细胞悬浮液(ASCS)可用于 "过度喷洒 "网状自体移植物。我们假设 ASCS 与 mSTSG 结合使用可提高伤口愈合率,减少愈合烧伤创面的花纹:方法:在红色杜洛克猪身上创建全厚烧伤或切除伤口(各为 8 个),并在伤口床准备后接受 4:1 mSTSG。一半的伤口在移植时接受了 ASCS,一半没有。对每个疤痕的再上皮化百分比、形态、齿嵴比率、细胞度、真皮和表皮厚度、免疫荧光 S100β 染色和黑色素指数进行了评估:结果:接受 ASCS 治疗的创面再上皮率增加(烧伤 +ACSC 与烧伤-ASCS 相比;第 3 天(53.9 ± 3.1 与 34.3 ± 3.3,P = 0.009):第 5 天(68.1 ± 1.6 与 40.8 ± 3.2,P 结论:ASCS 与烧伤-ASCS 相比,创面再上皮率增加:在 4:1 mSTSGs 中添加 ASCS 可提高伤口愈合率,但不会影响该模型的图案化程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wound Healing and Scar Patterning After Addition of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension to Meshed Grafts.

Introduction: A common treatment for large deep-to-full-thickness burns is excision and grafting with a widely meshed split-thickness skin graft (mSTSG). Due to the differential healing of the interstices and adhered split-thickness skin graft, wound patterning and delayed wound healing are common outcomes of this treatment. Delayed healing may increase infection rates and wound care requirements, while wound patterning may be psychologically and aesthetically consequential for patients. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be used to "over spray" a meshed autograft. It was hypothesized that the use of ASCS combined with mSTSG would increase the rate of wound healing and decrease patterning in healed burn wounds.

Methods: Full-thickness burns or excisional wounds (n = 8 each) were created in red Duroc pigs and received 4:1 mSTSGs after wound bed preparation. Half of the wounds received ASCS and half did not at the time of grafting. Percent re-epithelialization, patterning, rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal and epidermal thickness, immunofluorescent S100β staining, and melanin index were assessed for each scar.

Results: Wounds that received ASCS exhibited increased rates of re-epithelialization (burn +ACSC versus burn-ASCS; day 3 (53.9 ± 3.1 versus 34.3 ± 3.3, P = 0.009): day 5 (68.1 ± 1.6 versus 40.8 ± 3.2, P < 0.001)). Excision +ASCS versus excision-ASCS; day 7 (98.1 ± 1.2 versus 86.4 ± 2.0, day 7 P = 0.022) compared to wounds not treated with ASCS. There was no difference in rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal thickness, epidermal thickness, S100β staining, melanin index, or patterning was measured between wounds that received ASCS and those that did not.

Conclusions: The addition of ASCS to 4:1 mSTSGs leads to increased rate of wound healing but does not impact the degree of patterning in this model, suggesting that ASCS application likely robustly transfers keratinocytes but not functioning melanocytes at acute timepoints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信