学术自我效能对在线学习成果的影响:最新文献综述。

IF 3.8 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
EXCLI Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17179/excli2024-7502
Satoru Yokoyama
{"title":"学术自我效能对在线学习成果的影响:最新文献综述。","authors":"Satoru Yokoyama","doi":"10.17179/excli2024-7502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the concept of self-efficacy has garnered attention in educational psychology research on motivation. Within an academic context, academic self-efficacy (ASE) reflects learners' belief in their ability to achieve educational goals. However, most research has focused on traditional face-to-face classroom settings, with little exploration in distance learning environments like online and e-learning. The current review aims to update a previous study (Yokoyama, 2019[40]) and examine differences in online learning types: asynchronous, synchronous, and blended learning. The study's findings reveal that in mixed environments combining synchronous and asynchronous elements, or in blended settings merging face-to-face classes with asynchronous learning, ASE positively impacts academic performance akin to traditional face-to-face classes. However, in asynchronous online learning environments, ASE's influence on academic performance might be slightly weaker compared to synchronous learning environments. The paper will subsequently discuss the pedagogical implications derived from these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12247,"journal":{"name":"EXCLI Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of academic self-efficacy on online learning outcomes: a recent literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Satoru Yokoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.17179/excli2024-7502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, the concept of self-efficacy has garnered attention in educational psychology research on motivation. Within an academic context, academic self-efficacy (ASE) reflects learners' belief in their ability to achieve educational goals. However, most research has focused on traditional face-to-face classroom settings, with little exploration in distance learning environments like online and e-learning. The current review aims to update a previous study (Yokoyama, 2019[40]) and examine differences in online learning types: asynchronous, synchronous, and blended learning. The study's findings reveal that in mixed environments combining synchronous and asynchronous elements, or in blended settings merging face-to-face classes with asynchronous learning, ASE positively impacts academic performance akin to traditional face-to-face classes. However, in asynchronous online learning environments, ASE's influence on academic performance might be slightly weaker compared to synchronous learning environments. The paper will subsequently discuss the pedagogical implications derived from these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXCLI Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXCLI Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-7502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXCLI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-7502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,自我效能感这一概念在有关动机的教育心理学研究中备受关注。在学术背景下,学术自我效能感(ASE)反映了学习者对自己实现教育目标的能力的信念。然而,大多数研究都集中在传统的面对面课堂教学环境中,对在线学习和电子学习等远程学习环境的研究却很少。本综述旨在更新之前的一项研究(Yokoyama,2019[40]),并考察在线学习类型的差异:异步学习、同步学习和混合学习。研究结果表明,在结合了同步和异步元素的混合环境中,或在融合了面授课程和异步学习的混合环境中,ASE对学习成绩的积极影响与传统面授课程类似。然而,在异步在线学习环境中,与同步学习环境相比,ASE 对学习成绩的影响可能会稍弱一些。本文随后将讨论这些结果对教学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of academic self-efficacy on online learning outcomes: a recent literature review.

In recent years, the concept of self-efficacy has garnered attention in educational psychology research on motivation. Within an academic context, academic self-efficacy (ASE) reflects learners' belief in their ability to achieve educational goals. However, most research has focused on traditional face-to-face classroom settings, with little exploration in distance learning environments like online and e-learning. The current review aims to update a previous study (Yokoyama, 2019[40]) and examine differences in online learning types: asynchronous, synchronous, and blended learning. The study's findings reveal that in mixed environments combining synchronous and asynchronous elements, or in blended settings merging face-to-face classes with asynchronous learning, ASE positively impacts academic performance akin to traditional face-to-face classes. However, in asynchronous online learning environments, ASE's influence on academic performance might be slightly weaker compared to synchronous learning environments. The paper will subsequently discuss the pedagogical implications derived from these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXCLI Journal
EXCLI Journal BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: EXCLI Journal publishes original research reports, authoritative reviews and case reports of experimental and clinical sciences. The journal is particularly keen to keep a broad view of science and technology, and therefore welcomes papers which bridge disciplines and may not suit the narrow specialism of other journals. Although the general emphasis is on biological sciences, studies from the following fields are explicitly encouraged (alphabetical order): aging research, behavioral sciences, biochemistry, cell biology, chemistry including analytical chemistry, clinical and preclinical studies, drug development, environmental health, ergonomics, forensic medicine, genetics, hepatology and gastroenterology, immunology, neurosciences, occupational medicine, oncology and cancer research, pharmacology, proteomics, psychiatric research, psychology, systems biology, toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信