全腹铅笔束扫描质子 FLASH 增加了急性致死率。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Brett I Bell, Christian Velten, Michael Pennock, Minglei Kang, Kathryn E Tanaka, Balaji Selvaraj, Alexander Bookbinder, Wade Koba, Justin Vercellino, Jeb English, Beata Małachowska, Sanjay Pandey, Phaneendra K Duddempudi, Yunjie Yang, Shahin Shajahan, Shaakir Hasan, J Isabelle Choi, Charles B Simone, Weng-Lang Yang, Wolfgang A Tomé, Haibo Lin, Chandan Guha
{"title":"全腹铅笔束扫描质子 FLASH 增加了急性致死率。","authors":"Brett I Bell, Christian Velten, Michael Pennock, Minglei Kang, Kathryn E Tanaka, Balaji Selvaraj, Alexander Bookbinder, Wade Koba, Justin Vercellino, Jeb English, Beata Małachowska, Sanjay Pandey, Phaneendra K Duddempudi, Yunjie Yang, Shahin Shajahan, Shaakir Hasan, J Isabelle Choi, Charles B Simone, Weng-Lang Yang, Wolfgang A Tomé, Haibo Lin, Chandan Guha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy has emerged as a modality that promises to reduce normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Previous studies of gastrointestinal toxicity using passively scattered FLASH proton therapy (PRT) have, however, yielded mixed results, suggesting that the requirements for gastrointestinal sparing by FLASH are an open question. Furthermore, the more clinically relevant pencil beam scanned (PBS) FLASH PRT has not yet been assessed in this context, despite differences in the spatiotemporal dose-rate distributions compared with passively scattered PRT. Here, to our knowledge, we provide the first report on the effects of PBS FLASH PRT on acute gastrointestinal injury in mice after whole abdominal irradiation.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Whole abdominal irradiation was performed on C57BL/6J mice using the entrance channel of the Bragg curve of a 250 MeV PBS proton beam at field-averaged dose rates of 0.6 Gy/s for conventional (CONV) and 80 to 100 Gy/s for FLASH PRT. A 2D strip ionization chamber array was used to measure the dose and dose rate for each mouse. Survival was assessed at 14 Gy. Intestines were harvested and processed as Swiss rolls for analysis using a novel artificial intelligence-based crypt assay to quantify crypt regeneration 4 days after irradiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival was significantly reduced after 14 Gy FLASH PRT compared with CONV (P < .001). Our artificial intelligence-based crypt assays demonstrated no significant difference in intestinal crypts/cm or crypt depth between groups 4 days after irradiation. Furthermore, we found no significant difference in 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine<sup>+</sup> cells/crypt or Olfactomedin4<sup>+</sup> intestinal stem cells with FLASH relative to CONV PRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our data demonstrate significantly impaired survival after abdominal PBS FLASH PRT without apparent differences in intestinal histology 4 days after irradiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":"493-505"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole Abdominal Pencil Beam Scanned Proton FLASH Increases Acute Lethality.\",\"authors\":\"Brett I Bell, Christian Velten, Michael Pennock, Minglei Kang, Kathryn E Tanaka, Balaji Selvaraj, Alexander Bookbinder, Wade Koba, Justin Vercellino, Jeb English, Beata Małachowska, Sanjay Pandey, Phaneendra K Duddempudi, Yunjie Yang, Shahin Shajahan, Shaakir Hasan, J Isabelle Choi, Charles B Simone, Weng-Lang Yang, Wolfgang A Tomé, Haibo Lin, Chandan Guha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy has emerged as a modality that promises to reduce normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Previous studies of gastrointestinal toxicity using passively scattered FLASH proton therapy (PRT) have, however, yielded mixed results, suggesting that the requirements for gastrointestinal sparing by FLASH are an open question. Furthermore, the more clinically relevant pencil beam scanned (PBS) FLASH PRT has not yet been assessed in this context, despite differences in the spatiotemporal dose-rate distributions compared with passively scattered PRT. Here, to our knowledge, we provide the first report on the effects of PBS FLASH PRT on acute gastrointestinal injury in mice after whole abdominal irradiation.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Whole abdominal irradiation was performed on C57BL/6J mice using the entrance channel of the Bragg curve of a 250 MeV PBS proton beam at field-averaged dose rates of 0.6 Gy/s for conventional (CONV) and 80 to 100 Gy/s for FLASH PRT. A 2D strip ionization chamber array was used to measure the dose and dose rate for each mouse. Survival was assessed at 14 Gy. Intestines were harvested and processed as Swiss rolls for analysis using a novel artificial intelligence-based crypt assay to quantify crypt regeneration 4 days after irradiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival was significantly reduced after 14 Gy FLASH PRT compared with CONV (P < .001). Our artificial intelligence-based crypt assays demonstrated no significant difference in intestinal crypts/cm or crypt depth between groups 4 days after irradiation. Furthermore, we found no significant difference in 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine<sup>+</sup> cells/crypt or Olfactomedin4<sup>+</sup> intestinal stem cells with FLASH relative to CONV PRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our data demonstrate significantly impaired survival after abdominal PBS FLASH PRT without apparent differences in intestinal histology 4 days after irradiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"493-505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:超高剂量率 FLASH 放射治疗(RT)已成为一种有望在保持肿瘤控制的同时减少正常组织毒性的治疗方式。然而,以前使用被动散射 FLASH 质子疗法(PRT)对胃肠道毒性进行的研究结果不一,这表明 FLASH 对胃肠道疏通的要求是一个未决问题。此外,与临床更相关的铅笔束扫描(PBS)FLASH PRT 尽管在时空剂量率分布上与被动散射 PRT 有所不同,但尚未在此背景下进行评估。在此,我们首次报告了 PBS FLASH PRT 对全腹照射后小鼠急性胃肠道损伤的影响:利用 250 MeV PBS 质子束布拉格曲线的入口通道对 C57BL/6J 小鼠进行了全腹辐照,常规(CONV)的场均剂量率为 0.6 Gy/s,FLASH PRT 的场均剂量率为 80-100 Gy/s。二维条状电离室阵列用于测量每只小鼠的剂量和剂量率。存活率在 14 Gy 时进行评估。使用基于人工智能(AI)的新型隐窝分析法对肠道进行收获和处理,以量化辐照后 4 天的隐窝再生情况:结果:与CONV PRT相比,14 Gy FLASH PRT后的存活率明显降低(P+细胞/隐窝或Olfactomedin4+肠干细胞与FLASH PRT相对于CONV PRT):总之,我们的数据表明,腹部 PBS FLASH PRT 后的存活率明显下降,但照射后 4 天的肠道组织学无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole Abdominal Pencil Beam Scanned Proton FLASH Increases Acute Lethality.

