脑卒中 2020 最低评估方案(PMIC2020):脑卒中后住院康复的多中心可行性研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Francesca Cecchi, Marco Baccini, Alessandro Sodero, Leonardo Pellicciari, Matteo Cioeta, Sanaz Pournajaf, Silvano Baratta, Susanna Lavezzi, Anna Cassio, Maurizio Massucci, Andrea Montis, Giovanni Morone, Mariangela Taricco, Marco Franceschini
{"title":"脑卒中 2020 最低评估方案(PMIC2020):脑卒中后住院康复的多中心可行性研究。","authors":"Francesca Cecchi, Marco Baccini, Alessandro Sodero, Leonardo Pellicciari, Matteo Cioeta, Sanaz Pournajaf, Silvano Baratta, Susanna Lavezzi, Anna Cassio, Maurizio Massucci, Andrea Montis, Giovanni Morone, Mariangela Taricco, Marco Franceschini","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08476-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2008, a Working Group of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) published the first minimum protocol for assessing stroke patients (PMIC) to define functional needs and outcomes. The recent PMIC revision (PMIC2020) introduces a document for all rehabilitation settings, incorporating updated measurement tools.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility and administration time (AT) in post-stroke inpatients and to examine the influence of demographic and clinical variables on AT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight Italian rehabilitation centers for post-acute inpatients.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Adult patients consecutively admitted to rehabilitation after ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, reporting the first event or recurrence, with a modified Barthel Index (mBI)<75 points, without cognitive impairment and clinical instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PMIC2020 was administered at admission (T0) and discharge (T1), recording AT of each section/ tool. A feasibility questionnaire was administered to assessors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of demographics and clinical variables on AT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-one subjects were enrolled at T0 and 139 at T1; the mean±SD AT (seconds) was 1634±401 at T0 and 1087±360 at T1 (P<0.001). National Institute of Health-Stroke Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination required the highest AT. All but two scales had significantly lower AT at T1 (P<0.05). Severe disability (as measured by mBI) was associated with higher AT than either complete or minimal/absent disability. The feasibility questionnaire showed good PMIC2020 appraisal by assessors without relevant critical issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PMIC2020 was feasible in post-acute inpatient rehabilitation settings. No relevant critical issue was raised by users. Even though more comprehensive than PMIC, PMIC2020 required only slightly more AT (27 minutes at T0 and 18 minutes at T1, on average); more AT was needed to assess patients with severe disability.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The study has immediate transferability for the National Health Service, as PMIC2020 can be routinely implemented in clinical practice and research to assess stroke patients' needs and outcomes. The updated measures allow more immediate comparisons with international data on stroke rehabilitation. Future research should investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility in other rehabilitation settings and its relevance in predicting stroke rehabilitation needs and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"741-749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Minimal assessment Protocol for Cerebral Stroke 2020 (PMIC2020): a multicenter feasibility study in post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Cecchi, Marco Baccini, Alessandro Sodero, Leonardo Pellicciari, Matteo Cioeta, Sanaz Pournajaf, Silvano Baratta, Susanna Lavezzi, Anna Cassio, Maurizio Massucci, Andrea Montis, Giovanni Morone, Mariangela Taricco, Marco Franceschini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08476-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2008, a Working Group of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) published the first minimum protocol for assessing stroke patients (PMIC) to define functional needs and outcomes. The recent PMIC revision (PMIC2020) introduces a document for all rehabilitation settings, incorporating updated measurement tools.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility and administration time (AT) in post-stroke inpatients and to examine the influence of demographic and clinical variables on AT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight Italian rehabilitation centers for post-acute inpatients.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Adult patients consecutively admitted to rehabilitation after ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, reporting the first event or recurrence, with a modified Barthel Index (mBI)<75 points, without cognitive impairment and clinical instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PMIC2020 was administered at admission (T0) and discharge (T1), recording AT of each section/ tool. A feasibility questionnaire was administered to assessors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of demographics and clinical variables on AT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-one subjects were enrolled at T0 and 139 at T1; the mean±SD AT (seconds) was 1634±401 at T0 and 1087±360 at T1 (P<0.001). National Institute of Health-Stroke Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination required the highest AT. All but two scales had significantly lower AT at T1 (P<0.05). Severe disability (as measured by mBI) was associated with higher AT than either complete or minimal/absent disability. The feasibility questionnaire showed good PMIC2020 appraisal by assessors without relevant critical issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PMIC2020 was feasible in post-acute inpatient rehabilitation settings. No relevant critical issue was raised by users. Even though more comprehensive than PMIC, PMIC2020 required only slightly more AT (27 minutes at T0 and 18 minutes at T1, on average); more AT was needed to assess patients with severe disability.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The study has immediate transferability for the National Health Service, as PMIC2020 can be routinely implemented in clinical practice and research to assess stroke patients' needs and outcomes. The updated measures allow more immediate comparisons with international data on stroke rehabilitation. Future research should investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility in other rehabilitation settings and its relevance in predicting stroke rehabilitation needs and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"741-749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08476-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08476-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2008 年,意大利物理与康复医学学会(SIMFER)的一个工作组发布了第一份评估中风患者的最低协议(PMIC),以确定功能需求和结果。目的:本研究旨在调查 PMIC2020 在中风后住院患者中的可行性和管理时间(AT),并研究人口统计学和临床变量对 AT 的影响:多中心前瞻性观察研究:地点:意大利八家为急性期后住院患者服务的康复中心:人群:缺血性/出血性脑卒中后连续接受康复治疗的成人患者,报告首次发病或复发,具有改良巴特尔指数(mBI):在入院(T0)和出院(T1)时进行 PMIC2020,记录每个部分/工具的 AT。对评估者进行可行性问卷调查。对人口统计学和临床变量对 AT 的影响进行了单变量和多变量分析:结果:151名受试者在T0和139名受试者在T1接受了治疗;平均±SD AT(秒)分别为1634±401(T0)和1087±360(T1)(PC结论:PMIC2020对术后患者是可行的:PMIC2020在急性期后住院康复环境中是可行的。用户没有提出相关的关键问题。尽管PMIC2020比PMIC更全面,但所需的AT仅略有增加(T0平均27分钟,T1平均18分钟);评估严重残疾患者需要更多的AT:临床康复影响:本研究可立即应用于国民健康服务,因为 PMIC2020 可在临床实践和研究中常规应用,以评估中风患者的需求和结果。更新后的测量方法可以更直接地与有关中风康复的国际数据进行比较。未来的研究应调查 PMIC2020 在其他康复环境中的可行性及其在预测中风康复需求和结果方面的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Minimal assessment Protocol for Cerebral Stroke 2020 (PMIC2020): a multicenter feasibility study in post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation.

