下呼吸道感染病原体检测的下一代定向测序的有效性。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/FKWF4589
Hongfu Ma, Haixia Wang, Xiao Han, Jianwen Fei
{"title":"下呼吸道感染病原体检测的下一代定向测序的有效性。","authors":"Hongfu Ma, Haixia Wang, Xiao Han, Jianwen Fei","doi":"10.62347/FKWF4589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with lower respiratory tract infection in East Area of Yantai Yantaishan Hospital from December 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Sputum samples were tested using both tNGS technology and conventional microbiological examination. Data were collected on general clinical features and test outcomes. The study evaluated the efficacy of tNGS by comparing its positive detection rate against traditional methods and analyzing detection differences among patients with varying clinical characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both testing methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 281 patients were included, with corresponding sputum specimens. The tNGS method showed a higher positivity rate of 90.0%, significantly outperforming the conventional method's rate of 70.82% (P<0.05). Among 199 patients with concordant positive results, 38.22% fully agreed, while 53.40% completely disagreed between the two methods. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently detected pathogens, respectively. tNGS significantly reduced the time required for pathogen detection (P<0.001) and identified a higher rate of mixed infections compared to conventional methods (49.11% vs 2.85%, P<0.001). Positive tNGS detection rates significantly differed between patients with abnormal vs normal C-reactive protein or procalcitonin levels. The AUC for tNGS was 0.867, indicating superior diagnostic accuracy over the conventional method (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>tNGS technology demonstrates a high positivity rate and rapid pathogen detection in lower respiratory tract infections, with notable advantages in identifying mixed infections. This method shows potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of targeted next generation sequencing for pathogen detection in lower respiratory tract infections.\",\"authors\":\"Hongfu Ma, Haixia Wang, Xiao Han, Jianwen Fei\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/FKWF4589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with lower respiratory tract infection in East Area of Yantai Yantaishan Hospital from December 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Sputum samples were tested using both tNGS technology and conventional microbiological examination. Data were collected on general clinical features and test outcomes. The study evaluated the efficacy of tNGS by comparing its positive detection rate against traditional methods and analyzing detection differences among patients with varying clinical characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both testing methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 281 patients were included, with corresponding sputum specimens. The tNGS method showed a higher positivity rate of 90.0%, significantly outperforming the conventional method's rate of 70.82% (P<0.05). Among 199 patients with concordant positive results, 38.22% fully agreed, while 53.40% completely disagreed between the two methods. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently detected pathogens, respectively. tNGS significantly reduced the time required for pathogen detection (P<0.001) and identified a higher rate of mixed infections compared to conventional methods (49.11% vs 2.85%, P<0.001). Positive tNGS detection rates significantly differed between patients with abnormal vs normal C-reactive protein or procalcitonin levels. The AUC for tNGS was 0.867, indicating superior diagnostic accuracy over the conventional method (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>tNGS technology demonstrates a high positivity rate and rapid pathogen detection in lower respiratory tract infections, with notable advantages in identifying mixed infections. This method shows potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/FKWF4589\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/FKWF4589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究靶向新一代测序(tNGS)在诊断下呼吸道感染中的实用性:研究靶向新一代测序(tNGS)在下呼吸道感染诊断中的应用:回顾性分析 2021 年 12 月至 2023 年 9 月期间烟台市烟台山医院东区的下呼吸道感染患者。采用 tNGS 技术和传统微生物学检查对痰标本进行检测。研究收集了一般临床特征和检测结果的数据。研究通过比较 tNGS 与传统方法的阳性检出率,并分析不同临床特征患者的检出差异,评估了 tNGS 的功效。研究采用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析来确定两种检测方法的诊断准确性:结果:共纳入 281 名患者,并提供了相应的痰标本。tNGS方法的阳性率高达90.0%,明显优于传统方法的70.82%(PC结论:tNGS技术在下呼吸道感染中表现出较高的阳性率和快速的病原体检测能力,在识别混合感染方面具有显著优势。这种方法显示出提高诊断准确性和临床治疗决策的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of targeted next generation sequencing for pathogen detection in lower respiratory tract infections.

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections.

Methods: Patients with lower respiratory tract infection in East Area of Yantai Yantaishan Hospital from December 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Sputum samples were tested using both tNGS technology and conventional microbiological examination. Data were collected on general clinical features and test outcomes. The study evaluated the efficacy of tNGS by comparing its positive detection rate against traditional methods and analyzing detection differences among patients with varying clinical characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both testing methods.

Results: A total of 281 patients were included, with corresponding sputum specimens. The tNGS method showed a higher positivity rate of 90.0%, significantly outperforming the conventional method's rate of 70.82% (P<0.05). Among 199 patients with concordant positive results, 38.22% fully agreed, while 53.40% completely disagreed between the two methods. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently detected pathogens, respectively. tNGS significantly reduced the time required for pathogen detection (P<0.001) and identified a higher rate of mixed infections compared to conventional methods (49.11% vs 2.85%, P<0.001). Positive tNGS detection rates significantly differed between patients with abnormal vs normal C-reactive protein or procalcitonin levels. The AUC for tNGS was 0.867, indicating superior diagnostic accuracy over the conventional method (P<0.05).

Conclusions: tNGS technology demonstrates a high positivity rate and rapid pathogen detection in lower respiratory tract infections, with notable advantages in identifying mixed infections. This method shows potential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信