Si Jian Hui, Naresh Kumar, Jiong Hao Tan, Sahil Athia, Shahid Ali, Seok Woo Kim
{"title":"AB075.什么情况下微创脊柱手术不适合转移性脊柱疾病？","authors":"Si Jian Hui, Naresh Kumar, Jiong Hao Tan, Sahil Athia, Shahid Ali, Seok Woo Kim","doi":"10.21037/cco-24-ab075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS) is an important treatment modality of metastatic spinal disease (MSD). Open spine surgery (OSS) was previously the gold standard of treatment. However, advancements in MSTS in recent years has resulted in a current paradigm shift towards today's gold standard of minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) and early adjuvant RT in treating MSD patients. Nonetheless, there are still certain situations whereby MISS is not desirable or even suitable. There has also yet to be any literature describing the considerations for not using MISS in MSD in today's clinical context. We aim to bridge the gap where OSS should be considered with caution and highlight situations where MISS is preferable using the available literature and personal experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), The Cochrane Library and Scopus databases through August 31, 2023. Inclusion criteria for the review were studies with discussion on the type of surgery in MSTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 studies were included in this review. We discussed various advantages and situations appropriate for MISS for MSD in today's clinical context. Nonetheless, there are still various unique circumstances in which MISS may be less suitable. MISS is less feasible in patients of paediatric profile, having short stature or having had previous surgery at the level of operation. Occipitocervical and cervicothoracic location of vertebrae metastasis also makes MISS less feasible due to access and imaging difficulty. MISS for tumours which are hypersclerotic and hypervascular can also result in more difficulty for cannulation of MISS probes as well as control of bleeding respectively, and hence will be less encouraged in the above settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review will be the first to discuss circumstances in which MISS is less applicable, despite the advantages it may confer over traditional OSS. MSTS should be individualized to the patient, depending on the experience of the surgeon. OSS is still a time-tested approach that holds weight in MSTS and should be readily utilized depending on the clinical situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AB075. When would minimally invasive spinal surgery not be preferable for metastatic spine disease?-a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Si Jian Hui, Naresh Kumar, Jiong Hao Tan, Sahil Athia, Shahid Ali, Seok Woo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/cco-24-ab075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS) is an important treatment modality of metastatic spinal disease (MSD). Open spine surgery (OSS) was previously the gold standard of treatment. However, advancements in MSTS in recent years has resulted in a current paradigm shift towards today's gold standard of minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) and early adjuvant RT in treating MSD patients. Nonetheless, there are still certain situations whereby MISS is not desirable or even suitable. There has also yet to be any literature describing the considerations for not using MISS in MSD in today's clinical context. We aim to bridge the gap where OSS should be considered with caution and highlight situations where MISS is preferable using the available literature and personal experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), The Cochrane Library and Scopus databases through August 31, 2023. Inclusion criteria for the review were studies with discussion on the type of surgery in MSTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 studies were included in this review. We discussed various advantages and situations appropriate for MISS for MSD in today's clinical context. Nonetheless, there are still various unique circumstances in which MISS may be less suitable. MISS is less feasible in patients of paediatric profile, having short stature or having had previous surgery at the level of operation. Occipitocervical and cervicothoracic location of vertebrae metastasis also makes MISS less feasible due to access and imaging difficulty. MISS for tumours which are hypersclerotic and hypervascular can also result in more difficulty for cannulation of MISS probes as well as control of bleeding respectively, and hence will be less encouraged in the above settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review will be the first to discuss circumstances in which MISS is less applicable, despite the advantages it may confer over traditional OSS. MSTS should be individualized to the patient, depending on the experience of the surgeon. OSS is still a time-tested approach that holds weight in MSTS and should be readily utilized depending on the clinical situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
AB075. When would minimally invasive spinal surgery not be preferable for metastatic spine disease?-a narrative review.
Background: Metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS) is an important treatment modality of metastatic spinal disease (MSD). Open spine surgery (OSS) was previously the gold standard of treatment. However, advancements in MSTS in recent years has resulted in a current paradigm shift towards today's gold standard of minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) and early adjuvant RT in treating MSD patients. Nonetheless, there are still certain situations whereby MISS is not desirable or even suitable. There has also yet to be any literature describing the considerations for not using MISS in MSD in today's clinical context. We aim to bridge the gap where OSS should be considered with caution and highlight situations where MISS is preferable using the available literature and personal experience.
Methods: This narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), The Cochrane Library and Scopus databases through August 31, 2023. Inclusion criteria for the review were studies with discussion on the type of surgery in MSTS.
Results: A total of 52 studies were included in this review. We discussed various advantages and situations appropriate for MISS for MSD in today's clinical context. Nonetheless, there are still various unique circumstances in which MISS may be less suitable. MISS is less feasible in patients of paediatric profile, having short stature or having had previous surgery at the level of operation. Occipitocervical and cervicothoracic location of vertebrae metastasis also makes MISS less feasible due to access and imaging difficulty. MISS for tumours which are hypersclerotic and hypervascular can also result in more difficulty for cannulation of MISS probes as well as control of bleeding respectively, and hence will be less encouraged in the above settings.
Conclusions: Our review will be the first to discuss circumstances in which MISS is less applicable, despite the advantages it may confer over traditional OSS. MSTS should be individualized to the patient, depending on the experience of the surgeon. OSS is still a time-tested approach that holds weight in MSTS and should be readily utilized depending on the clinical situation.
期刊介绍：
The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
