RIRS 中的输尿管通路鞘:一项回顾性、比较性、单中心研究。

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Giuseppe Celentano, Biagio Barone, Roberto La Rocca, Matteo Massanova, Luigi Napolitano, Domenico Prezioso, Marco Abate, Benito Fabio Mirto, Ferdinando Fusco, Felice Crocetto
{"title":"RIRS 中的输尿管通路鞘:一项回顾性、比较性、单中心研究。","authors":"Giuseppe Celentano, Biagio Barone, Roberto La Rocca, Matteo Massanova, Luigi Napolitano, Domenico Prezioso, Marco Abate, Benito Fabio Mirto, Ferdinando Fusco, Felice Crocetto","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2024-0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) in reducing operative time and complications, as well as improving stone-free rates (SFR), while assessing their overall safety and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data regarding 234 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stones up to 3 cm between January 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. About 52.5 % of procedures were performed utilizing a UAS. Differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate, and complications were analyzed between procedures with and without UAS and stratified, according to stone burden size, into three groups (Group A: 0.5-1 cm; Group B: 1-2 cm; Group C: 2-3 cm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative time, fluoroscopy time, and residual fragments size were lower in RIRS without UAS, respectively, 54.27 ± 24.02 vs. 62.23 ± 22.66 min (p=0.010), 2.72 ± 0.89 vs. 4.44 ± 1.67 min (p<0.0001), and 3.85 ± 0.813 vs. 4.60 ± 0.83 mm (p=0.011). Considering stone burden, operative time was lower in RIRS without UAS for Group A (36.40 ± 8.555 vs. 46.05 ± 6.332 min) (p<0.0001) while higher for Group B (60.39 ± 18.785 vs. 50.14 ± 5.812 min) (p=0.002). Similarly, fluoroscopy time was lower in RIRS without UAS in every group, respectively, 2.11 ± 0.34 vs. 2.74 ± 0.57 min (p<0.0001), 2.94 ± 0.51 vs. 4.72 ± 0.37 min (p<0.0001), and 3.78 ± 1.26 vs. 6.79 ± 1.17 min (p<0.0001). Only Group C had a statistically significant difference in residual fragment size without UAS (3.89 ± 0.782 vs. 4.75 ± 0.886 mm) (p=0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UAS should be carefully evaluated considering the increased fluoroscopy time and the differences in operative time related to different stone burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ureteral access sheaths in RIRS: a retrospective, comparative, single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Celentano, Biagio Barone, Roberto La Rocca, Matteo Massanova, Luigi Napolitano, Domenico Prezioso, Marco Abate, Benito Fabio Mirto, Ferdinando Fusco, Felice Crocetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jbcpp-2024-0142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) in reducing operative time and complications, as well as improving stone-free rates (SFR), while assessing their overall safety and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data regarding 234 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stones up to 3 cm between January 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. About 52.5 % of procedures were performed utilizing a UAS. Differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate, and complications were analyzed between procedures with and without UAS and stratified, according to stone burden size, into three groups (Group A: 0.5-1 cm; Group B: 1-2 cm; Group C: 2-3 cm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative time, fluoroscopy time, and residual fragments size were lower in RIRS without UAS, respectively, 54.27 ± 24.02 vs. 62.23 ± 22.66 min (p=0.010), 2.72 ± 0.89 vs. 4.44 ± 1.67 min (p<0.0001), and 3.85 ± 0.813 vs. 4.60 ± 0.83 mm (p=0.011). Considering stone burden, operative time was lower in RIRS without UAS for Group A (36.40 ± 8.555 vs. 46.05 ± 6.332 min) (p<0.0001) while higher for Group B (60.39 ± 18.785 vs. 50.14 ± 5.812 min) (p=0.002). Similarly, fluoroscopy time was lower in RIRS without UAS in every group, respectively, 2.11 ± 0.34 vs. 2.74 ± 0.57 min (p<0.0001), 2.94 ± 0.51 vs. 4.72 ± 0.37 min (p<0.0001), and 3.78 ± 1.26 vs. 6.79 ± 1.17 min (p<0.0001). Only Group C had a statistically significant difference in residual fragment size without UAS (3.89 ± 0.782 vs. 4.75 ± 0.886 mm) (p=0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UAS should be carefully evaluated considering the increased fluoroscopy time and the differences in operative time related to different stone burdens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2024-0142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2024-0142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估输尿管通道鞘(UAS)在缩短手术时间、减少并发症、提高无结石率(SFR)方面的作用,同时评估其整体安全性和效率:评估输尿管通道鞘(UAS)在缩短手术时间、减少并发症、提高无结石率(SFR)方面的应用,同时评估其整体安全性和效率:回顾性分析了2017年1月至2020年3月期间234名接受逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗3厘米以下结石患者的数据。约52.5%的手术是利用无人机系统进行的。分析了使用和未使用UAS的手术在手术时间、透视时间、无石率和并发症方面的差异,并根据结石大小分为三组(A组:0.5-1厘米;B组:1-2厘米;C组:2-3厘米):结果:不使用 UAS 的 RIRS 的手术时间、透视时间和残留碎片大小分别为:54.27 ± 24.02 分钟 vs 62.23 ± 22.66 分钟(P=0.010)、2.72 ± 0.89 分钟 vs 4.44 ± 1.67 分钟(P结论:考虑到结石的大小,应谨慎评估 UAS:考虑到透视时间的增加以及与不同结石负荷相关的手术时间差异,应仔细评估 UAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ureteral access sheaths in RIRS: a retrospective, comparative, single-center study.

Objectives: To evaluate the use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS) in reducing operative time and complications, as well as improving stone-free rates (SFR), while assessing their overall safety and efficiency.

Methods: Data regarding 234 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stones up to 3 cm between January 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. About 52.5 % of procedures were performed utilizing a UAS. Differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate, and complications were analyzed between procedures with and without UAS and stratified, according to stone burden size, into three groups (Group A: 0.5-1 cm; Group B: 1-2 cm; Group C: 2-3 cm).

Results: Operative time, fluoroscopy time, and residual fragments size were lower in RIRS without UAS, respectively, 54.27 ± 24.02 vs. 62.23 ± 22.66 min (p=0.010), 2.72 ± 0.89 vs. 4.44 ± 1.67 min (p<0.0001), and 3.85 ± 0.813 vs. 4.60 ± 0.83 mm (p=0.011). Considering stone burden, operative time was lower in RIRS without UAS for Group A (36.40 ± 8.555 vs. 46.05 ± 6.332 min) (p<0.0001) while higher for Group B (60.39 ± 18.785 vs. 50.14 ± 5.812 min) (p=0.002). Similarly, fluoroscopy time was lower in RIRS without UAS in every group, respectively, 2.11 ± 0.34 vs. 2.74 ± 0.57 min (p<0.0001), 2.94 ± 0.51 vs. 4.72 ± 0.37 min (p<0.0001), and 3.78 ± 1.26 vs. 6.79 ± 1.17 min (p<0.0001). Only Group C had a statistically significant difference in residual fragment size without UAS (3.89 ± 0.782 vs. 4.75 ± 0.886 mm) (p=0.050).

Conclusions: UAS should be carefully evaluated considering the increased fluoroscopy time and the differences in operative time related to different stone burdens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信