丝裂霉素 C 的安全性和有效性增强型小梁切除术:腱膜下注射与海绵应用的对比。

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kanan Vimal Sedani, Purvi Raj Bhagat, Abhishek Suryakant Chauhan
{"title":"丝裂霉素 C 的安全性和有效性增强型小梁切除术:腱膜下注射与海绵应用的对比。","authors":"Kanan Vimal Sedani, Purvi Raj Bhagat, Abhishek Suryakant Chauhan","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_154_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to study the safety and efficacy of subtenon injection of mitomycin C (MMC) versus sponge application of MMC during trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients having primary glaucoma warranting trabeculectomy were enrolled in the study and their forty eyes were alternately allocated into either of the two groups: subtenon injection (ST) of 0.1 mL of 0.01% of MMC or sponge application (SP) of 0.02% of MMC and were operated by a single surgeon and followed for 3 months. The outcome was analyzed primarily based on reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) and bleb morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar outcome in terms of complete success (ST - 90% and SP - 85%), qualified success (ST - 5% and SP - 5%), and failure rate (ST - 5% and SP - 10%) was seen at the end of 3 months. The absolute reduction in IOP from the baseline was -10.00 ± 3.67 mmHg (-41.2% ± 12.30) in ST versus -8.90 ± 5.56 mmHg (-35.9% ± 16.1) in the SP group at the end of 3 months. At the end of 3 months, blebs in the ST group had low-to-medium height and in the SP group had low height. Blebs in both the groups were diffuse with mild vascularity. Antiglaucoma medications required postoperatively were 0.20 ± 0.62 versus 0.40 ± 1.10 in the ST and SP group, respectively. The duration of surgery was 19.85 ± 0.75 min in the ST group versus 22.50 ± 0.51 min in the SP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subtenon injection of MMC is as efficacious and safe as the conventional sponge application technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Mitomycin C: Augmented Trabeculectomy: Subtenon's Injection versus Sponge Application.\",\"authors\":\"Kanan Vimal Sedani, Purvi Raj Bhagat, Abhishek Suryakant Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_154_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to study the safety and efficacy of subtenon injection of mitomycin C (MMC) versus sponge application of MMC during trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients having primary glaucoma warranting trabeculectomy were enrolled in the study and their forty eyes were alternately allocated into either of the two groups: subtenon injection (ST) of 0.1 mL of 0.01% of MMC or sponge application (SP) of 0.02% of MMC and were operated by a single surgeon and followed for 3 months. The outcome was analyzed primarily based on reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) and bleb morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar outcome in terms of complete success (ST - 90% and SP - 85%), qualified success (ST - 5% and SP - 5%), and failure rate (ST - 5% and SP - 10%) was seen at the end of 3 months. The absolute reduction in IOP from the baseline was -10.00 ± 3.67 mmHg (-41.2% ± 12.30) in ST versus -8.90 ± 5.56 mmHg (-35.9% ± 16.1) in the SP group at the end of 3 months. At the end of 3 months, blebs in the ST group had low-to-medium height and in the SP group had low height. Blebs in both the groups were diffuse with mild vascularity. Antiglaucoma medications required postoperatively were 0.20 ± 0.62 versus 0.40 ± 1.10 in the ST and SP group, respectively. The duration of surgery was 19.85 ± 0.75 min in the ST group versus 22.50 ± 0.51 min in the SP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subtenon injection of MMC is as efficacious and safe as the conventional sponge application technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"156-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412556/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_154_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_154_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究旨在探讨小梁切除术中腱鞘下注射丝裂霉素 C(MMC)与海绵涂抹 MMC 的安全性和有效性:37名需要进行小梁切除术的原发性青光眼患者被纳入研究,他们的40只眼睛被交替分配到两组中的任何一组:腱膜下注射(ST)0.1毫升0.01%的丝裂霉素C(MMC)或海绵涂抹(SP)0.02%的丝裂霉素C(MMC),由一名外科医生进行手术并随访3个月。结果主要根据眼压(IOP)的降低情况和眼泡形态进行分析:结果:3个月后,完全成功率(ST-90%,SP-85%)、合格成功率(ST-5%,SP-5%)和失败率(ST-5%,SP-10%)相似。3 个月后,ST 组的眼压绝对值比基线降低了 -10.00 ± 3.67 mmHg (-41.2% ± 12.30),而 SP 组为 -8.90 ± 5.56 mmHg (-35.9% ± 16.1)。3 个月后,ST 组出血点高度为中低,而 SP 组出血点高度较低。两组患者的出血点均呈弥漫性,伴有轻度血管扩张。ST 组和 SP 组术后所需的抗青光眼药物分别为 0.20 ± 0.62 和 0.40 ± 1.10。ST 组的手术时间为 19.85 ± 0.75 分钟,而 SP 组为 22.50 ± 0.51 分钟:结论:腱膜下注射 MMC 与传统的海绵应用技术一样有效、安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of Mitomycin C: Augmented Trabeculectomy: Subtenon's Injection versus Sponge Application.

Objective: The objective of the study was to study the safety and efficacy of subtenon injection of mitomycin C (MMC) versus sponge application of MMC during trabeculectomy.

Materials and methods: Thirty-seven patients having primary glaucoma warranting trabeculectomy were enrolled in the study and their forty eyes were alternately allocated into either of the two groups: subtenon injection (ST) of 0.1 mL of 0.01% of MMC or sponge application (SP) of 0.02% of MMC and were operated by a single surgeon and followed for 3 months. The outcome was analyzed primarily based on reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) and bleb morphology.

Results: Similar outcome in terms of complete success (ST - 90% and SP - 85%), qualified success (ST - 5% and SP - 5%), and failure rate (ST - 5% and SP - 10%) was seen at the end of 3 months. The absolute reduction in IOP from the baseline was -10.00 ± 3.67 mmHg (-41.2% ± 12.30) in ST versus -8.90 ± 5.56 mmHg (-35.9% ± 16.1) in the SP group at the end of 3 months. At the end of 3 months, blebs in the ST group had low-to-medium height and in the SP group had low height. Blebs in both the groups were diffuse with mild vascularity. Antiglaucoma medications required postoperatively were 0.20 ± 0.62 versus 0.40 ± 1.10 in the ST and SP group, respectively. The duration of surgery was 19.85 ± 0.75 min in the ST group versus 22.50 ± 0.51 min in the SP group.

Conclusion: Subtenon injection of MMC is as efficacious and safe as the conventional sponge application technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信