热阈值测试诊断 2 型糖尿病神经病变敏感性的试验间差异。

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Archana Gaur, Sakthivadivel Varatharajan, Madhuri Taranikanti, Nitin Ashok John, Medala Kalpana, Vidya Ganji, Madhusudhan Umesh, Roja Katta
{"title":"热阈值测试诊断 2 型糖尿病神经病变敏感性的试验间差异。","authors":"Archana Gaur, Sakthivadivel Varatharajan, Madhuri Taranikanti, Nitin Ashok John, Medala Kalpana, Vidya Ganji, Madhusudhan Umesh, Roja Katta","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_207_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal threshold testing (TTT) is a simple non-invasive approach for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy earlier. Conventionally the TTT is done in all four limbs and at least 6 trials are done to obtain the mean threshold, which is time consuming.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We propose to assess the validity and reliability of reduced number of trials of TTT in the lower limbs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After obtaining ethics approval from the Institute Ethics Committee, 100 patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of both gender between the ages of 35 to 65 years attending medicine OPD were recruited. Neuropathy assessment was done using Temperature threshold testing. At least 6 trials were performed for each site and the mean threshold obtained. The mean of 5 trials, 4 trials and 3 trials were noted for the comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On comparing hot tests of 3 trials with 6 trials had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.7% and 96.6 %. In cold threshold testing, 4 trials and 3 trials showed similar results of sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 98.8%. The measures of agreement between the hot trials 6 vs 5 had Kappa value of 0.953, 6vs 4 showed a Kappa value of 0.862 and 6 vs 3 showed Kappa value of 0.819.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hot threshold tests of lower limb are more sensitive than cold thresholds. The 4 trial test is a reliable test and can be performed over 6 trial tests. When time is a factor, three trials are sufficient to diagnose small fibre neuropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"182-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-trial Variation in the Sensitivity of Thermal Threshold Testing for the Diagnosis of Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Archana Gaur, Sakthivadivel Varatharajan, Madhuri Taranikanti, Nitin Ashok John, Medala Kalpana, Vidya Ganji, Madhusudhan Umesh, Roja Katta\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_207_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal threshold testing (TTT) is a simple non-invasive approach for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy earlier. Conventionally the TTT is done in all four limbs and at least 6 trials are done to obtain the mean threshold, which is time consuming.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We propose to assess the validity and reliability of reduced number of trials of TTT in the lower limbs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After obtaining ethics approval from the Institute Ethics Committee, 100 patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of both gender between the ages of 35 to 65 years attending medicine OPD were recruited. Neuropathy assessment was done using Temperature threshold testing. At least 6 trials were performed for each site and the mean threshold obtained. The mean of 5 trials, 4 trials and 3 trials were noted for the comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On comparing hot tests of 3 trials with 6 trials had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.7% and 96.6 %. In cold threshold testing, 4 trials and 3 trials showed similar results of sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 98.8%. The measures of agreement between the hot trials 6 vs 5 had Kappa value of 0.953, 6vs 4 showed a Kappa value of 0.862 and 6 vs 3 showed Kappa value of 0.819.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hot threshold tests of lower limb are more sensitive than cold thresholds. The 4 trial test is a reliable test and can be performed over 6 trial tests. When time is a factor, three trials are sufficient to diagnose small fibre neuropathy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"182-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_207_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_207_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:热阈值测试(TTT)是一种早期诊断糖尿病神经病变的简单无创方法。目的:我们建议评估减少下肢热阈测试次数的有效性和可靠性:在获得研究所伦理委员会的伦理批准后,招募了 100 名年龄在 35 岁至 65 岁之间、在内科门诊就诊的 2 型糖尿病患者。神经病变评估采用温度阈值测试法进行。每个部位至少进行 6 次试验,并得出平均阈值。比较结果分别为 5 次、4 次和 3 次试验的平均值:结果:在热试验中,3 次试验和 6 次试验的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.7% 和 96.6%。在冷阈值测试中,4 次试验和 3 次试验的结果相似,敏感性为 77.8%,特异性为 98.8%。热试验 6 对 5 的 Kappa 值为 0.953,6 对 4 的 Kappa 值为 0.862,6 对 3 的 Kappa 值为 0.819:结论:下肢热阈值测试比冷阈值测试更敏感。结论:下肢热阈值测试比冷阈值测试更灵敏。当时间因素影响时,3 次试验足以诊断小纤维神经病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-trial Variation in the Sensitivity of Thermal Threshold Testing for the Diagnosis of Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: Thermal threshold testing (TTT) is a simple non-invasive approach for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy earlier. Conventionally the TTT is done in all four limbs and at least 6 trials are done to obtain the mean threshold, which is time consuming.

Aim: We propose to assess the validity and reliability of reduced number of trials of TTT in the lower limbs.

Materials and methods: After obtaining ethics approval from the Institute Ethics Committee, 100 patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of both gender between the ages of 35 to 65 years attending medicine OPD were recruited. Neuropathy assessment was done using Temperature threshold testing. At least 6 trials were performed for each site and the mean threshold obtained. The mean of 5 trials, 4 trials and 3 trials were noted for the comparison.

Results: On comparing hot tests of 3 trials with 6 trials had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.7% and 96.6 %. In cold threshold testing, 4 trials and 3 trials showed similar results of sensitivity of 77.8%, specificity of 98.8%. The measures of agreement between the hot trials 6 vs 5 had Kappa value of 0.953, 6vs 4 showed a Kappa value of 0.862 and 6 vs 3 showed Kappa value of 0.819.

Conclusion: Hot threshold tests of lower limb are more sensitive than cold thresholds. The 4 trial test is a reliable test and can be performed over 6 trial tests. When time is a factor, three trials are sufficient to diagnose small fibre neuropathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信