捐献心脏接受移植的预测及其临床意义:捐献心脏研究的结果

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011360
Brian Wayda, Yingjie Weng, Shiqi Zhang, Helen Luikart, Thomas Pearson, Javier Nieto, Bruce Nicely, P J Geraghty, John Belcher, John Nguyen, Nikole Neidlinger, Tahnee Groat, Darren Malinoski, Jonathan G Zaroff, Kiran K Khush
{"title":"捐献心脏接受移植的预测及其临床意义:捐献心脏研究的结果","authors":"Brian Wayda, Yingjie Weng, Shiqi Zhang, Helen Luikart, Thomas Pearson, Javier Nieto, Bruce Nicely, P J Geraghty, John Belcher, John Nguyen, Nikole Neidlinger, Tahnee Groat, Darren Malinoski, Jonathan G Zaroff, Kiran K Khush","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a shortage of potential donors for heart transplant in the United States, most potential donor hearts are discarded. We evaluated predictors of donor heart acceptance in the United States and applied machine learning methods to improve prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included a nationwide (2005-2020) cohort of potential heart donors in the United States (n=73 948) from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and a more recent (2015-2020) rigorously phenotyped cohort of potential donors from DHS (Donor Heart Study; n=4130). We identified predictors of acceptance for heart transplant in both cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, incorporating time-interaction terms to characterize their varying effects over time. We fit models predicting acceptance for transplant in a 50% training subset of DHS using logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest algorithms and compared their performance in the remaining 50% (test) of the subset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predictors of donor heart acceptance were similar in the nationwide and DHS cohorts. Among these, older age (<i>P</i> value for time interaction, 0.0001) has become increasingly predictive of discard over time while other factors, including those related to drug use, infection, and mild cardiac diagnostic abnormalities, have become less influential (<i>P</i> value for time interaction, <0.05 for all). A random forest model (area under the curve, 0.908; accuracy, 0.831) outperformed other prediction algorithms in the test subset and was used as the basis of a novel web-based prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictors of donor heart acceptance for transplantation have changed significantly over the last 2 decades, likely reflecting evolving evidence regarding their impact on posttransplant outcomes. Real-time prediction of donor heart acceptance, using our web-based tool, may improve efficiency during donor management and heart allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e011360"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Donor Heart Acceptance for Transplant and Its Clinical Implications: Results From The Donor Heart Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Wayda, Yingjie Weng, Shiqi Zhang, Helen Luikart, Thomas Pearson, Javier Nieto, Bruce Nicely, P J Geraghty, John Belcher, John Nguyen, Nikole Neidlinger, Tahnee Groat, Darren Malinoski, Jonathan G Zaroff, Kiran K Khush\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a shortage of potential donors for heart transplant in the United States, most potential donor hearts are discarded. We evaluated predictors of donor heart acceptance in the United States and applied machine learning methods to improve prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included a nationwide (2005-2020) cohort of potential heart donors in the United States (n=73 948) from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and a more recent (2015-2020) rigorously phenotyped cohort of potential donors from DHS (Donor Heart Study; n=4130). We identified predictors of acceptance for heart transplant in both cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, incorporating time-interaction terms to characterize their varying effects over time. We fit models predicting acceptance for transplant in a 50% training subset of DHS using logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest algorithms and compared their performance in the remaining 50% (test) of the subset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predictors of donor heart acceptance were similar in the nationwide and DHS cohorts. Among these, older age (<i>P</i> value for time interaction, 0.0001) has become increasingly predictive of discard over time while other factors, including those related to drug use, infection, and mild cardiac diagnostic abnormalities, have become less influential (<i>P</i> value for time interaction, <0.05 for all). A random forest model (area under the curve, 0.908; accuracy, 0.831) outperformed other prediction algorithms in the test subset and was used as the basis of a novel web-based prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictors of donor heart acceptance for transplantation have changed significantly over the last 2 decades, likely reflecting evolving evidence regarding their impact on posttransplant outcomes. Real-time prediction of donor heart acceptance, using our web-based tool, may improve efficiency during donor management and heart allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011360\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管美国缺乏潜在的心脏移植供体,但大多数潜在的供体心脏都被丢弃。我们评估了美国接受供体心脏的预测因素,并应用机器学习方法改进预测:我们纳入了移植受者科学登记处(Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients)的全美(2005-2020 年)潜在心脏捐献者队列(n=73 948)和 DHS(心脏捐献者研究;n=4130)的最新(2015-2020 年)潜在捐献者严格表型队列。我们使用多变量逻辑回归确定了这两个队列中接受心脏移植的预测因素,并纳入了时间交互项,以描述其随时间变化而产生的不同影响。我们使用逻辑回归、最小绝对缩减和选择算子以及随机森林算法在 50%的 DHS 训练子集中拟合了预测接受移植的模型,并比较了它们在剩余 50%(测试)子集中的表现:全国和 DHS 群体接受心脏捐献的预测因素相似。其中,随着时间的推移,年龄越大(时间交互作用的 P 值为 0.0001)对心脏捐献的预测性越强,而其他因素,包括与药物使用、感染和轻度心脏诊断异常有关的因素,其影响力则越小(时间交互作用的 P 值为 0.0001):在过去 20 年中,接受移植供体心脏的预测因素发生了显著变化,这可能反映了有关这些因素对移植后预后影响的证据在不断发展。使用我们的网络工具实时预测供体心脏的接受程度,可以提高供体管理和心脏分配的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Donor Heart Acceptance for Transplant and Its Clinical Implications: Results From The Donor Heart Study.

Background: Despite a shortage of potential donors for heart transplant in the United States, most potential donor hearts are discarded. We evaluated predictors of donor heart acceptance in the United States and applied machine learning methods to improve prediction.

Methods: We included a nationwide (2005-2020) cohort of potential heart donors in the United States (n=73 948) from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and a more recent (2015-2020) rigorously phenotyped cohort of potential donors from DHS (Donor Heart Study; n=4130). We identified predictors of acceptance for heart transplant in both cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, incorporating time-interaction terms to characterize their varying effects over time. We fit models predicting acceptance for transplant in a 50% training subset of DHS using logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest algorithms and compared their performance in the remaining 50% (test) of the subset.

Results: Predictors of donor heart acceptance were similar in the nationwide and DHS cohorts. Among these, older age (P value for time interaction, 0.0001) has become increasingly predictive of discard over time while other factors, including those related to drug use, infection, and mild cardiac diagnostic abnormalities, have become less influential (P value for time interaction, <0.05 for all). A random forest model (area under the curve, 0.908; accuracy, 0.831) outperformed other prediction algorithms in the test subset and was used as the basis of a novel web-based prediction tool.

Conclusions: Predictors of donor heart acceptance for transplantation have changed significantly over the last 2 decades, likely reflecting evolving evidence regarding their impact on posttransplant outcomes. Real-time prediction of donor heart acceptance, using our web-based tool, may improve efficiency during donor management and heart allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信