将 Varix Trainer 模型作为食管胃十二指肠镜检查培训设备的有效性和有效性。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2374-8476
Sarunporn Kamolvisit, Julajak Limsrivilai, Parit Mekaroonkamol, Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nalerdon Chalermsuksant, Kamin Harinwan, Chitchai Rattananukrom, Thanawin Wong, Rapat Pittayanon, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Phalat Sathirawich, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, Akharawit Pulsombat, Patarapong Kamalaporn, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Taya Kitiyakara
{"title":"将 Varix Trainer 模型作为食管胃十二指肠镜检查培训设备的有效性和有效性。","authors":"Sarunporn Kamolvisit, Julajak Limsrivilai, Parit Mekaroonkamol, Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nalerdon Chalermsuksant, Kamin Harinwan, Chitchai Rattananukrom, Thanawin Wong, Rapat Pittayanon, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Phalat Sathirawich, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, Akharawit Pulsombat, Patarapong Kamalaporn, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Taya Kitiyakara","doi":"10.1055/a-2374-8476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> The Varix Trainer model 1 (VTM1) was created for trainees to safely practice basic endoscope manipulation skills. The VTM1 was tested to see if it could distinguish levels of endoscope manipulation skills (construct validity) and whether training with it could improve these skills faster (content validity). <b>Patients and methods</b> We enrolled 23 novice endoscopists, 18 second-year trainees, and 13 expert endoscopists. They were asked to point with the endoscope tip to 20 numbers in the model as quickly as possible using torque, single-hand small/large wheel manipulation (SHSW), and retroflexion techniques. Their mean times (t20) were compared to determine if the model could distinguish different levels of expertise. Subsequently, 14 novices trained for eight short sessions, and the pre-training and post-training t20 were compared. Nine novice endoscopists received no training and were retested after 4 to 6 weeks (controls). <b>Results</b> Experts had faster t20 than second-year trainees, who were faster than novices, for all three techniques ( <i>P</i> < 0.001). After eight sessions, the mean t20 for novices improved from 112 to 66 seconds for torque, 144 to 72 seconds for SHSW, and 108 to 63 seconds for retroflexion, (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Their t20 were equivalent to second-year trainees. Improvement in t20 was also seen with the control group, but total reduction was less than for the training group. <b>Conclusions</b> The VTM1 distinguished varying levels of expertise for all techniques, suggesting that it is a valid tool for assessing endoscope manipulation skill. A short curriculum improved novices' manipulation skills faster than traditional practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 9","pages":"E1043-E1055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and efficacy of the Varix Trainer model as a Training device for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Sarunporn Kamolvisit, Julajak Limsrivilai, Parit Mekaroonkamol, Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Nalerdon Chalermsuksant, Kamin Harinwan, Chitchai Rattananukrom, Thanawin Wong, Rapat Pittayanon, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Phalat Sathirawich, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, Akharawit Pulsombat, Patarapong Kamalaporn, Jaksin Sottisuporn, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Taya Kitiyakara\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2374-8476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> The Varix Trainer model 1 (VTM1) was created for trainees to safely practice basic endoscope manipulation skills. The VTM1 was tested to see if it could distinguish levels of endoscope manipulation skills (construct validity) and whether training with it could improve these skills faster (content validity). <b>Patients and methods</b> We enrolled 23 novice endoscopists, 18 second-year trainees, and 13 expert endoscopists. They were asked to point with the endoscope tip to 20 numbers in the model as quickly as possible using torque, single-hand small/large wheel manipulation (SHSW), and retroflexion techniques. Their mean times (t20) were compared to determine if the model could distinguish different levels of expertise. Subsequently, 14 novices trained for eight short sessions, and the pre-training and post-training t20 were compared. Nine novice endoscopists received no training and were retested after 4 to 6 weeks (controls). <b>Results</b> Experts had faster t20 than second-year trainees, who were faster than novices, for all three techniques ( <i>P</i> < 0.001). After eight sessions, the mean t20 for novices improved from 112 to 66 seconds for torque, 144 to 72 seconds for SHSW, and 108 to 63 seconds for retroflexion, (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Their t20 were equivalent to second-year trainees. Improvement in t20 was also seen with the control group, but total reduction was less than for the training group. <b>Conclusions</b> The VTM1 distinguished varying levels of expertise for all techniques, suggesting that it is a valid tool for assessing endoscope manipulation skill. A short curriculum improved novices' manipulation skills faster than traditional practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"E1043-E1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2374-8476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2374-8476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 Varix Trainer 模型 1 (VTM1) 是为学员安全练习基本内窥镜操作技能而设计的。我们对 VTM1 进行了测试,以了解它是否能区分内镜操作技能的水平(结构效度),以及使用它进行培训是否能更快地提高这些技能(内容效度)。患者和方法 我们招募了 23 名内镜新手、18 名二年级实习生和 13 名内镜专家。我们要求他们使用扭矩、单手小/大轮操作(SHSW)和后屈技术,尽快用内窥镜尖端指向模型中的 20 个数字。对他们的平均时间(t20)进行比较,以确定模型是否能区分不同的专业水平。随后,14 名新手接受了 8 次短期培训,并对培训前和培训后的 t20 进行了比较。9名内镜新手没有接受培训,他们在4至6周后接受了复测(对照组)。结果 在所有三种技术中,专家的 t20 比二年级学员快,而二年级学员比新手快(P < 0.001)。八次训练后,新手的平均 t20 从 112 秒提高到 66 秒(扭矩),从 144 秒提高到 72 秒(SHSW),从 108 秒提高到 63 秒(后屈)(所有 P < 0.001)。他们的 t20 与二年级学员相当。对照组的 t20 也有所改善,但减少的总时间少于训练组。结论 VTM1 能区分所有技术的不同专业水平,表明它是评估内窥镜操作技能的有效工具。短期课程比传统练习更快地提高了新手的操作技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and efficacy of the Varix Trainer model as a Training device for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Background and study aims The Varix Trainer model 1 (VTM1) was created for trainees to safely practice basic endoscope manipulation skills. The VTM1 was tested to see if it could distinguish levels of endoscope manipulation skills (construct validity) and whether training with it could improve these skills faster (content validity). Patients and methods We enrolled 23 novice endoscopists, 18 second-year trainees, and 13 expert endoscopists. They were asked to point with the endoscope tip to 20 numbers in the model as quickly as possible using torque, single-hand small/large wheel manipulation (SHSW), and retroflexion techniques. Their mean times (t20) were compared to determine if the model could distinguish different levels of expertise. Subsequently, 14 novices trained for eight short sessions, and the pre-training and post-training t20 were compared. Nine novice endoscopists received no training and were retested after 4 to 6 weeks (controls). Results Experts had faster t20 than second-year trainees, who were faster than novices, for all three techniques ( P < 0.001). After eight sessions, the mean t20 for novices improved from 112 to 66 seconds for torque, 144 to 72 seconds for SHSW, and 108 to 63 seconds for retroflexion, (all P < 0.001). Their t20 were equivalent to second-year trainees. Improvement in t20 was also seen with the control group, but total reduction was less than for the training group. Conclusions The VTM1 distinguished varying levels of expertise for all techniques, suggesting that it is a valid tool for assessing endoscope manipulation skill. A short curriculum improved novices' manipulation skills faster than traditional practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信