基于图表的噪声对比敏感度测试:参考范围、年龄和光学异常的影响。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J Jason McAnany, Frederick T Collison
{"title":"基于图表的噪声对比敏感度测试:参考范围、年龄和光学异常的影响。","authors":"J Jason McAnany, Frederick T Collison","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2024.2402834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Contrast sensitivity plays an important role in the comprehensive assessment of visual function; however, measurement with standard eye charts can be affected by age and optical abnormality.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>This study describes a novel chart-based test of letter contrast sensitivity (CS) in luminance noise (the Illinois Eye and Ear Noise CS test), defines normal reference ranges, estimates test-retest repeatability, and assesses the effects of age and simulated optical abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five individuals with normal visual function (age 18-85 years) participated. Subjects identified letter optotypes that spanned a broad contrast range (0.9% to 59.6%) printed in a book-based test. Letters were presented against a grey background (no-noise condition) and in luminance noise that consisted of light and dark checks (noise condition). A subset of 10 subjects repeated the test to define short-term variability and performed the test under three additional conditions: simulated cataract, +2.00D defocus, and low room illuminance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the no-noise condition, CS was independent of age (mean log CS of 1.74) until approximately 54 years, and declined for older subjects (CS loss of 0.1 log unit/decade). CS measured in noise was independent of age across the range of ages tested (mean log CS of 0.91). The 95% limits of agreement for test-retest repeatability was 0.19 log units. Simulated cataract, +2.00D defocus, and reduced illumination significantly reduced CS in the no-noise condition (F = 102.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas these optical manipulations did not significantly affect CS in noise (F = 2.58, <i>p</i> = 0.074).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurements of CS in luminance noise may be valuable, as these measures are largely independent of age and certain forms of optical degradation. CS measurements in noise may provide useful insight into visual function in patients who have combined neural and optical abnormality, as noise minimises CS loss from optical defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A chart-based test of contrast sensitivity in noise: reference ranges, effects of age and optical abnormality.\",\"authors\":\"J Jason McAnany, Frederick T Collison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164622.2024.2402834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Contrast sensitivity plays an important role in the comprehensive assessment of visual function; however, measurement with standard eye charts can be affected by age and optical abnormality.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>This study describes a novel chart-based test of letter contrast sensitivity (CS) in luminance noise (the Illinois Eye and Ear Noise CS test), defines normal reference ranges, estimates test-retest repeatability, and assesses the effects of age and simulated optical abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five individuals with normal visual function (age 18-85 years) participated. Subjects identified letter optotypes that spanned a broad contrast range (0.9% to 59.6%) printed in a book-based test. Letters were presented against a grey background (no-noise condition) and in luminance noise that consisted of light and dark checks (noise condition). A subset of 10 subjects repeated the test to define short-term variability and performed the test under three additional conditions: simulated cataract, +2.00D defocus, and low room illuminance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the no-noise condition, CS was independent of age (mean log CS of 1.74) until approximately 54 years, and declined for older subjects (CS loss of 0.1 log unit/decade). CS measured in noise was independent of age across the range of ages tested (mean log CS of 0.91). The 95% limits of agreement for test-retest repeatability was 0.19 log units. Simulated cataract, +2.00D defocus, and reduced illumination significantly reduced CS in the no-noise condition (F = 102.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas these optical manipulations did not significantly affect CS in noise (F = 2.58, <i>p</i> = 0.074).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurements of CS in luminance noise may be valuable, as these measures are largely independent of age and certain forms of optical degradation. CS measurements in noise may provide useful insight into visual function in patients who have combined neural and optical abnormality, as noise minimises CS loss from optical defects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2402834\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2402834","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床意义:对比敏感度在视觉功能的综合评估中起着重要作用;然而,使用标准眼图进行测量会受到年龄和光学异常的影响:本研究介绍了一种基于图表的新型亮度噪声字母对比敏感度(CS)测试(伊利诺伊眼耳噪声 CS 测试),定义了正常参考范围,估计了测试重复性,并评估了年龄和模拟光学异常的影响:方法:75 名视力正常者(18-85 岁)参加了测试。受试者识别了书本测试中印制的对比度范围较广(0.9% 到 59.6%)的字母光型。字母在灰色背景(无噪声条件)和亮度噪声(噪声条件)下呈现,噪声由明暗对照组成。10 名受试者中的一个子集重复了测试以确定短期变异性,并在另外三种条件下进行了测试:模拟白内障、+2.00D 散焦和低室内照度:在无噪声条件下,CS 与年龄无关(平均对数 CS 为 1.74),直到 54 岁左右,年龄越大,CS 越低(CS 损失为 0.1 对数单位/十年)。在噪音条件下测量的 CS 值在测试的所有年龄范围内均与年龄无关(平均对数 CS 值为 0.91)。测试重复性的 95% 一致度为 0.19 对数单位。在无噪声条件下,模拟白内障、+2.00D 散焦和照度降低会显著降低 CS(F = 102.6,P = 0.074):结论:在亮度噪声中测量 CS 可能很有价值,因为这些测量在很大程度上与年龄和某些形式的光学退化无关。噪声中的 CS 测量可帮助人们深入了解神经和光学共同异常的患者的视觉功能,因为噪声可将光学缺陷造成的 CS 损失降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A chart-based test of contrast sensitivity in noise: reference ranges, effects of age and optical abnormality.

Clinical relevance: Contrast sensitivity plays an important role in the comprehensive assessment of visual function; however, measurement with standard eye charts can be affected by age and optical abnormality.

Background: This study describes a novel chart-based test of letter contrast sensitivity (CS) in luminance noise (the Illinois Eye and Ear Noise CS test), defines normal reference ranges, estimates test-retest repeatability, and assesses the effects of age and simulated optical abnormalities.

Methods: Seventy-five individuals with normal visual function (age 18-85 years) participated. Subjects identified letter optotypes that spanned a broad contrast range (0.9% to 59.6%) printed in a book-based test. Letters were presented against a grey background (no-noise condition) and in luminance noise that consisted of light and dark checks (noise condition). A subset of 10 subjects repeated the test to define short-term variability and performed the test under three additional conditions: simulated cataract, +2.00D defocus, and low room illuminance.

Results: In the no-noise condition, CS was independent of age (mean log CS of 1.74) until approximately 54 years, and declined for older subjects (CS loss of 0.1 log unit/decade). CS measured in noise was independent of age across the range of ages tested (mean log CS of 0.91). The 95% limits of agreement for test-retest repeatability was 0.19 log units. Simulated cataract, +2.00D defocus, and reduced illumination significantly reduced CS in the no-noise condition (F = 102.6, p < 0.001), whereas these optical manipulations did not significantly affect CS in noise (F = 2.58, p = 0.074).

Conclusions: Measurements of CS in luminance noise may be valuable, as these measures are largely independent of age and certain forms of optical degradation. CS measurements in noise may provide useful insight into visual function in patients who have combined neural and optical abnormality, as noise minimises CS loss from optical defects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信