评估在磁共振引导下对下肢和骨盆软组织肉瘤进行热疗时的磁共振测温性能。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Hyperthermia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105
Spyridon N Karkavitsas, Marianne Göger-Neff, Maria Kawula, Kemal Sumser, Benjamin Zilles, Martin Wadepohl, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz, Wolfgang G Kunz, Olaf Dietrich, Lars H Lindner, Margarethus M Paulides
{"title":"评估在磁共振引导下对下肢和骨盆软组织肉瘤进行热疗时的磁共振测温性能。","authors":"Spyridon N Karkavitsas, Marianne Göger-Neff, Maria Kawula, Kemal Sumser, Benjamin Zilles, Martin Wadepohl, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz, Wolfgang G Kunz, Olaf Dietrich, Lars H Lindner, Margarethus M Paulides","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regional HT and chemotherapy. Pairs of double-echo gradient-echo scans were acquired during the MR protocol 1.4 s apart. For each pair, precision was quantified using phase data from both echoes ('dual-echo') or only one ('single-echo') in- or excluding body fat pixels in the field drift correction region of interest. The precision of each method was compared to that of the MRT approach using a built-in clinical software tool (SigmaVision). Accuracy was assessed in three lower-extremity patients (six treatments) using interstitial temperature probes. The Jaccard coefficient quantified pretreatment motion; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed its predictability for acceptable precision (<1 °C) during HT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the built-in dual-echo approach, single-echo thermometry improved the mean temporal precision from 1.32 ± 0.40 °C to 1.07 ± 0.34 °C (pelvis) and from 0.99 ± 0.28 °C to 0.76 ± 0.23 °C (lower extremities). With body fat-based field drift correction, single-echo mean accuracy improved from 1.4 °C to 1.0 °C. Pretreatment bulk motion provided excellent precision prediction with an area under the curve of 0.80-0.86 (pelvis) and 0.81-0.83 (lower extremities), compared to gastrointestinal air motion (0.52-0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-echo MRT exhibited better precision than dual-echo MRT. Body fat-based field-drift correction significantly improved MRT accuracy. Pretreatment bulk motion showed improved prediction of acceptable MRT temporal precision over gastrointestinal air motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","volume":"41 1","pages":"2405105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis.\",\"authors\":\"Spyridon N Karkavitsas, Marianne Göger-Neff, Maria Kawula, Kemal Sumser, Benjamin Zilles, Martin Wadepohl, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz, Wolfgang G Kunz, Olaf Dietrich, Lars H Lindner, Margarethus M Paulides\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regional HT and chemotherapy. Pairs of double-echo gradient-echo scans were acquired during the MR protocol 1.4 s apart. For each pair, precision was quantified using phase data from both echoes ('dual-echo') or only one ('single-echo') in- or excluding body fat pixels in the field drift correction region of interest. The precision of each method was compared to that of the MRT approach using a built-in clinical software tool (SigmaVision). Accuracy was assessed in three lower-extremity patients (six treatments) using interstitial temperature probes. The Jaccard coefficient quantified pretreatment motion; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed its predictability for acceptable precision (<1 °C) during HT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the built-in dual-echo approach, single-echo thermometry improved the mean temporal precision from 1.32 ± 0.40 °C to 1.07 ± 0.34 °C (pelvis) and from 0.99 ± 0.28 °C to 0.76 ± 0.23 °C (lower extremities). With body fat-based field drift correction, single-echo mean accuracy improved from 1.4 °C to 1.0 °C. Pretreatment bulk motion provided excellent precision prediction with an area under the curve of 0.80-0.86 (pelvis) and 0.81-0.83 (lower extremities), compared to gastrointestinal air motion (0.52-0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-echo MRT exhibited better precision than dual-echo MRT. Body fat-based field-drift correction significantly improved MRT accuracy. Pretreatment bulk motion showed improved prediction of acceptable MRT temporal precision over gastrointestinal air motion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hyperthermia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"2405105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hyperthermia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项研究评估了盆腔和下肢软组织肉瘤深部区域热疗(HT)期间磁共振温度测量(MRT)的性能。在磁共振扫描过程中,每隔 1.4 秒采集一对双回波梯度回波扫描。对于每对扫描,使用两个回波("双回波")或仅一个回波("单回波")的相位数据,在感兴趣场漂移校正区域内或排除体脂肪像素,对精确度进行量化。使用内置的临床软件工具(SigmaVision)将每种方法的精确度与 MRT 方法的精确度进行了比较。使用间质温度探针对三名下肢患者(六次治疗)进行了准确性评估。杰卡尔系数量化了治疗前的运动;接收器操作特征分析评估了其可接受精度的预测性(结果:与内置双回波方法相比,单回波测温法将平均时间精度从 1.32 ± 0.40 ℃ 提高到 1.07 ± 0.34 ℃(骨盆),从 0.99 ± 0.28 ℃ 提高到 0.76 ± 0.23 ℃(下肢)。通过基于体脂的场漂移校正,单次回波平均准确度从 1.4 ℃ 提高到 1.0 ℃。与胃肠道空气运动(0.52-0.58)相比,治疗前的体积运动提供了极好的精确预测,曲线下面积为 0.80-0.86(骨盆)和 0.81-0.83(下肢):结论:单回波磁共振成像比双回波磁共振成像的精确度更高。结论:单回波 MRT 比双回波 MRT 具有更高的精确度。基于体脂的场漂移校正显著提高了 MRT 的精确度。与胃肠道空气运动相比,治疗前体液运动能更好地预测可接受的 MRT 时间精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis.

Introduction: This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.

Materials and methods: 17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regional HT and chemotherapy. Pairs of double-echo gradient-echo scans were acquired during the MR protocol 1.4 s apart. For each pair, precision was quantified using phase data from both echoes ('dual-echo') or only one ('single-echo') in- or excluding body fat pixels in the field drift correction region of interest. The precision of each method was compared to that of the MRT approach using a built-in clinical software tool (SigmaVision). Accuracy was assessed in three lower-extremity patients (six treatments) using interstitial temperature probes. The Jaccard coefficient quantified pretreatment motion; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed its predictability for acceptable precision (<1 °C) during HT.

Results: Compared to the built-in dual-echo approach, single-echo thermometry improved the mean temporal precision from 1.32 ± 0.40 °C to 1.07 ± 0.34 °C (pelvis) and from 0.99 ± 0.28 °C to 0.76 ± 0.23 °C (lower extremities). With body fat-based field drift correction, single-echo mean accuracy improved from 1.4 °C to 1.0 °C. Pretreatment bulk motion provided excellent precision prediction with an area under the curve of 0.80-0.86 (pelvis) and 0.81-0.83 (lower extremities), compared to gastrointestinal air motion (0.52-0.58).

Conclusion: Single-echo MRT exhibited better precision than dual-echo MRT. Body fat-based field-drift correction significantly improved MRT accuracy. Pretreatment bulk motion showed improved prediction of acceptable MRT temporal precision over gastrointestinal air motion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hyperthermia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信