Background: In 2008, a Working Group of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) published the first minimum protocol for assessing stroke patients (PMIC) to define functional needs and outcomes. The recent PMIC revision (PMIC2020) introduces a document for all rehabilitation settings, incorporating updated measurement tools.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility and administration time (AT) in post-stroke inpatients and to examine the influence of demographic and clinical variables on AT.

Design: Multicenter prospective observational study.

Setting: Eight Italian rehabilitation centers for post-acute inpatients.

Population: Adult patients consecutively admitted to rehabilitation after ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, reporting the first event or recurrence, with a modified Barthel Index (mBI)<75 points, without cognitive impairment and clinical instability.

Methods: PMIC2020 was administered at admission (T0) and discharge (T1), recording AT of each section/ tool. A feasibility questionnaire was administered to assessors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of demographics and clinical variables on AT.

Results: One hundred fifty-one subjects were enrolled at T0 and 139 at T1; the mean±SD AT (seconds) was 1634±401 at T0 and 1087±360 at T1 (P<0.001). National Institute of Health-Stroke Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination required the highest AT. All but two scales had significantly lower AT at T1 (P<0.05). Severe disability (as measured by mBI) was associated with higher AT than either complete or minimal/absent disability. The feasibility questionnaire showed good PMIC2020 appraisal by assessors without relevant critical issues.

Conclusions: PMIC2020 was feasible in post-acute inpatient rehabilitation settings. No relevant critical issue was raised by users. Even though more comprehensive than PMIC, PMIC2020 required only slightly more AT (27 minutes at T0 and 18 minutes at T1, on average); more AT was needed to assess patients with severe disability.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The study has immediate transferability for the National Health Service, as PMIC2020 can be routinely implemented in clinical practice and research to assess stroke patients' needs and outcomes. The updated measures allow more immediate comparisons with international data on stroke rehabilitation. Future research should investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility in other rehabilitation settings and its relevance in predicting stroke rehabilitation needs and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信