{"title":"水下内镜粘膜切除术治疗 10-20 毫米结直肠锯齿状病变的安全性和有效性(SEA CLEAR 研究)。","authors":"Kosuke Tanaka MD , Yohei Yabuuchi MD , Kenichiro Imai MD, FJGES , Kazuya Hosotani MD , Shuko Morita MD , Kazunori Takada MD , Yoshihiro Kishida MD, PhD, FJGES , Sayo Ito MD , Kinichi Hotta MD, FJGES , Keita Mori PhD , Tetsuro Inokuma MD, PhD , Hiroyuki Ono MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Colorectal serrated lesions (SLs) are precursors of colorectal carcinoma via the serrated neoplasia pathway. However, the success rate of endoscopic resection of large SLs is low. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of underwater EMR (UEMR) for SLs sized 10 to 20 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This 2-center, prospective, observational study included patients with at least 1 SL sized 10 to 20 mm. We resected the SLs by UEMR and performed tattooing at the resection site. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed 12 months postoperatively to evaluate local recurrence. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate of UEMR, which was defined as en bloc resection with no serrated tissue in the 4 marginal biopsy samples and histologically negative margins.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>UEMR was performed for 65 SLs in 58 patients, with a median lesion size of 14 mm. The en bloc, R0 resection, and complete resection rates were 87.7% (57 of 65), 61.5% (40 of 65), and 60.0% (39 of 65), respectively. Adverse events included 1 (1.5%) immediate bleeding and 1 (1.5%) delayed perforation. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 50 patients with 57 scars, and the rates of identification for tattoos and scars were 94.7% (54 of 57) and 100% (57 of 57), respectively. The recurrence rate was 5.3% (3 of 57), and all 3 recurrent lesions were completely resected endoscopically.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This 2-center prospective study demonstrated that UEMR for SLs sized 10 to 20 mm was comparable to previous conventional EMR outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 632-638"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of underwater EMR for 10- to 20-mm colorectal serrated lesions (SEA CLEAR study)\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Tanaka MD , Yohei Yabuuchi MD , Kenichiro Imai MD, FJGES , Kazuya Hosotani MD , Shuko Morita MD , Kazunori Takada MD , Yoshihiro Kishida MD, PhD, FJGES , Sayo Ito MD , Kinichi Hotta MD, FJGES , Keita Mori PhD , Tetsuro Inokuma MD, PhD , Hiroyuki Ono MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Colorectal serrated lesions (SLs) are precursors of colorectal carcinoma via the serrated neoplasia pathway. However, the success rate of endoscopic resection of large SLs is low. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of underwater EMR (UEMR) for SLs sized 10 to 20 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This 2-center, prospective, observational study included patients with at least 1 SL sized 10 to 20 mm. We resected the SLs by UEMR and performed tattooing at the resection site. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed 12 months postoperatively to evaluate local recurrence. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate of UEMR, which was defined as en bloc resection with no serrated tissue in the 4 marginal biopsy samples and histologically negative margins.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>UEMR was performed for 65 SLs in 58 patients, with a median lesion size of 14 mm. The en bloc, R0 resection, and complete resection rates were 87.7% (57 of 65), 61.5% (40 of 65), and 60.0% (39 of 65), respectively. Adverse events included 1 (1.5%) immediate bleeding and 1 (1.5%) delayed perforation. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 50 patients with 57 scars, and the rates of identification for tattoos and scars were 94.7% (54 of 57) and 100% (57 of 57), respectively. The recurrence rate was 5.3% (3 of 57), and all 3 recurrent lesions were completely resected endoscopically.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This 2-center prospective study demonstrated that UEMR for SLs sized 10 to 20 mm was comparable to previous conventional EMR outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"101 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 632-638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724034783\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724034783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety and efficacy of underwater EMR for 10- to 20-mm colorectal serrated lesions (SEA CLEAR study)
Background and Aims
Colorectal serrated lesions (SLs) are precursors of colorectal carcinoma via the serrated neoplasia pathway. However, the success rate of endoscopic resection of large SLs is low. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of underwater EMR (UEMR) for SLs sized 10 to 20 mm.
Methods
This 2-center, prospective, observational study included patients with at least 1 SL sized 10 to 20 mm. We resected the SLs by UEMR and performed tattooing at the resection site. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed 12 months postoperatively to evaluate local recurrence. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate of UEMR, which was defined as en bloc resection with no serrated tissue in the 4 marginal biopsy samples and histologically negative margins.
Results
UEMR was performed for 65 SLs in 58 patients, with a median lesion size of 14 mm. The en bloc, R0 resection, and complete resection rates were 87.7% (57 of 65), 61.5% (40 of 65), and 60.0% (39 of 65), respectively. Adverse events included 1 (1.5%) immediate bleeding and 1 (1.5%) delayed perforation. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 50 patients with 57 scars, and the rates of identification for tattoos and scars were 94.7% (54 of 57) and 100% (57 of 57), respectively. The recurrence rate was 5.3% (3 of 57), and all 3 recurrent lesions were completely resected endoscopically.
Conclusions
This 2-center prospective study demonstrated that UEMR for SLs sized 10 to 20 mm was comparable to previous conventional EMR outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.