Hyo-Suk Ahn, Hyojin Chae, Yeongsic Kim, Hey Kyung Lee, Hyunjung Kim
{"title":"用于测定阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和埃多沙班等直接抗凝剂的肝素校准抗因子 Xa 检测试剂盒。","authors":"Hyo-Suk Ahn, Hyojin Chae, Yeongsic Kim, Hey Kyung Lee, Hyunjung Kim","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first purpose of this study was to determine whether a measurement of the level of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was possible with heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity (AXA). The second purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the antidote treatment decision level (30 or 50 ng/mL of DOAC) can be determined by unfractionated heparin (UHF)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated AXA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AXA was measured by using two reagents and dedicated analyzers (Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer and STA R Max3). Four types of calibrators were used: 1) Stago DOAC (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban)-specific calibrator, 2) Stago LMWH calibrator, 3) Sysmex UHF calibrator, and 4) Sysmex LMWH calibrator. Regression analysis was used between assays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, and the concordance rate was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.75 - 0.91 for rivaroxaban and 0.81 - 0.94 for apixaban. The correlation coefficient between edoxaban-calibrated AXA and Sysmex LMWH/Sysmex UHF calibrator-calibrated AXA was low (r = 0.47). Overall correlation between DOAC-calibrated AXA and Stago LMWH-calibrated AXA was linear, at only low concentration in all three DOACs. The concordance rate (89.3 - 100%) is good for de-termining the antidote management level by UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA, compared with those of DOAC-calibrated AXA in rivaroxaban and apixaban. The concordance rate ranged from 63% to 67% between Sysmex UFH/ LMWH-calibrated AXA and edoxaban-calibrated AXA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of our study suggest limitations in calculating accurate concentrations, when using UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA to measure DOAC. This study demonstrates that UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA may be useful in determining the presence of DOACs at the cutoff level for the antidote treatment in rivarovaban and apixaban. However, in edoxaban, UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA could not accurately measure the presence of DOACs at the cutoff for antidote treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heparin-Calibrated Anti-Factor Xa Assay for the Measurement of Direct Anticoagulants such as Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban.\",\"authors\":\"Hyo-Suk Ahn, Hyojin Chae, Yeongsic Kim, Hey Kyung Lee, Hyunjung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first purpose of this study was to determine whether a measurement of the level of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was possible with heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity (AXA). The second purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the antidote treatment decision level (30 or 50 ng/mL of DOAC) can be determined by unfractionated heparin (UHF)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated AXA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AXA was measured by using two reagents and dedicated analyzers (Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer and STA R Max3). Four types of calibrators were used: 1) Stago DOAC (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban)-specific calibrator, 2) Stago LMWH calibrator, 3) Sysmex UHF calibrator, and 4) Sysmex LMWH calibrator. Regression analysis was used between assays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, and the concordance rate was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.75 - 0.91 for rivaroxaban and 0.81 - 0.94 for apixaban. The correlation coefficient between edoxaban-calibrated AXA and Sysmex LMWH/Sysmex UHF calibrator-calibrated AXA was low (r = 0.47). Overall correlation between DOAC-calibrated AXA and Stago LMWH-calibrated AXA was linear, at only low concentration in all three DOACs. The concordance rate (89.3 - 100%) is good for de-termining the antidote management level by UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA, compared with those of DOAC-calibrated AXA in rivaroxaban and apixaban. The concordance rate ranged from 63% to 67% between Sysmex UFH/ LMWH-calibrated AXA and edoxaban-calibrated AXA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of our study suggest limitations in calculating accurate concentrations, when using UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA to measure DOAC. This study demonstrates that UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA may be useful in determining the presence of DOACs at the cutoff level for the antidote treatment in rivarovaban and apixaban. However, in edoxaban, UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA could not accurately measure the presence of DOACs at the cutoff for antidote treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"volume\":\"70 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究的第一个目的是确定是否可以用肝素校准色原抗因子 Xa 活性(AXA)来测量直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的水平。本研究的第二个目的是评估解毒剂治疗决策水平(30 或 50 纳克/毫升的 DOAC)是否可以通过非分数肝素(UHF)/低分子量肝素(LMWH)校准 AXA 来确定:使用两种试剂和专用分析仪(Sysmex CS-5100 分析仪和 STA R Max3)测量 AXA。使用了四种校准物:1)Stago DOAC(利伐沙班、依多沙班和阿哌沙班)专用校准物;2)Stago LMWH 校准物;3)Sysmex UHF 校准物;4)Sysmex LMWH 校准物。检测方法之间采用回归分析。绘制了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),并计算了吻合率:利伐沙班的相关系数在 0.75 - 0.91 之间,阿哌沙班的相关系数在 0.81 - 0.94 之间。埃多沙班校准过的 AXA 与 Sysmex LMWH/Sysmex UHF 校准器校准过的 AXA 之间的相关系数较低(r = 0.47)。DOAC 校准 AXA 与 Stago LMWH 校准 AXA 之间的总体相关性呈线性关系,但三种 DOAC 的浓度都很低。与利伐沙班和阿哌沙班的 DOAC 校准 AXA 相比,UFH/LMWH 校准 AXA 的吻合率(89.3 - 100%)可很好地确定解毒剂管理水平。Sysmex UFH/ LMWH 校准 AXA 与埃多沙班校准 AXA 的一致率为 63% 至 67%:我们的研究结果表明,使用 UFH/LMWH 校准 AXA 测量 DOAC 时,在计算准确浓度方面存在局限性。这项研究表明,UFH/LMWH 校准 AXA 可用于确定利伐伐班和阿哌沙班的解毒剂治疗临界水平是否存在 DOAC。然而,对于依多沙班,UFH/LMWH 校准 AXA 无法准确测量解毒剂治疗临界值处是否存在 DOAC。
Heparin-Calibrated Anti-Factor Xa Assay for the Measurement of Direct Anticoagulants such as Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban.
Background: The first purpose of this study was to determine whether a measurement of the level of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was possible with heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity (AXA). The second purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the antidote treatment decision level (30 or 50 ng/mL of DOAC) can be determined by unfractionated heparin (UHF)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated AXA.
Methods: AXA was measured by using two reagents and dedicated analyzers (Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer and STA R Max3). Four types of calibrators were used: 1) Stago DOAC (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban)-specific calibrator, 2) Stago LMWH calibrator, 3) Sysmex UHF calibrator, and 4) Sysmex LMWH calibrator. Regression analysis was used between assays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, and the concordance rate was calculated.
Results: The correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.75 - 0.91 for rivaroxaban and 0.81 - 0.94 for apixaban. The correlation coefficient between edoxaban-calibrated AXA and Sysmex LMWH/Sysmex UHF calibrator-calibrated AXA was low (r = 0.47). Overall correlation between DOAC-calibrated AXA and Stago LMWH-calibrated AXA was linear, at only low concentration in all three DOACs. The concordance rate (89.3 - 100%) is good for de-termining the antidote management level by UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA, compared with those of DOAC-calibrated AXA in rivaroxaban and apixaban. The concordance rate ranged from 63% to 67% between Sysmex UFH/ LMWH-calibrated AXA and edoxaban-calibrated AXA.
Conclusions: The findings of our study suggest limitations in calculating accurate concentrations, when using UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA to measure DOAC. This study demonstrates that UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA may be useful in determining the presence of DOACs at the cutoff level for the antidote treatment in rivarovaban and apixaban. However, in edoxaban, UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA could not accurately measure the presence of DOACs at the cutoff for antidote treatment.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.