Purpose: Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy has emerged as a modality that promises to reduce normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Previous studies of gastrointestinal toxicity using passively scattered FLASH proton therapy (PRT) have, however, yielded mixed results, suggesting that the requirements for gastrointestinal sparing by FLASH are an open question. Furthermore, the more clinically relevant pencil beam scanned (PBS) FLASH PRT has not yet been assessed in this context, despite differences in the spatiotemporal dose-rate distributions compared with passively scattered PRT. Here, to our knowledge, we provide the first report on the effects of PBS FLASH PRT on acute gastrointestinal injury in mice after whole abdominal irradiation.

Methods and materials: Whole abdominal irradiation was performed on C57BL/6J mice using the entrance channel of the Bragg curve of a 250 MeV PBS proton beam at field-averaged dose rates of 0.6 Gy/s for conventional (CONV) and 80 to 100 Gy/s for FLASH PRT. A 2D strip ionization chamber array was used to measure the dose and dose rate for each mouse. Survival was assessed at 14 Gy. Intestines were harvested and processed as Swiss rolls for analysis using a novel artificial intelligence-based crypt assay to quantify crypt regeneration 4 days after irradiation.

Results: Survival was significantly reduced after 14 Gy FLASH PRT compared with CONV (P < .001). Our artificial intelligence-based crypt assays demonstrated no significant difference in intestinal crypts/cm or crypt depth between groups 4 days after irradiation. Furthermore, we found no significant difference in 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine+ cells/crypt or Olfactomedin4+ intestinal stem cells with FLASH relative to CONV PRT.

Conclusions: Overall, our data demonstrate significantly impaired survival after abdominal PBS FLASH PRT without apparent differences in intestinal histology 4 days after irradiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信