评估empagliflozin在预防经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者心肌损伤方面的作用:双盲随机临床试验。

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hossein Behzad, Sina Mashayekhi, Hila Asham, Parvin Sarbakhsh, Taher Entezari-Maleki
{"title":"评估empagliflozin在预防经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者心肌损伤方面的作用:双盲随机临床试验。","authors":"Hossein Behzad, Sina Mashayekhi, Hila Asham, Parvin Sarbakhsh, Taher Entezari-Maleki","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.33103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is a fundamental procedure for coronary artery disease management, yet the risk of adverse events such periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) persists. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury during PCI procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups A and B; Group A as the intervention group received empagliflozin 25 mg 24 hours before and empagliflozin 10 mg 1-2 hours before coronary intervention and group Bas the control group received placebo at similar intervals. The primary outcome involved comparing baseline, 8-hour, and 24-hour cTnI and baseline and 24-hour hs-CRP levels after PCI in both groups to measure the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and anti-inflammatory effects of empagliflozin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline cTnI levels with <i>P</i>=0.955, 8 hours after PCI with <i>P</i>=0.469, and 24 hours after the intervention with <i>P</i>=0.980 were not statistically different in the two groups. Baseline levels of hs-CRP in both intervention and control groups were not statistically significantly different (<i>P</i>=0.982). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in hs-CRP levels 24 hours after PCI in two groups (<i>P</i>=0.198). Finally, the results showed that MACEs did not occur in any of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this trial could not express the advantages of acute pretreatment with empagliflozin in preventing PCI-related myocardial injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":"16 2","pages":"113-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effects of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Behzad, Sina Mashayekhi, Hila Asham, Parvin Sarbakhsh, Taher Entezari-Maleki\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jcvtr.33103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is a fundamental procedure for coronary artery disease management, yet the risk of adverse events such periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) persists. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury during PCI procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups A and B; Group A as the intervention group received empagliflozin 25 mg 24 hours before and empagliflozin 10 mg 1-2 hours before coronary intervention and group Bas the control group received placebo at similar intervals. The primary outcome involved comparing baseline, 8-hour, and 24-hour cTnI and baseline and 24-hour hs-CRP levels after PCI in both groups to measure the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and anti-inflammatory effects of empagliflozin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline cTnI levels with <i>P</i>=0.955, 8 hours after PCI with <i>P</i>=0.469, and 24 hours after the intervention with <i>P</i>=0.980 were not statistically different in the two groups. Baseline levels of hs-CRP in both intervention and control groups were not statistically significantly different (<i>P</i>=0.982). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in hs-CRP levels 24 hours after PCI in two groups (<i>P</i>=0.198). Finally, the results showed that MACEs did not occur in any of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this trial could not express the advantages of acute pretreatment with empagliflozin in preventing PCI-related myocardial injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"113-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.33103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.33103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是冠状动脉疾病治疗的基本程序,但其不良事件如围手术期心肌损伤(PMI)的风险依然存在。这项双盲随机临床试验旨在评估empagliflozin对预防PCI术中心肌损伤的疗效:共90名患者被随机分配到A、B两组;A组作为干预组,在冠状动脉介入治疗前24小时服用25毫克的恩格列净,在介入治疗前1-2小时服用10毫克的恩格列净;Bas组作为对照组,在相似的时间间隔内服用安慰剂。主要结果是比较两组患者PCI后的基线、8小时和24小时cTnI以及基线和24小时hs-CRP水平,以衡量围术期心肌损伤(PMI)的发生率和empagliflozin的抗炎作用:两组基线cTnI水平(P=0.955)、PCI术后8小时(P=0.469)和介入术后24小时(P=0.980)均无统计学差异。干预组和对照组的 hs-CRP 基线水平差异无统计学意义(P=0.982)。此外,PCI术后24小时两组的hs-CRP水平也无统计学差异(P=0.198)。最后,结果显示,两组患者均未发生 MACE:这项试验的结果并不能说明急性期使用恩格列净预处理在预防 PCI 相关心肌损伤方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the effects of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Introduction: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is a fundamental procedure for coronary artery disease management, yet the risk of adverse events such periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) persists. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of empagliflozin in preventing myocardial injury during PCI procedure.

Methods: A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups A and B; Group A as the intervention group received empagliflozin 25 mg 24 hours before and empagliflozin 10 mg 1-2 hours before coronary intervention and group Bas the control group received placebo at similar intervals. The primary outcome involved comparing baseline, 8-hour, and 24-hour cTnI and baseline and 24-hour hs-CRP levels after PCI in both groups to measure the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and anti-inflammatory effects of empagliflozin.

Results: Baseline cTnI levels with P=0.955, 8 hours after PCI with P=0.469, and 24 hours after the intervention with P=0.980 were not statistically different in the two groups. Baseline levels of hs-CRP in both intervention and control groups were not statistically significantly different (P=0.982). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in hs-CRP levels 24 hours after PCI in two groups (P=0.198). Finally, the results showed that MACEs did not occur in any of the groups.

Conclusion: The results of this trial could not express the advantages of acute pretreatment with empagliflozin in preventing PCI-related myocardial injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信