鼻咽部样本中未检测到 SARS-CoV-2,但在支气管肺泡液中检测到了 SARS-CoV-2。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Fucun Ma, Jiaying Hu, Mingjian Bai, Xuekai Liu, Guowei Liang
{"title":"鼻咽部样本中未检测到 SARS-CoV-2,但在支气管肺泡液中检测到了 SARS-CoV-2。","authors":"Fucun Ma, Jiaying Hu, Mingjian Bai, Xuekai Liu, Guowei Liang","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 not Detected in the Nasopharyngeal Sample but in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Fucun Ma, Jiaying Hu, Mingjian Bai, Xuekai Liu, Guowei Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"volume\":\"70 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的检测通常依赖于反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)技术。然而,鼻咽样本中的 SARS-CoV-2 存在一定的漏检率,尤其是在免疫抑制人群中:在本病例中,使用 RT-PCR 技术在鼻咽拭子和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中检测到了 SARS-CoV-2。肺部成像是通过计算机断层扫描(CT)进行的。患者的临床数据来自实验室信息系统(LIS):结果:SARS-CoV-2 在患者的两次鼻咽部检测中均为阴性,但最终在 BALF 中检测到了 SARS-CoV-2,证实肺部病变是由 SARS-CoV-2 感染的:结论:在后疫情时代,对于免疫抑制的肺部感染患者,尤其是鼻咽部检测结果为阴性的患者,在排除其他因素的情况下,有必要使用 BALF 来确定是否感染了 SARS-CoV-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SARS-CoV-2 not Detected in the Nasopharyngeal Sample but in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals.

Methods: In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS).

Results: SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusions: In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信