{"title":"体外阳极氧化对钛基台表面粗糙度和细菌附着力的影响。","authors":"Shaghayegh Golalipour, Ezatollah Jalalian, Sara Koosha, Sotude Khorshidi, Maryam Torshabi, Maryam Sayyari","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (10<sup>5</sup> CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.\",\"authors\":\"Shaghayegh Golalipour, Ezatollah Jalalian, Sara Koosha, Sotude Khorshidi, Maryam Torshabi, Maryam Sayyari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (10<sup>5</sup> CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
问题陈述:钛基台被认为是牙科植入物的标准,但其灰色会影响美观。目的:本体外研究的目的是评估阳极氧化处理对钛基台表面粗糙度和细菌附着力的影响:16个钛基台被分为试验组(阳极氧化)和对照组(非阳极氧化)(n=8)。阳极氧化使用 7 节 9 V 电池的 63 V 电压和 250 mL 蒸馏水加 1 g 磷酸三钠的电解液。使用轮廓仪以 4 毫牛顿的力和 0.5 毫米/秒的速度测量表面粗糙度,每个试样评估 3 个龈上点。此外,还从每组中选择一个试样进行场发射扫描电子显微镜(FE-SEM)检查。消毒后的基台接触金黄色葡萄球菌悬浮液(105 CFUs/mL),然后放入磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中,超声、涡旋、稀释并在琼脂上培养。将 144 个微孔板在 37 °C 下培养 24 小时后,对细菌粘附性进行评估。使用稀释因子和连续稀释法计算菌落计数,并绘制 CFUs/mL 的对数 10。数据分析中,细菌粘附采用学生 t 检验,表面粗糙度采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α=.05):结果:试验组和对照组的表面粗糙度无明显差异(P>.05)。然而,细菌在阳极氧化基台上的附着力明显低于对照组(PC结论:对钛基台进行阳极氧化处理可明显减少细菌附着,对表面粗糙度无明显影响。
In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.
Statement of problem: Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.
Material and methods: Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (105 CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).
Results: The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).
Conclusions: Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.