翻转课堂是医科一年级本科生生理学教学的有效教育工具。

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1854_23
K Prabhavathi, P KalyaniPraba, P Rohini, K Thamarai Selvi, A Saravanan
{"title":"翻转课堂是医科一年级本科生生理学教学的有效教育工具。","authors":"K Prabhavathi, P KalyaniPraba, P Rohini, K Thamarai Selvi, A Saravanan","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1854_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flipped classroom (FC) teaching has recently received much attention in medical education. It has been introduced in our institution for 2 years, and we studied the effectiveness and perception of FC teaching in Physiology for first-year undergraduate students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 150 out of 250 first-year MBBS students participated in this study. They were divided into two groups, each consisting of 75 students. Multiple topics in the cardiovascular system were taught to the students by employing traditional classroom (TC) didactic lectures in group A. The same topics were handled using FC in group B, where the students came prepared with the study materials the facilitator provided before class commenced. A well-planned classroom discussion with a formative assessment was conducted at the end. The test scores were compared between the two groups by using an independent <i>t</i>-test. A feedback report was obtained from both groups' students to analyze the teaching-learning methods' accomplishment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>FC teaching scores were significantly higher than the traditional lecture among all students. Feedback results showed that 93% of students agreed that the resource materials, group discussions, videos, and exercise tools used in FC were very useful; 95% of students agreed that it provided a good understanding and better appreciation of basic science knowledge in health and disease, and 91% reported that it was well-organized with good interaction, clear explanation, relevant information, and encouraged critical thinking with active student participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FC proves to be an effective, interesting, and motivating teaching-learning module. It enhances communication skills, clinical thinking, interaction, and active student participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flipped classroom as an effective educational tool in teaching physiology for first-year undergraduate medical students.\",\"authors\":\"K Prabhavathi, P KalyaniPraba, P Rohini, K Thamarai Selvi, A Saravanan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1854_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flipped classroom (FC) teaching has recently received much attention in medical education. It has been introduced in our institution for 2 years, and we studied the effectiveness and perception of FC teaching in Physiology for first-year undergraduate students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 150 out of 250 first-year MBBS students participated in this study. They were divided into two groups, each consisting of 75 students. Multiple topics in the cardiovascular system were taught to the students by employing traditional classroom (TC) didactic lectures in group A. The same topics were handled using FC in group B, where the students came prepared with the study materials the facilitator provided before class commenced. A well-planned classroom discussion with a formative assessment was conducted at the end. The test scores were compared between the two groups by using an independent <i>t</i>-test. A feedback report was obtained from both groups' students to analyze the teaching-learning methods' accomplishment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>FC teaching scores were significantly higher than the traditional lecture among all students. Feedback results showed that 93% of students agreed that the resource materials, group discussions, videos, and exercise tools used in FC were very useful; 95% of students agreed that it provided a good understanding and better appreciation of basic science knowledge in health and disease, and 91% reported that it was well-organized with good interaction, clear explanation, relevant information, and encouraged critical thinking with active student participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FC proves to be an effective, interesting, and motivating teaching-learning module. It enhances communication skills, clinical thinking, interaction, and active student participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414885/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1854_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1854_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:翻转课堂(FC)教学最近在医学教育中受到广泛关注。我们研究了一年级本科生在生理学中使用翻转课堂教学的效果和感知:在 250 名医学学士学位一年级学生中,共有 150 人参与了本研究。他们被分为两组,每组 75 人。A 组采用传统课堂(TC)讲授法,向学生讲授心血管系统的多个主题;B 组采用 FC 讲授法,同样的主题,学生在上课前准备好主持人提供的学习材料。最后进行了精心策划的课堂讨论和形成性评估。两组学生的考试成绩通过独立的 t 检验进行比较。从两组学生处获得反馈报告,以分析教学方法的效果:在所有学生中,FC 教学法的得分明显高于传统讲授法。反馈结果显示,93%的学生认为FC教学中使用的资源材料、小组讨论、视频和练习工具非常有用;95%的学生认为FC教学让学生很好地理解和更好地领会了健康与疾病的基础科学知识;91%的学生认为FC教学组织有序,互动良好,讲解清晰,信息相关,鼓励批判性思维,学生参与积极:结论:实践证明,FC 是一种有效、有趣且具有激励作用的教学模块。结论:事实证明,FC 是一种有效、有趣且能激发学生积极性的教学模块,它能提高学生的沟通技巧、临床思维能力、互动能力和积极参与能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flipped classroom as an effective educational tool in teaching physiology for first-year undergraduate medical students.

Background: Flipped classroom (FC) teaching has recently received much attention in medical education. It has been introduced in our institution for 2 years, and we studied the effectiveness and perception of FC teaching in Physiology for first-year undergraduate students.

Materials and methods: In total, 150 out of 250 first-year MBBS students participated in this study. They were divided into two groups, each consisting of 75 students. Multiple topics in the cardiovascular system were taught to the students by employing traditional classroom (TC) didactic lectures in group A. The same topics were handled using FC in group B, where the students came prepared with the study materials the facilitator provided before class commenced. A well-planned classroom discussion with a formative assessment was conducted at the end. The test scores were compared between the two groups by using an independent t-test. A feedback report was obtained from both groups' students to analyze the teaching-learning methods' accomplishment.

Result: FC teaching scores were significantly higher than the traditional lecture among all students. Feedback results showed that 93% of students agreed that the resource materials, group discussions, videos, and exercise tools used in FC were very useful; 95% of students agreed that it provided a good understanding and better appreciation of basic science knowledge in health and disease, and 91% reported that it was well-organized with good interaction, clear explanation, relevant information, and encouraged critical thinking with active student participation.

Conclusion: FC proves to be an effective, interesting, and motivating teaching-learning module. It enhances communication skills, clinical thinking, interaction, and active student participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信