Chenchen Hua, Yi Zhuang, Miaoyan Wang, Ting Cai, Bin Xu, Shaowei Hao, Xiangming Fang, Liang Wang, Leting Zhou
{"title":"评估肾间质纤维化的可变翻转角度与改良锁相反转恢复对比研究","authors":"Chenchen Hua, Yi Zhuang, Miaoyan Wang, Ting Cai, Bin Xu, Shaowei Hao, Xiangming Fang, Liang Wang, Leting Zhou","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variable flip angle (VFA) and modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) are frequently used for noninvasive evaluation of renal interstitial fibrosis (IF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, controversy remains over which method is preferred.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic efficacy of VFA and MOLLI for T1 mapping in evaluating renal IF.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Fifty-one participants with CKD (CKD stage 1-5, 35 males) and 18 healthy volunteers (eight males).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3.0 T, three-dimensional gradient echo sequence for B1+ VFA, and two-dimensional gradient echo sequence for MOLLI.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Image quality was assessed on a five-point scale. Cortex and medulla T1 values (cT1 and mT1), corticomedullary T1 value difference (ΔT1, medulla - cortex), and corticomedullary T1 value ratio (ratio T1, cortex:medulla) were compared between VFA and MOLLI as well as between IF grade (0-4) based on biopsy.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristics analysis with the area under the curve (AUC). P-value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MOLLI provided significantly better image quality compared to VFA. cT1 and mT1 values significantly differed between VFA and MOLLI (cT1-VFA: 1771.4 ± 139.4 msec vs. cT1-MOLLI: 1729.9 ± 132.1 msec; mT1-VFA: 2076.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 2045.9-2129.9] msec vs. mT1-MOLLI: 2039.2 [IQR: 1997.8-2071.6] msec). ΔT1 and ratio T1 values were not different between VFA and MOLLI (ΔT1: 300.8 ± 71.4 vs. 306.0 ± 78.4, respectively, P = 0.33 and ratio T1: 0.85 ± 0.038 vs. 0.85 ± 0.041, respectively, P = 0.064). No difference was observed between T1 variables and T1 mapping methods in diagnosing IF.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>ΔT1 and ratio T1 were not different between VFA and MOLLI. Both VFA and MOLLI are effective for noninvasive assessment of renal IF.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study Between Variable Flip Angle and Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery for Evaluating Renal Interstitial Fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Chenchen Hua, Yi Zhuang, Miaoyan Wang, Ting Cai, Bin Xu, Shaowei Hao, Xiangming Fang, Liang Wang, Leting Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmri.29611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variable flip angle (VFA) and modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) are frequently used for noninvasive evaluation of renal interstitial fibrosis (IF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, controversy remains over which method is preferred.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic efficacy of VFA and MOLLI for T1 mapping in evaluating renal IF.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Fifty-one participants with CKD (CKD stage 1-5, 35 males) and 18 healthy volunteers (eight males).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3.0 T, three-dimensional gradient echo sequence for B1+ VFA, and two-dimensional gradient echo sequence for MOLLI.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Image quality was assessed on a five-point scale. Cortex and medulla T1 values (cT1 and mT1), corticomedullary T1 value difference (ΔT1, medulla - cortex), and corticomedullary T1 value ratio (ratio T1, cortex:medulla) were compared between VFA and MOLLI as well as between IF grade (0-4) based on biopsy.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristics analysis with the area under the curve (AUC). P-value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MOLLI provided significantly better image quality compared to VFA. cT1 and mT1 values significantly differed between VFA and MOLLI (cT1-VFA: 1771.4 ± 139.4 msec vs. cT1-MOLLI: 1729.9 ± 132.1 msec; mT1-VFA: 2076.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 2045.9-2129.9] msec vs. mT1-MOLLI: 2039.2 [IQR: 1997.8-2071.6] msec). ΔT1 and ratio T1 values were not different between VFA and MOLLI (ΔT1: 300.8 ± 71.4 vs. 306.0 ± 78.4, respectively, P = 0.33 and ratio T1: 0.85 ± 0.038 vs. 0.85 ± 0.041, respectively, P = 0.064). No difference was observed between T1 variables and T1 mapping methods in diagnosing IF.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>ΔT1 and ratio T1 were not different between VFA and MOLLI. Both VFA and MOLLI are effective for noninvasive assessment of renal IF.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29611\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study Between Variable Flip Angle and Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery for Evaluating Renal Interstitial Fibrosis.
Background: Variable flip angle (VFA) and modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) are frequently used for noninvasive evaluation of renal interstitial fibrosis (IF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, controversy remains over which method is preferred.
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of VFA and MOLLI for T1 mapping in evaluating renal IF.
Study type: Prospective.
Subjects: Fifty-one participants with CKD (CKD stage 1-5, 35 males) and 18 healthy volunteers (eight males).
Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T, three-dimensional gradient echo sequence for B1+ VFA, and two-dimensional gradient echo sequence for MOLLI.
Assessment: Image quality was assessed on a five-point scale. Cortex and medulla T1 values (cT1 and mT1), corticomedullary T1 value difference (ΔT1, medulla - cortex), and corticomedullary T1 value ratio (ratio T1, cortex:medulla) were compared between VFA and MOLLI as well as between IF grade (0-4) based on biopsy.
Statistical tests: Intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristics analysis with the area under the curve (AUC). P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: MOLLI provided significantly better image quality compared to VFA. cT1 and mT1 values significantly differed between VFA and MOLLI (cT1-VFA: 1771.4 ± 139.4 msec vs. cT1-MOLLI: 1729.9 ± 132.1 msec; mT1-VFA: 2076.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 2045.9-2129.9] msec vs. mT1-MOLLI: 2039.2 [IQR: 1997.8-2071.6] msec). ΔT1 and ratio T1 values were not different between VFA and MOLLI (ΔT1: 300.8 ± 71.4 vs. 306.0 ± 78.4, respectively, P = 0.33 and ratio T1: 0.85 ± 0.038 vs. 0.85 ± 0.041, respectively, P = 0.064). No difference was observed between T1 variables and T1 mapping methods in diagnosing IF.
Data conclusion: ΔT1 and ratio T1 were not different between VFA and MOLLI. Both VFA and MOLLI are effective for noninvasive assessment of renal IF.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
