直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗心肌梗死后左心室血栓:一项 Meta 分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Christos Gogos MD , Vasileios Anastasiou MD , Andreas S. Papazoglou MD , Stylianos Daios MD , Matthaios Didagelos MD, PhD , Nikolaos Kamperidis MD, PhD , Vasileios Moschovidis MD , Spyridon Filippos Papadopoulos MD , Fotini Iatridi MD , Pantelis Sarafidis MD, PhD , George Giannakoulas MD, PhD , Vasileios Sachpekidis MD, PhD , Antonios Ziakas MD, PhD , Vasileios Kamperidis MD, PhD
{"title":"直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗心肌梗死后左心室血栓:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Christos Gogos MD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Anastasiou MD ,&nbsp;Andreas S. Papazoglou MD ,&nbsp;Stylianos Daios MD ,&nbsp;Matthaios Didagelos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kamperidis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Moschovidis MD ,&nbsp;Spyridon Filippos Papadopoulos MD ,&nbsp;Fotini Iatridi MD ,&nbsp;Pantelis Sarafidis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;George Giannakoulas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Sachpekidis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Antonios Ziakas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Kamperidis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation remains a post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complication even in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario is poorly defined. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus after AMI. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after AMI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included. DOACs were associated with an almost twofold higher likelihood of thrombus resolution compared with VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25 to 3.04], p = 0.003, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and decreased the risk of systemic embolism by 70% (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12 to 0.75]; p = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26 to 0.84], p = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk of reaching the composite outcome of safety and efficacy compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23 to 0.60], p &lt;0.0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). In conclusion, DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with VKAs for the management of LV thrombus related to AMI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Christos Gogos MD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Anastasiou MD ,&nbsp;Andreas S. Papazoglou MD ,&nbsp;Stylianos Daios MD ,&nbsp;Matthaios Didagelos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kamperidis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Moschovidis MD ,&nbsp;Spyridon Filippos Papadopoulos MD ,&nbsp;Fotini Iatridi MD ,&nbsp;Pantelis Sarafidis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;George Giannakoulas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Sachpekidis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Antonios Ziakas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vasileios Kamperidis MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation remains a post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complication even in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario is poorly defined. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus after AMI. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after AMI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included. DOACs were associated with an almost twofold higher likelihood of thrombus resolution compared with VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25 to 3.04], p = 0.003, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and decreased the risk of systemic embolism by 70% (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12 to 0.75]; p = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26 to 0.84], p = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk of reaching the composite outcome of safety and efficacy compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23 to 0.60], p &lt;0.0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). In conclusion, DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with VKAs for the management of LV thrombus related to AMI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924006866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924006866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在早期再灌注的现代,左心室血栓形成仍是急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的并发症之一。这种临床情况下的最佳抗凝方案尚不明确。本荟萃分析旨在研究直接口服抗凝药(DOACs)与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKAs)相比,在治疗急性心肌梗死后左心室血栓方面的疗效和安全性。我们在电子数据库中进行了系统性文献综述,以确定报告急性心肌梗死后左心室血栓患者使用 DOACs 与 VKAs 的疗效和安全性结果数据的研究。研究人员计算了比值比 (OR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI),并进行了随机效应荟萃分析以综合汇总比值比。八项研究共纳入了 605 名患者。与 VKAs 相比,DOACs 可使血栓溶解的可能性增加近 2 倍(汇总 OR 1.95 [1.25-3.04];P =0.003,I2 =0%),并可将全身性栓塞的风险降低 70%(汇总 OR 0.30 [0.12-0.75];P =0.01,I2 =0%)。与 VKAs 相比,使用 DOACs 可将出血风险降低 54%(汇总 OR 0.46 [0.26-0.84];P =0.01,I2 =0%)。总体而言,与使用 VKAs 的患者相比,接受 DOACs 的患者达到安全性和有效性综合结果的风险降低了 63%(汇总 OR 0.37 [0.23-0.60];P 2 =0%)。总之,在治疗急性心肌梗死相关左心室血栓时,DOACs 的疗效和安全性似乎比 VKAs 更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis
Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation remains a post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complication even in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario is poorly defined. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus after AMI. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after AMI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included. DOACs were associated with an almost twofold higher likelihood of thrombus resolution compared with VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25 to 3.04], p = 0.003, I2 = 0%), and decreased the risk of systemic embolism by 70% (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12 to 0.75]; p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26 to 0.84], p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk of reaching the composite outcome of safety and efficacy compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23 to 0.60], p <0.0001, I2 = 0%). In conclusion, DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with VKAs for the management of LV thrombus related to AMI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信