灭活结核分枝杆菌的方法:文献系统综述。

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
International Journal of Mycobacteriology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_49_24
Aiko N Vigo, Zully M Puyén, David Santos-Lázaro, Mary L Perea, Lely Solari
{"title":"灭活结核分枝杆菌的方法:文献系统综述。","authors":"Aiko N Vigo, Zully M Puyén, David Santos-Lázaro, Mary L Perea, Lely Solari","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_49_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To systematize published laboratory methods to inactivate Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and to describe their effectiveness. We carried out a review of the scientific literature to identify the publications that reported methods for the inactivation of MTB, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The search addressed inactivation methodologies used in Public health laboratories for the treatment of biological material and only included studies reporting the efficacy of the method. The database used were PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences). We evaluated the quality of the studies with the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Instrument Appraisal Checklist. We included 14 publications meeting the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. These 14 studies actually described a total of 35 inactivation methods. Most of them combined heat treatment with some chemical or enzymatic agent, and there were very few applying a single strategy. Twenty-four (68.57%) methods demonstrated significant efficacy in inactivating MTB. The systematic review identified 35 methods of inactivation of MTB, published in 14 studies. Most of the methods combined physical treatment techniques, especially heat, with chemical and/or enzymatic treatment techniques, obtaining mostly good results in preventing the reproduction of the microorganism. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews) (Code CRD42024503621).</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for the Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Aiko N Vigo, Zully M Puyén, David Santos-Lázaro, Mary L Perea, Lely Solari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_49_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To systematize published laboratory methods to inactivate Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and to describe their effectiveness. We carried out a review of the scientific literature to identify the publications that reported methods for the inactivation of MTB, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The search addressed inactivation methodologies used in Public health laboratories for the treatment of biological material and only included studies reporting the efficacy of the method. The database used were PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences). We evaluated the quality of the studies with the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Instrument Appraisal Checklist. We included 14 publications meeting the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. These 14 studies actually described a total of 35 inactivation methods. Most of them combined heat treatment with some chemical or enzymatic agent, and there were very few applying a single strategy. Twenty-four (68.57%) methods demonstrated significant efficacy in inactivating MTB. The systematic review identified 35 methods of inactivation of MTB, published in 14 studies. Most of the methods combined physical treatment techniques, especially heat, with chemical and/or enzymatic treatment techniques, obtaining mostly good results in preventing the reproduction of the microorganism. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews) (Code CRD42024503621).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mycobacteriology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mycobacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_49_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_49_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统整理已发表的实验室灭活结核分枝杆菌(MTB)的方法,并描述其有效性。我们根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》的建议,对科学文献进行了综述,以确定报道 MTB 灭活方法的出版物。检索涉及公共卫生实验室用于处理生物材料的灭活方法,并且只包括报告该方法有效性的研究。使用的数据库是 PubMed(美国国家医学图书馆)和 LILACS(拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康科学文献)。我们使用 JBI(乔安娜-布里格斯研究所)关键工具评估清单对研究质量进行了评估。我们纳入了 14 篇符合既定纳入和排除标准的出版物。这 14 项研究实际共描述了 35 种灭活方法。其中大多数研究将热处理与某些化学或酶制剂结合起来,只有极少数研究采用了单一策略。有 24 种(68.57%)方法在灭活 MTB 方面有显著效果。系统综述确定了 14 项研究中发表的 35 种 MTB 灭活方法。大多数方法将物理处理技术(尤其是加热)与化学和/或酶处理技术相结合,在防止微生物繁殖方面取得了良好的效果。PROSPERO(正在进行的系统综述国际前瞻性注册)(代码 CRD42024503621)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for the Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

To systematize published laboratory methods to inactivate Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and to describe their effectiveness. We carried out a review of the scientific literature to identify the publications that reported methods for the inactivation of MTB, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The search addressed inactivation methodologies used in Public health laboratories for the treatment of biological material and only included studies reporting the efficacy of the method. The database used were PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences). We evaluated the quality of the studies with the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Instrument Appraisal Checklist. We included 14 publications meeting the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. These 14 studies actually described a total of 35 inactivation methods. Most of them combined heat treatment with some chemical or enzymatic agent, and there were very few applying a single strategy. Twenty-four (68.57%) methods demonstrated significant efficacy in inactivating MTB. The systematic review identified 35 methods of inactivation of MTB, published in 14 studies. Most of the methods combined physical treatment techniques, especially heat, with chemical and/or enzymatic treatment techniques, obtaining mostly good results in preventing the reproduction of the microorganism. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews) (Code CRD42024503621).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信