Fabian Linden, Thomas Mihu, Norbert Frey, Christian Erbel
{"title":"使用凤凰穿刺器成功治疗慢性静脉支架内再狭窄。","authors":"Fabian Linden, Thomas Mihu, Norbert Frey, Christian Erbel","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05229-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although endovascular treatment of venous obstruction with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting is a safe and effective alternative to conservative treatment, the overall prevalence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains high in this patient population. This study reports a novel treatment option for patients with chronic ISR (C-ISR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our center, all patients with ISR were treated based on the time since the initial intervention. Acute in-stent restenosis (A-ISR) was preferably treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis or a pharmacomechanical peripheral thrombectomy device and PTA. Selected patients with chronic ISR (C-ISR) (greater than 30 days) were treated with a catheter- guided unidirectional atherectomy in addition to PTA, under the assumption of a non-thrombotic mechanism in the development of C-ISR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate a safe and practical treatment option for chronic ISR using a catheter- guided technical approach with the Phoenix atherectomy device in four patients. Technical success was achieved in every case, and mid-term patency was restored in three out of four patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restenosis following venous stenting is highly complex. Patients must be treated individually, with a focus on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy regimens, as well as the appropriate interventional treatment. Catheter- guided atherectomy is a viable option for this heterogeneous group of patients. Further studies are required to understand the etiology of chronic ISR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful treatment of chronic venous in-stent restenosis using a Phoenix atherectomy device.\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Linden, Thomas Mihu, Norbert Frey, Christian Erbel\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05229-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although endovascular treatment of venous obstruction with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting is a safe and effective alternative to conservative treatment, the overall prevalence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains high in this patient population. This study reports a novel treatment option for patients with chronic ISR (C-ISR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our center, all patients with ISR were treated based on the time since the initial intervention. Acute in-stent restenosis (A-ISR) was preferably treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis or a pharmacomechanical peripheral thrombectomy device and PTA. Selected patients with chronic ISR (C-ISR) (greater than 30 days) were treated with a catheter- guided unidirectional atherectomy in addition to PTA, under the assumption of a non-thrombotic mechanism in the development of C-ISR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate a safe and practical treatment option for chronic ISR using a catheter- guided technical approach with the Phoenix atherectomy device in four patients. Technical success was achieved in every case, and mid-term patency was restored in three out of four patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restenosis following venous stenting is highly complex. Patients must be treated individually, with a focus on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy regimens, as well as the appropriate interventional treatment. Catheter- guided atherectomy is a viable option for this heterogeneous group of patients. Further studies are required to understand the etiology of chronic ISR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05229-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05229-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Successful treatment of chronic venous in-stent restenosis using a Phoenix atherectomy device.
Background: Although endovascular treatment of venous obstruction with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting is a safe and effective alternative to conservative treatment, the overall prevalence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains high in this patient population. This study reports a novel treatment option for patients with chronic ISR (C-ISR).
Methods: At our center, all patients with ISR were treated based on the time since the initial intervention. Acute in-stent restenosis (A-ISR) was preferably treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis or a pharmacomechanical peripheral thrombectomy device and PTA. Selected patients with chronic ISR (C-ISR) (greater than 30 days) were treated with a catheter- guided unidirectional atherectomy in addition to PTA, under the assumption of a non-thrombotic mechanism in the development of C-ISR.
Results: We demonstrate a safe and practical treatment option for chronic ISR using a catheter- guided technical approach with the Phoenix atherectomy device in four patients. Technical success was achieved in every case, and mid-term patency was restored in three out of four patients.
Conclusions: Restenosis following venous stenting is highly complex. Patients must be treated individually, with a focus on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy regimens, as well as the appropriate interventional treatment. Catheter- guided atherectomy is a viable option for this heterogeneous group of patients. Further studies are required to understand the etiology of chronic ISR.
期刊介绍:
International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).