GLI 肺活量测定参考方程对东北亚慢性阻塞性肺病患者的影响。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.048
Joon Young Choi, Chang-Hoon Lee, Hyonsoo Joo, Yun Su Sim, Jaechun Lee, Hyun Lee, Kwang Ha Yoo, Seoung Ju Park, Ju Ock Na, Yet Hong Khor
{"title":"GLI 肺活量测定参考方程对东北亚慢性阻塞性肺病患者的影响。","authors":"Joon Young Choi, Chang-Hoon Lee, Hyonsoo Joo, Yun Su Sim, Jaechun Lee, Hyun Lee, Kwang Ha Yoo, Seoung Ju Park, Ju Ock Na, Yet Hong Khor","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate spirometry interpretation is critical in the diagnosis and management of COPD. With increasing efforts for a unified approach by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI), this study evaluated the application of race-specific 2012 GLI and race-neutral 2022 GLI reference equations compared with Choi's reference equations, which is derived and widely used in South Korea, for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the effects of applying race-specific 2012 GLI, race-neutral 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations on the diagnosis, severity grade, and clinical outcome associations of COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Serial spirometry data from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) consisting of 3,477 patients were used for reanalysis using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations. The COPD diagnosis and severity categorization, associations with disease manifestations and health outcomes, and longitudinal trajectories of lung function were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was strong concordance in COPD diagnosis comparing 2012 GLI, and 2022 GLI reference equations with Choi's reference equations, a notable portion of patients were reclassified to milder disease severity (17.0% and 23.4% for 2012 GLI and 2022 GLI reference equations, respectively). Relationships between FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted values calculated using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's equations with clinical outcomes including dyspnea severity, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations remain consistently significant. Similar annual decline rates of FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC % predicted were observed among the reference equations used, except for slower annual decline rate of FEV<sub>1</sub> in Choi's equation compared with 2022 GLI race-neutral equation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Application of GLI reference equations for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD has potential implications on disease severity grade for clinical management and trial participation, and maintains consistent significant relationships with key disease outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of Global Lung Function Initiative Spirometry Reference Equations in Northeast Asian Patients With COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Joon Young Choi, Chang-Hoon Lee, Hyonsoo Joo, Yun Su Sim, Jaechun Lee, Hyun Lee, Kwang Ha Yoo, Seoung Ju Park, Ju Ock Na, Yet Hong Khor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate spirometry interpretation is critical in the diagnosis and management of COPD. With increasing efforts for a unified approach by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI), this study evaluated the application of race-specific 2012 GLI and race-neutral 2022 GLI reference equations compared with Choi's reference equations, which is derived and widely used in South Korea, for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the effects of applying race-specific 2012 GLI, race-neutral 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations on the diagnosis, severity grade, and clinical outcome associations of COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Serial spirometry data from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) consisting of 3,477 patients were used for reanalysis using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations. The COPD diagnosis and severity categorization, associations with disease manifestations and health outcomes, and longitudinal trajectories of lung function were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was strong concordance in COPD diagnosis comparing 2012 GLI, and 2022 GLI reference equations with Choi's reference equations, a notable portion of patients were reclassified to milder disease severity (17.0% and 23.4% for 2012 GLI and 2022 GLI reference equations, respectively). Relationships between FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted values calculated using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's equations with clinical outcomes including dyspnea severity, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations remain consistently significant. Similar annual decline rates of FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC % predicted were observed among the reference equations used, except for slower annual decline rate of FEV<sub>1</sub> in Choi's equation compared with 2022 GLI race-neutral equation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Application of GLI reference equations for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD has potential implications on disease severity grade for clinical management and trial participation, and maintains consistent significant relationships with key disease outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.048\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确判读肺活量对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的诊断和管理至关重要。随着全球肺功能倡议(GLI)越来越多地采用统一的方法,本研究评估了特定种族的 2012-GLI 和种族中立的 2022-GLI 参考方程与崔氏参考方程(崔氏参考方程源自韩国并在韩国广泛使用)在 COPD 东北亚患者肺活量测定中的应用情况:研究设计和方法:使用 2012-GLI、2022-GLI 和 Choi 参考方程重新分析了韩国 COPD 亚组研究(KOCOSS)中 3477 名患者的序列肺活量数据。对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的诊断和严重程度分类、与疾病表现和健康结果的关联以及肺功能的纵向轨迹进行了测定:尽管 2012-GLI 和 2022-GLI 参考方程与崔氏参考方程在慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断方面具有很高的一致性,但仍有相当一部分患者被重新分类为疾病严重程度较轻的患者(2012-GLI 和 2022-GLI 参考方程分别为 17.0% 和 23.4%)。使用 2012-GLI、2022-GLI 和 Choi 方程计算的 FEV1 百分比预测值与临床结果(包括呼吸困难严重程度、运动能力、健康相关生活质量和病情加重频率)之间的关系始终显著。与 2022-GLI 种族中性方程相比,除了 Choi 方程的 FEV1 年下降率较慢外,其他所用参考方程的 FEV1 和 FVC 预测百分比的年下降率相似:在东北亚慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺活量测定中应用 GLI 参考方程对临床管理和参与试验的疾病严重程度分级有潜在影响,并与主要疾病结局保持一致的显著关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implications of Global Lung Function Initiative Spirometry Reference Equations in Northeast Asian Patients With COPD.

Background: Accurate spirometry interpretation is critical in the diagnosis and management of COPD. With increasing efforts for a unified approach by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI), this study evaluated the application of race-specific 2012 GLI and race-neutral 2022 GLI reference equations compared with Choi's reference equations, which is derived and widely used in South Korea, for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD.

Research question: What are the effects of applying race-specific 2012 GLI, race-neutral 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations on the diagnosis, severity grade, and clinical outcome associations of COPD?

Study design and methods: Serial spirometry data from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) consisting of 3,477 patients were used for reanalysis using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations. The COPD diagnosis and severity categorization, associations with disease manifestations and health outcomes, and longitudinal trajectories of lung function were determined.

Results: Although there was strong concordance in COPD diagnosis comparing 2012 GLI, and 2022 GLI reference equations with Choi's reference equations, a notable portion of patients were reclassified to milder disease severity (17.0% and 23.4% for 2012 GLI and 2022 GLI reference equations, respectively). Relationships between FEV1 % predicted values calculated using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's equations with clinical outcomes including dyspnea severity, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations remain consistently significant. Similar annual decline rates of FEV1 and FVC % predicted were observed among the reference equations used, except for slower annual decline rate of FEV1 in Choi's equation compared with 2022 GLI race-neutral equation.

Interpretation: Application of GLI reference equations for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD has potential implications on disease severity grade for clinical management and trial participation, and maintains consistent significant relationships with key disease outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信