开发用于预测老年败血症患者 28 天死亡率的临床评分;一项队列研究。

IF 2.9 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2269
Pitsucha Sanguanwit, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Jiraporn Khorana, Krongkarn Sutham, Yuranun Phootothum, Siriporn Damdin
{"title":"开发用于预测老年败血症患者 28 天死亡率的临床评分;一项队列研究。","authors":"Pitsucha Sanguanwit, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Jiraporn Khorana, Krongkarn Sutham, Yuranun Phootothum, Siriporn Damdin","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sepsis is a significant and common cause of death and burden among critically ill patients, which has increasing incidence and mortality in adults over 60 and advanced age. This study aimed to develop an easy-to-use clinical tool for assessing 28-day mortality risk in older sepsis patients upon their initial assessment in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of older (≥60 years) ED patients with suspected sepsis from August 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. A new prediction score was formulated based on the logistic coefficients of clinical predictors through multivariable regression analyses. Then, the score's screening performance was evaluated and compared to existing scoring systems; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), National early warning score (NEWS), and The Ramathibodi early warning score (REWS); using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AuROC).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study included 599 patients with the mean age of 77.13 (range: 60-101) years (56.43% male) and an overall 28-day mortality rate of 7.01%. The newly developed prediction score had seven independent predictors of 28-day mortality: malignancy, dependent status, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, consciousness, and lactate, which demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AuROC: 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82 - 0.92), significantly outperforming SIRS (AuROC: 0.62), qSOFA (AuROC: 0.72), NEWS (AuROC: 0.74), and REWS (AuROC: 0.71), all with p-values <0.01. The score allowed risk stratification into low-risk (positive likelihood ratio (LR+): 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24 - 0.58) and high-risk (LR+: 4.14, 95% CI: 3.14 - 5.44) groups with sensitivity of 69.0% and specificity of 83.3% at a cut-off point of 6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel prediction score demonstrates a remarkable ability to predict 28-day mortality risk in older sepsis patients during their initial ED assessment, offering potential for improved risk stratification and treatment guidance in older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Clinical Score for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Geriatric Sepsis Patients; a Cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Pitsucha Sanguanwit, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Jiraporn Khorana, Krongkarn Sutham, Yuranun Phootothum, Siriporn Damdin\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sepsis is a significant and common cause of death and burden among critically ill patients, which has increasing incidence and mortality in adults over 60 and advanced age. This study aimed to develop an easy-to-use clinical tool for assessing 28-day mortality risk in older sepsis patients upon their initial assessment in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of older (≥60 years) ED patients with suspected sepsis from August 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. A new prediction score was formulated based on the logistic coefficients of clinical predictors through multivariable regression analyses. Then, the score's screening performance was evaluated and compared to existing scoring systems; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), National early warning score (NEWS), and The Ramathibodi early warning score (REWS); using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AuROC).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study included 599 patients with the mean age of 77.13 (range: 60-101) years (56.43% male) and an overall 28-day mortality rate of 7.01%. The newly developed prediction score had seven independent predictors of 28-day mortality: malignancy, dependent status, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, consciousness, and lactate, which demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AuROC: 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82 - 0.92), significantly outperforming SIRS (AuROC: 0.62), qSOFA (AuROC: 0.72), NEWS (AuROC: 0.74), and REWS (AuROC: 0.71), all with p-values <0.01. The score allowed risk stratification into low-risk (positive likelihood ratio (LR+): 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24 - 0.58) and high-risk (LR+: 4.14, 95% CI: 3.14 - 5.44) groups with sensitivity of 69.0% and specificity of 83.3% at a cut-off point of 6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel prediction score demonstrates a remarkable ability to predict 28-day mortality risk in older sepsis patients during their initial ED assessment, offering potential for improved risk stratification and treatment guidance in older patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"e56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:败血症是危重病人死亡的一个重要且常见的原因,在 60 岁以上的成年人和高龄患者中发病率和死亡率不断上升。本研究旨在开发一种易于使用的临床工具,用于评估老年败血症患者在急诊科(ED)接受初步评估后 28 天内的死亡风险:利用 2018 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间老年(≥60 岁)疑似败血症 ED 患者的电子病历进行了一项回顾性队列研究。通过多变量回归分析,根据临床预测因子的逻辑系数制定了新的预测评分。然后,利用接收器操作特征曲线分析法(AuROC)对该评分的筛查性能进行了评估,并与现有评分系统(全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)、国家预警评分(NEWS)和拉马蒂博迪预警评分(REWS))进行了比较:研究共纳入 599 名患者,平均年龄为 77.13 岁(范围:60-101 岁)(56.43% 为男性),28 天总死亡率为 7.01%。新开发的预测评分有七个独立的 28 天死亡率预测因子:恶性肿瘤、依赖状态、心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、意识和乳酸,显示出极佳的判别能力(AuROC:0.87,95% 置信区间 (CI):0.82 - 0.92),明显优于 SIRS(AuROC:0.62)、qSOFA(AuROC:0.72)、NEWS(AuROC:0.74)和 REWS(AuROC:0.71),所有 p 值均为结论:新的预测评分显示了在 ED 初步评估期间预测老年败血症患者 28 天死亡风险的卓越能力,为改善老年患者的风险分层和治疗指导提供了可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Clinical Score for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Geriatric Sepsis Patients; a Cohort study.

Introduction: Sepsis is a significant and common cause of death and burden among critically ill patients, which has increasing incidence and mortality in adults over 60 and advanced age. This study aimed to develop an easy-to-use clinical tool for assessing 28-day mortality risk in older sepsis patients upon their initial assessment in the emergency department (ED).

Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of older (≥60 years) ED patients with suspected sepsis from August 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. A new prediction score was formulated based on the logistic coefficients of clinical predictors through multivariable regression analyses. Then, the score's screening performance was evaluated and compared to existing scoring systems; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), National early warning score (NEWS), and The Ramathibodi early warning score (REWS); using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AuROC).

Result: The study included 599 patients with the mean age of 77.13 (range: 60-101) years (56.43% male) and an overall 28-day mortality rate of 7.01%. The newly developed prediction score had seven independent predictors of 28-day mortality: malignancy, dependent status, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, consciousness, and lactate, which demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AuROC: 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82 - 0.92), significantly outperforming SIRS (AuROC: 0.62), qSOFA (AuROC: 0.72), NEWS (AuROC: 0.74), and REWS (AuROC: 0.71), all with p-values <0.01. The score allowed risk stratification into low-risk (positive likelihood ratio (LR+): 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24 - 0.58) and high-risk (LR+: 4.14, 95% CI: 3.14 - 5.44) groups with sensitivity of 69.0% and specificity of 83.3% at a cut-off point of 6.

Conclusion: The novel prediction score demonstrates a remarkable ability to predict 28-day mortality risk in older sepsis patients during their initial ED assessment, offering potential for improved risk stratification and treatment guidance in older patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信