放射线发射金属支架治疗无法切除的铋型 III 或 IV 胆管周围癌:一项多中心随机试验。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Qi Chen, Nai-Jian Ge, Yu-Liang Li, Ming Huang, Wen-Hui Li, Dong Lu, Ning Wei, Peng-Hua Lv, Jian-Fei Tu, Cheng-Jian He, Wu-Jie Wang, Rong Ding, Bo Peng, Xue-Jun Wang, Fu-An Wang, Guang-Yu Zhu, Yong Wang, Li Chen, Jie Min, Jin-He Guo, Gao-Jun Teng, Jian Lu
{"title":"放射线发射金属支架治疗无法切除的铋型 III 或 IV 胆管周围癌:一项多中心随机试验。","authors":"Qi Chen, Nai-Jian Ge, Yu-Liang Li, Ming Huang, Wen-Hui Li, Dong Lu, Ning Wei, Peng-Hua Lv, Jian-Fei Tu, Cheng-Jian He, Wu-Jie Wang, Rong Ding, Bo Peng, Xue-Jun Wang, Fu-An Wang, Guang-Yu Zhu, Yong Wang, Li Chen, Jie Min, Jin-He Guo, Gao-Jun Teng, Jian Lu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background aims: </strong>Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been recommended for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction while radiation-emitting metallic stents (REMSs) loaded with 125I seeds have recently been approved to provide longer patency and overall survival in malignant biliary tract obstruction. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REMS plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (REMS-HAIC) versus SEMS plus HAIC (SEMS-HAIC) for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA between March 2021 and January 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either REMS-HAIC or SEMS-HAIC using permuted block randomization, with a block size of six. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), stent patency, relief of jaundice, quality of life, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population, with 63 in each group. The median OS was 10.2 months versus 6.7 months (P=0.002). The median TTSP was 8.6 months versus 5.4 months (P=0.003). The median stent patency was longer in the REMS-HAIC group than in the SEMS-HAIC group (P=0.001). The REMS-HAIC group showed better improvement in physical functioning scale (P<0.05) and fatigue symptoms (P<0.05) when compared to the SEMS-HAIC group. No significant differences were observed in relief of jaundice (85.7% vs. 84.1%; P=0.803) or the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (9.8% vs. 11.9%; P=0.721).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REMS plus HAIC showed better OS, TTSP, and stent patency compared with SEMS plus HAIC in patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA with an acceptable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation-Emitting metallic stent for unresectable bismuth type III or IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Chen, Nai-Jian Ge, Yu-Liang Li, Ming Huang, Wen-Hui Li, Dong Lu, Ning Wei, Peng-Hua Lv, Jian-Fei Tu, Cheng-Jian He, Wu-Jie Wang, Rong Ding, Bo Peng, Xue-Jun Wang, Fu-An Wang, Guang-Yu Zhu, Yong Wang, Li Chen, Jie Min, Jin-He Guo, Gao-Jun Teng, Jian Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background aims: </strong>Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been recommended for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction while radiation-emitting metallic stents (REMSs) loaded with 125I seeds have recently been approved to provide longer patency and overall survival in malignant biliary tract obstruction. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REMS plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (REMS-HAIC) versus SEMS plus HAIC (SEMS-HAIC) for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA between March 2021 and January 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either REMS-HAIC or SEMS-HAIC using permuted block randomization, with a block size of six. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), stent patency, relief of jaundice, quality of life, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population, with 63 in each group. The median OS was 10.2 months versus 6.7 months (P=0.002). The median TTSP was 8.6 months versus 5.4 months (P=0.003). The median stent patency was longer in the REMS-HAIC group than in the SEMS-HAIC group (P=0.001). The REMS-HAIC group showed better improvement in physical functioning scale (P<0.05) and fatigue symptoms (P<0.05) when compared to the SEMS-HAIC group. No significant differences were observed in relief of jaundice (85.7% vs. 84.1%; P=0.803) or the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (9.8% vs. 11.9%; P=0.721).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REMS plus HAIC showed better OS, TTSP, and stent patency compared with SEMS plus HAIC in patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA with an acceptable safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目的:自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)已被推荐用于治疗无法切除的恶性胆道梗阻患者,而装载125I粒子的放射发射金属支架(REMS)最近已被批准用于延长恶性胆道梗阻的通畅时间和总生存期。本试验旨在评估REMS加肝动脉灌注化疗(REMS-HAIC)与SEMS加HAIC(SEMS-HAIC)治疗不可切除的肝周胆管癌(pCCA)的有效性和安全性:这项多中心随机对照试验招募了2021年3月至2023年1月期间不可切除的铋型III或IV期pCCA患者。患者按照1:1的比例被随机分配到REMS-HAIC或SEMS-HAIC治疗方案中。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点为症状进展时间(TTSP)、支架通畅率、黄疸缓解率、生活质量和安全性:共有126名患者被纳入意向治疗人群,每组63人。中位OS为10.2个月对6.7个月(P=0.002)。中位TTSP为8.6个月对5.4个月(P=0.003)。REMS-HAIC组的中位支架通畅时间长于SEMS-HAIC组(P=0.001)。REMS-HAIC组在身体功能量表(PConclusion:与SEMS加HAIC相比,REMS加HAIC在不可切除的铋型III或IV pCCA患者中显示出更好的OS、TTSP和支架通畅率,且安全性可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation-Emitting metallic stent for unresectable bismuth type III or IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter randomized trial.

Background aims: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been recommended for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction while radiation-emitting metallic stents (REMSs) loaded with 125I seeds have recently been approved to provide longer patency and overall survival in malignant biliary tract obstruction. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REMS plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (REMS-HAIC) versus SEMS plus HAIC (SEMS-HAIC) for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA).

Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA between March 2021 and January 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either REMS-HAIC or SEMS-HAIC using permuted block randomization, with a block size of six. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), stent patency, relief of jaundice, quality of life, and safety.

Results: A total of 126 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population, with 63 in each group. The median OS was 10.2 months versus 6.7 months (P=0.002). The median TTSP was 8.6 months versus 5.4 months (P=0.003). The median stent patency was longer in the REMS-HAIC group than in the SEMS-HAIC group (P=0.001). The REMS-HAIC group showed better improvement in physical functioning scale (P<0.05) and fatigue symptoms (P<0.05) when compared to the SEMS-HAIC group. No significant differences were observed in relief of jaundice (85.7% vs. 84.1%; P=0.803) or the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (9.8% vs. 11.9%; P=0.721).

Conclusion: REMS plus HAIC showed better OS, TTSP, and stent patency compared with SEMS plus HAIC in patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA with an acceptable safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信