Sania Jiwani MBBS , Wan-Chi Chan MBBS , Akshaya Gadre MBBS , Seth Sheldon MD, FHRS , Jinxiang Hu PhD , Rhea Pimentel MD, FHRS , Amit Noheria MBBS, SM , Kamal Gupta MBBS
{"title":"终末期肾病患者心血管植入式电子设备感染的发生率和结果。","authors":"Sania Jiwani MBBS , Wan-Chi Chan MBBS , Akshaya Gadre MBBS , Seth Sheldon MD, FHRS , Jinxiang Hu PhD , Rhea Pimentel MD, FHRS , Amit Noheria MBBS, SM , Kamal Gupta MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are prone to bloodstream infections that may result in a higher risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, risk predictors, management strategies, and long-term outcomes of CIED infections in ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective study using the United States Renal Data System. ESKD patients with de novo CIED implantation between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2014, were included. Patients were observed until death, kidney transplantation, end of Medicare coverage, or September 30, 2015, to assess incidence of CIED infection. Management approach was determined from procedure codes for lead extraction within 60 days of CIED infection diagnosis. Patients with CIED infection were observed until December 31, 2019, to assess long-term outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 15,515 ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation, incidence of CIED infection was 4.8% during a median follow-up of 1.3 years. The presence of a defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.48), higher body mass index (aHR, 1.01), and younger age (aHR, 0.96) were independent risk factors for CIED infection. Lead extraction occurred in only 50.71% of patients by 60 days. After propensity score matching, the 3-year mortality was higher in those who did not undergo lead extraction compared with those who did (80.3% vs 72.3%) and time to mortality was shorter (0.3 vs 0.6 year). Only 13.8% of patients underwent reimplantation with a new CIED after lead extraction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CIED infections occur frequently in ESKD patients and are associated with a high mortality. Early lead extraction is not performed routinely but is associated with improved survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 744-751"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and outcomes of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in patients with end-stage kidney disease\",\"authors\":\"Sania Jiwani MBBS , Wan-Chi Chan MBBS , Akshaya Gadre MBBS , Seth Sheldon MD, FHRS , Jinxiang Hu PhD , Rhea Pimentel MD, FHRS , Amit Noheria MBBS, SM , Kamal Gupta MBBS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are prone to bloodstream infections that may result in a higher risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, risk predictors, management strategies, and long-term outcomes of CIED infections in ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective study using the United States Renal Data System. ESKD patients with de novo CIED implantation between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2014, were included. Patients were observed until death, kidney transplantation, end of Medicare coverage, or September 30, 2015, to assess incidence of CIED infection. Management approach was determined from procedure codes for lead extraction within 60 days of CIED infection diagnosis. Patients with CIED infection were observed until December 31, 2019, to assess long-term outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 15,515 ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation, incidence of CIED infection was 4.8% during a median follow-up of 1.3 years. The presence of a defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.48), higher body mass index (aHR, 1.01), and younger age (aHR, 0.96) were independent risk factors for CIED infection. Lead extraction occurred in only 50.71% of patients by 60 days. After propensity score matching, the 3-year mortality was higher in those who did not undergo lead extraction compared with those who did (80.3% vs 72.3%) and time to mortality was shorter (0.3 vs 0.6 year). Only 13.8% of patients underwent reimplantation with a new CIED after lead extraction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CIED infections occur frequently in ESKD patients and are associated with a high mortality. Early lead extraction is not performed routinely but is associated with improved survival.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 744-751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124033137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124033137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidence and outcomes of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in patients with end-stage kidney disease
Background
End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are prone to bloodstream infections that may result in a higher risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.
Objective
The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, risk predictors, management strategies, and long-term outcomes of CIED infections in ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation.
Methods
This is a retrospective study using the United States Renal Data System. ESKD patients with de novo CIED implantation between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2014, were included. Patients were observed until death, kidney transplantation, end of Medicare coverage, or September 30, 2015, to assess incidence of CIED infection. Management approach was determined from procedure codes for lead extraction within 60 days of CIED infection diagnosis. Patients with CIED infection were observed until December 31, 2019, to assess long-term outcomes.
Results
Of 15,515 ESKD patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation, incidence of CIED infection was 4.8% during a median follow-up of 1.3 years. The presence of a defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.48), higher body mass index (aHR, 1.01), and younger age (aHR, 0.96) were independent risk factors for CIED infection. Lead extraction occurred in only 50.71% of patients by 60 days. After propensity score matching, the 3-year mortality was higher in those who did not undergo lead extraction compared with those who did (80.3% vs 72.3%) and time to mortality was shorter (0.3 vs 0.6 year). Only 13.8% of patients underwent reimplantation with a new CIED after lead extraction.
Conclusion
CIED infections occur frequently in ESKD patients and are associated with a high mortality. Early lead extraction is not performed routinely but is associated with improved survival.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.