{"title":"利用纳米孔测序技术检测结核分枝杆菌对利奈唑胺的表型耐药性与 rrl 和 rplC 基因突变之间的一致性","authors":"Senjuti Sengupta, Parul Jain, Rashmi Ratnam, Bhoopendra Kumar Pandey, Urmila Singh, Vijay Kumar, Ashutosh Paliwal, Amita Jain","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is considered the gold standard for detecting linezolid (LZD) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), but it is time-consuming. Nanopore sequencing offers a potentially faster alternative approach. This study evaluated the agreement between phenotypically detected LZD resistance and mutations in the rrl and rplC genes of MTB isolates using nanopore sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive drug-resistant MTB isolates from pulmonary samples collected in 2021 underwent liquid culture (LC) DST for LZD. All resistant isolates and an equal number of susceptible isolates were subjected to targeted sequencing of the rrl and rplC genes using nanopore technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sequencing identified a C154R mutation in the rplC gene in only one LZD-resistant isolate. No mutations were detected in the rrl gene. The agreement between sequencing and LC-DST for detecting LZD resistance was poor (Cohen's kappa: 0.03571, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.034-0.105). Additionally, no significant association was found between LZD resistance and clinical or microbiological outcomes at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed a considerable discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic detection of LZD resistance in MTB. Further research is needed to better understand the genetic mechanisms underlying LZD resistance and to develop reliable molecular diagnostics for rapid resistance detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":"13 3","pages":"331-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between Phenotypically Detected Linezolid Resistance and Mutations in rrl and rplC Genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Using Nanopore Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Senjuti Sengupta, Parul Jain, Rashmi Ratnam, Bhoopendra Kumar Pandey, Urmila Singh, Vijay Kumar, Ashutosh Paliwal, Amita Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is considered the gold standard for detecting linezolid (LZD) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), but it is time-consuming. Nanopore sequencing offers a potentially faster alternative approach. This study evaluated the agreement between phenotypically detected LZD resistance and mutations in the rrl and rplC genes of MTB isolates using nanopore sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive drug-resistant MTB isolates from pulmonary samples collected in 2021 underwent liquid culture (LC) DST for LZD. All resistant isolates and an equal number of susceptible isolates were subjected to targeted sequencing of the rrl and rplC genes using nanopore technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sequencing identified a C154R mutation in the rplC gene in only one LZD-resistant isolate. No mutations were detected in the rrl gene. The agreement between sequencing and LC-DST for detecting LZD resistance was poor (Cohen's kappa: 0.03571, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.034-0.105). Additionally, no significant association was found between LZD resistance and clinical or microbiological outcomes at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed a considerable discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic detection of LZD resistance in MTB. Further research is needed to better understand the genetic mechanisms underlying LZD resistance and to develop reliable molecular diagnostics for rapid resistance detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mycobacteriology\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"331-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mycobacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agreement between Phenotypically Detected Linezolid Resistance and Mutations in rrl and rplC Genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Using Nanopore Sequencing.
Background: Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is considered the gold standard for detecting linezolid (LZD) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), but it is time-consuming. Nanopore sequencing offers a potentially faster alternative approach. This study evaluated the agreement between phenotypically detected LZD resistance and mutations in the rrl and rplC genes of MTB isolates using nanopore sequencing.
Methods: Consecutive drug-resistant MTB isolates from pulmonary samples collected in 2021 underwent liquid culture (LC) DST for LZD. All resistant isolates and an equal number of susceptible isolates were subjected to targeted sequencing of the rrl and rplC genes using nanopore technology.
Results: Sequencing identified a C154R mutation in the rplC gene in only one LZD-resistant isolate. No mutations were detected in the rrl gene. The agreement between sequencing and LC-DST for detecting LZD resistance was poor (Cohen's kappa: 0.03571, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.034-0.105). Additionally, no significant association was found between LZD resistance and clinical or microbiological outcomes at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion: This study revealed a considerable discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic detection of LZD resistance in MTB. Further research is needed to better understand the genetic mechanisms underlying LZD resistance and to develop reliable molecular diagnostics for rapid resistance detection.