{"title":"肺结核相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的最佳呼气末正压水平。","authors":"Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian, Batoul Khoundabi, Ashkan Bahrami, Hamidreza Jamaati, Mohammad Varahram, Leila Saljoughi, Payam Rahimi, Reza Eshraghi","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective is to assess lung compliance and identify the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in patients with tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TB-ARDS) compared to non-TB-ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational case-control study utilized electrical impedance tomography to evaluate lung mechanics in 20 TB-ARDS and 20 non-TB-ARDS patients. Participants underwent PEEP titration from 23 to 5 cm H2O in 2 cm H2O decrements. Lung compliance and the rates of hyperdistention and collapse were assessed at each PEEP level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delta impedance values showed higher amounts in a PEEP range of 11-17 cm H2O and in patients with TB-ARDS (P > 0.05). In addition, both hyperdistention and collapse rates were nonsignificantly higher in TB-ARDS patients (P > 0.05), and the compromised levels of hyperdistention and collapse rates were at 15-17 cm H2O, indicating the most favorable PEEP level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed patterns of hyperdistention and collapse rates across various PEEP levels provide valuable insights into the susceptibility of TB-ARDS patients to barotrauma. Notably, the identified optimal PEEP range between 15 and 17 cm H2O may guide ventilator management strategies in mitigating both hyperdistention and collapse; nonetheless, due to the high variability of lung compliances within groups, we strongly recommend individualized consideration for tailored respiratory support and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":"13 3","pages":"247-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Levels in Tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian, Batoul Khoundabi, Ashkan Bahrami, Hamidreza Jamaati, Mohammad Varahram, Leila Saljoughi, Payam Rahimi, Reza Eshraghi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective is to assess lung compliance and identify the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in patients with tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TB-ARDS) compared to non-TB-ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational case-control study utilized electrical impedance tomography to evaluate lung mechanics in 20 TB-ARDS and 20 non-TB-ARDS patients. Participants underwent PEEP titration from 23 to 5 cm H2O in 2 cm H2O decrements. Lung compliance and the rates of hyperdistention and collapse were assessed at each PEEP level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delta impedance values showed higher amounts in a PEEP range of 11-17 cm H2O and in patients with TB-ARDS (P > 0.05). In addition, both hyperdistention and collapse rates were nonsignificantly higher in TB-ARDS patients (P > 0.05), and the compromised levels of hyperdistention and collapse rates were at 15-17 cm H2O, indicating the most favorable PEEP level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed patterns of hyperdistention and collapse rates across various PEEP levels provide valuable insights into the susceptibility of TB-ARDS patients to barotrauma. Notably, the identified optimal PEEP range between 15 and 17 cm H2O may guide ventilator management strategies in mitigating both hyperdistention and collapse; nonetheless, due to the high variability of lung compliances within groups, we strongly recommend individualized consideration for tailored respiratory support and evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mycobacteriology\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"247-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mycobacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目的是评估肺顺应性,并确定肺结核相关性急性呼吸窘迫综合征(TB-ARDS)患者与非 TB-ARDS 患者相比的最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)水平:这项观察性病例对照研究利用电阻抗断层扫描评估了 20 名肺结核相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者和 20 名非肺结核相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肺力学状况。参与者的 PEEP 值从 23 厘米 H2O 到 5 厘米 H2O,以 2 厘米 H2O 为单位递减。评估了每个 PEEP 水平下的肺顺应性、过度滞留率和塌陷率:结果:Delta 阻抗值在 PEEP 11-17 cm H2O 范围内和 TB-ARDS 患者中显示较高(P > 0.05)。此外,TB-ARDS 患者的超滞留率和塌陷率均无显著性差异(P > 0.05),超滞留率和塌陷率的最低水平为 15-17 cm H2O,这表明 PEEP 水平是最有利的:结论:在不同 PEEP 水平下观察到的过度滞留和塌陷率模式为了解肺结核-ARDS 患者对气压创伤的易感性提供了有价值的见解。值得注意的是,在 15 到 17 cm H2O 之间确定的最佳 PEEP 范围可指导呼吸机管理策略,以减轻过度滞留和塌陷;然而,由于组内肺顺应性的高度变异性,我们强烈建议个体化考虑定制呼吸支持和评估。
Background: The objective is to assess lung compliance and identify the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in patients with tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TB-ARDS) compared to non-TB-ARDS patients.
Methods: This observational case-control study utilized electrical impedance tomography to evaluate lung mechanics in 20 TB-ARDS and 20 non-TB-ARDS patients. Participants underwent PEEP titration from 23 to 5 cm H2O in 2 cm H2O decrements. Lung compliance and the rates of hyperdistention and collapse were assessed at each PEEP level.
Results: Delta impedance values showed higher amounts in a PEEP range of 11-17 cm H2O and in patients with TB-ARDS (P > 0.05). In addition, both hyperdistention and collapse rates were nonsignificantly higher in TB-ARDS patients (P > 0.05), and the compromised levels of hyperdistention and collapse rates were at 15-17 cm H2O, indicating the most favorable PEEP level.
Conclusions: The observed patterns of hyperdistention and collapse rates across various PEEP levels provide valuable insights into the susceptibility of TB-ARDS patients to barotrauma. Notably, the identified optimal PEEP range between 15 and 17 cm H2O may guide ventilator management strategies in mitigating both hyperdistention and collapse; nonetheless, due to the high variability of lung compliances within groups, we strongly recommend individualized consideration for tailored respiratory support and evaluation.