{"title":"第一和第二孕期非整倍体筛查生物标志物与前置胎盘和无胎盘的风险评估:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Anastasia Mortaki MD , Athanasios Douligeris MD, MSc , Michail Panagiotopoulos MD, MSc , Maria-Anastasia Daskalaki MS , Vasilios Pergialiotis MD, MSc, PhD , Panagiotis Antsaklis MD, PhD , George Daskalakis MD, PhD , Marianna Theodora MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates differences in first and second-trimester maternal serum biomarkers for aneuploidy screening among women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, placenta previa, and those with normal placentation.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>A systematic review of 5 major databases up to April 2023 was conducted. Included were comparative studies analyzing mean biomarker levels in multiples of the median (MoM) among pregnant women with PAS, placenta previa, and uncomplicated pregnancies.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Both observational studies and randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction and Data Synthesis</h3><div>Analysis of 8 retrospective studies involving 1886 participants showed significant variances in biomarker levels. In the first trimester, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels were notably higher in the PAS group compared to the placenta previa group (731 patients, mean difference (MD) 0.48 MoM; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.73, <em>P</em> = 0.0001). Also, β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels were elevated in the placenta previa group compared to those with normal attachment (362 patients, MD 0.27 MoM; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.38, <em>P</em> < 0.00001). In the second trimester, alpha fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin levels were significantly increased in PAS patients compared to the placenta previa and normal groups, indicating potential markers for PAS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant differences in early pregnancy biomarker levels among women with PAS, placenta previa, and normal placentation were identified. These findings suggest potential for early screening, but further large-scale studies are essential for validation. This study underscores the need for improved screening methods for placental disorders, potentially aiding in early diagnosis and management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First- and Second-Trimester Aneuploidy Screening Biomarkers and Risk Assessment of Placenta Previa and Accreta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Mortaki MD , Athanasios Douligeris MD, MSc , Michail Panagiotopoulos MD, MSc , Maria-Anastasia Daskalaki MS , Vasilios Pergialiotis MD, MSc, PhD , Panagiotis Antsaklis MD, PhD , George Daskalakis MD, PhD , Marianna Theodora MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates differences in first and second-trimester maternal serum biomarkers for aneuploidy screening among women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, placenta previa, and those with normal placentation.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>A systematic review of 5 major databases up to April 2023 was conducted. Included were comparative studies analyzing mean biomarker levels in multiples of the median (MoM) among pregnant women with PAS, placenta previa, and uncomplicated pregnancies.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Both observational studies and randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction and Data Synthesis</h3><div>Analysis of 8 retrospective studies involving 1886 participants showed significant variances in biomarker levels. In the first trimester, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels were notably higher in the PAS group compared to the placenta previa group (731 patients, mean difference (MD) 0.48 MoM; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.73, <em>P</em> = 0.0001). Also, β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels were elevated in the placenta previa group compared to those with normal attachment (362 patients, MD 0.27 MoM; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.38, <em>P</em> < 0.00001). In the second trimester, alpha fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin levels were significantly increased in PAS patients compared to the placenta previa and normal groups, indicating potential markers for PAS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant differences in early pregnancy biomarker levels among women with PAS, placenta previa, and normal placentation were identified. These findings suggest potential for early screening, but further large-scale studies are essential for validation. This study underscores the need for improved screening methods for placental disorders, potentially aiding in early diagnosis and management strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
First- and Second-Trimester Aneuploidy Screening Biomarkers and Risk Assessment of Placenta Previa and Accreta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective
This study evaluates differences in first and second-trimester maternal serum biomarkers for aneuploidy screening among women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, placenta previa, and those with normal placentation.
Data Sources
A systematic review of 5 major databases up to April 2023 was conducted. Included were comparative studies analyzing mean biomarker levels in multiples of the median (MoM) among pregnant women with PAS, placenta previa, and uncomplicated pregnancies.
Study Selection
Both observational studies and randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis.
Data Extraction and Data Synthesis
Analysis of 8 retrospective studies involving 1886 participants showed significant variances in biomarker levels. In the first trimester, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels were notably higher in the PAS group compared to the placenta previa group (731 patients, mean difference (MD) 0.48 MoM; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.73, P = 0.0001). Also, β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels were elevated in the placenta previa group compared to those with normal attachment (362 patients, MD 0.27 MoM; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.38, P < 0.00001). In the second trimester, alpha fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin levels were significantly increased in PAS patients compared to the placenta previa and normal groups, indicating potential markers for PAS.
Conclusions
Significant differences in early pregnancy biomarker levels among women with PAS, placenta previa, and normal placentation were identified. These findings suggest potential for early screening, but further large-scale studies are essential for validation. This study underscores the need for improved screening methods for placental disorders, potentially aiding in early diagnosis and management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.