{"title":"高流量鼻插管对老年急性呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的影响:预后风险因素分析。","authors":"Huili Chen, Meixue Huang, Songping Huang, Xiuyan Zhang, Biyu Wu","doi":"10.62347/URHG8462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical effects of high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and analyze prognostic factors following oxygen therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 200 ARF patients between January 2022 and June 2023, dividing them into an observation group (n=125) treated with HFNC, and a control group (n=75) receiving conventional oxygen therapy. We compared vital signs before and after treatment and categorized patients into good and poor prognosis groups to analyze demographic data and prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment, both groups showed improved vital signs, with the observation group experiencing significantly greater improvements (P<0.05). However, the observation group had a higher incidence of complications compared to controls (P=0.001). Patients with a history of endotracheal intubation or high APACHE II scores were more prevalent in the poor prognosis group (both P<0.05). Logistic regression identified the APACHE II score as a risk factor for poor prognosis, while HFNC emerged as a protective factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFNC is a safe and effective therapy that improves vital signs and alleviates hypoxia in elderly ARF patients. The APACHE II score and type of oxygen therapy are significant prognostic factors, with HFNC offering a protective effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"16 8","pages":"3510-3518"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of high-flow nasal cannulae on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure: a prognostic risk factor analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Huili Chen, Meixue Huang, Songping Huang, Xiuyan Zhang, Biyu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/URHG8462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical effects of high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and analyze prognostic factors following oxygen therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 200 ARF patients between January 2022 and June 2023, dividing them into an observation group (n=125) treated with HFNC, and a control group (n=75) receiving conventional oxygen therapy. We compared vital signs before and after treatment and categorized patients into good and poor prognosis groups to analyze demographic data and prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment, both groups showed improved vital signs, with the observation group experiencing significantly greater improvements (P<0.05). However, the observation group had a higher incidence of complications compared to controls (P=0.001). Patients with a history of endotracheal intubation or high APACHE II scores were more prevalent in the poor prognosis group (both P<0.05). Logistic regression identified the APACHE II score as a risk factor for poor prognosis, while HFNC emerged as a protective factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFNC is a safe and effective therapy that improves vital signs and alleviates hypoxia in elderly ARF patients. The APACHE II score and type of oxygen therapy are significant prognostic factors, with HFNC offering a protective effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"3510-3518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/URHG8462\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/URHG8462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨高流量鼻插管(HFNC)在老年急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者中的临床效果,并分析氧疗后的预后因素:我们在2022年1月至2023年6月期间招募了200名ARF患者,将其分为接受HFNC治疗的观察组(n=125)和接受常规氧疗的对照组(n=75)。我们比较了治疗前后的生命体征,并将患者分为预后良好组和预后不良组,分析人口统计学数据和预后因素:结果:治疗后,两组患者的生命体征均有所改善,其中观察组的改善幅度明显更大(结论:HFNC 是一种安全有效的治疗方法:HFNC 是一种安全有效的疗法,可改善老年 ARF 患者的生命体征并缓解缺氧。APACHE II 评分和氧疗类型是重要的预后因素,而 HFNC 具有保护作用。
Influence of high-flow nasal cannulae on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure: a prognostic risk factor analysis.
Objective: To explore the clinical effects of high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and analyze prognostic factors following oxygen therapy.
Methods: We enrolled 200 ARF patients between January 2022 and June 2023, dividing them into an observation group (n=125) treated with HFNC, and a control group (n=75) receiving conventional oxygen therapy. We compared vital signs before and after treatment and categorized patients into good and poor prognosis groups to analyze demographic data and prognostic factors.
Results: Post-treatment, both groups showed improved vital signs, with the observation group experiencing significantly greater improvements (P<0.05). However, the observation group had a higher incidence of complications compared to controls (P=0.001). Patients with a history of endotracheal intubation or high APACHE II scores were more prevalent in the poor prognosis group (both P<0.05). Logistic regression identified the APACHE II score as a risk factor for poor prognosis, while HFNC emerged as a protective factor.
Conclusions: HFNC is a safe and effective therapy that improves vital signs and alleviates hypoxia in elderly ARF patients. The APACHE II score and type of oxygen therapy are significant prognostic factors, with HFNC offering a protective effect.