Merel van der Stelt, Bo Berends, Marco Papenburg, Tom Langenhuyzen, Thomas Maal, Lars Brouwers, Guido de Jong, Ruud Leijendekkers
{"title":"利用人工智能评估胫骨假体插座形状设计的有效性:与传统石膏支架设计的临床比较。","authors":"Merel van der Stelt, Bo Berends, Marco Papenburg, Tom Langenhuyzen, Thomas Maal, Lars Brouwers, Guido de Jong, Ruud Leijendekkers","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of creating an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to enhance prosthetic socket shapes for transtibial prostheses, aiming for a less operator-dependent, standardized approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study comprised 2 phases: first, developing an AI algorithm in a cross-sectional study to predict prosthetic socket shapes. Second, testing the AI-predicted digitally measured and standardized designed (DMSD) prosthetic socket against a manually measured and designed (MMD) prosthetic socket in a 2-week within-subject cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was done at the rehabilitation department of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The AI algorithm was developed using retrospective data from 116 patients from a Dutch orthopedic company, OIM Orthopedie, and tested on 10 randomly selected participants from Papenburg Orthopedie.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Utilization of an AI algorithm to enhance the shape of a transtibial prosthetic socket.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The algorithm was optimized to minimize the error in the test set. Participants' socket comfort score and fitting ratings from an independent physiotherapist and prosthetist were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predicted prosthetic shapes deviated by 2.51 mm from the actual designs. In total, 8 of 10 DMSD and all 10 MMD-prosthetic sockets were satisfactory for home testing. Participants rated DMSD-prosthetic sockets at 7.1 ± 2.2 (n=8) and MMD-prosthetic sockets at 6.6 ± 1.2 (n=10) on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates promising results for using an AI algorithm in prosthetic socket design, but long-term effectiveness and refinement for improved comfort and fit in more deviant cases are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape Design Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Comparison With Traditional Plaster Cast Socket Designs.\",\"authors\":\"Merel van der Stelt, Bo Berends, Marco Papenburg, Tom Langenhuyzen, Thomas Maal, Lars Brouwers, Guido de Jong, Ruud Leijendekkers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of creating an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to enhance prosthetic socket shapes for transtibial prostheses, aiming for a less operator-dependent, standardized approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study comprised 2 phases: first, developing an AI algorithm in a cross-sectional study to predict prosthetic socket shapes. Second, testing the AI-predicted digitally measured and standardized designed (DMSD) prosthetic socket against a manually measured and designed (MMD) prosthetic socket in a 2-week within-subject cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was done at the rehabilitation department of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The AI algorithm was developed using retrospective data from 116 patients from a Dutch orthopedic company, OIM Orthopedie, and tested on 10 randomly selected participants from Papenburg Orthopedie.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Utilization of an AI algorithm to enhance the shape of a transtibial prosthetic socket.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The algorithm was optimized to minimize the error in the test set. Participants' socket comfort score and fitting ratings from an independent physiotherapist and prosthetist were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predicted prosthetic shapes deviated by 2.51 mm from the actual designs. In total, 8 of 10 DMSD and all 10 MMD-prosthetic sockets were satisfactory for home testing. Participants rated DMSD-prosthetic sockets at 7.1 ± 2.2 (n=8) and MMD-prosthetic sockets at 6.6 ± 1.2 (n=10) on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates promising results for using an AI algorithm in prosthetic socket design, but long-term effectiveness and refinement for improved comfort and fit in more deviant cases are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape Design Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Comparison With Traditional Plaster Cast Socket Designs.
Objective: To investigate the feasibility of creating an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to enhance prosthetic socket shapes for transtibial prostheses, aiming for a less operator-dependent, standardized approach.
Design: The study comprised 2 phases: first, developing an AI algorithm in a cross-sectional study to predict prosthetic socket shapes. Second, testing the AI-predicted digitally measured and standardized designed (DMSD) prosthetic socket against a manually measured and designed (MMD) prosthetic socket in a 2-week within-subject cross-sectional study.
Setting: The study was done at the rehabilitation department of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Participants: The AI algorithm was developed using retrospective data from 116 patients from a Dutch orthopedic company, OIM Orthopedie, and tested on 10 randomly selected participants from Papenburg Orthopedie.
Interventions: Utilization of an AI algorithm to enhance the shape of a transtibial prosthetic socket.
Main outcome measures: The algorithm was optimized to minimize the error in the test set. Participants' socket comfort score and fitting ratings from an independent physiotherapist and prosthetist were collected.
Results: Predicted prosthetic shapes deviated by 2.51 mm from the actual designs. In total, 8 of 10 DMSD and all 10 MMD-prosthetic sockets were satisfactory for home testing. Participants rated DMSD-prosthetic sockets at 7.1 ± 2.2 (n=8) and MMD-prosthetic sockets at 6.6 ± 1.2 (n=10) on average.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates promising results for using an AI algorithm in prosthetic socket design, but long-term effectiveness and refinement for improved comfort and fit in more deviant cases are necessary.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.