Florian A Michael, Michael Jung, Mike Reimers, Clara Oschwald, Ulrike Mihm, Christoph Welsch, Dirk Walter, Fabian Finkelmeier, Johannes Masseli, Anita Pathil, Georg Dultz, Danuta Puhlmann, Laura Diaz-Martinez, Daniel Hack, Neelam Lingwal, Jörg Bojunga, Volkhard A J Kempf, Stefan Zeuzem, Mireen Friedrich-Rust
{"title":"通过层流和湍流气流干燥热可塑性柔性内窥镜通道的新方法--一项前瞻性、随机对照、单中心、概念验证试验。","authors":"Florian A Michael, Michael Jung, Mike Reimers, Clara Oschwald, Ulrike Mihm, Christoph Welsch, Dirk Walter, Fabian Finkelmeier, Johannes Masseli, Anita Pathil, Georg Dultz, Danuta Puhlmann, Laura Diaz-Martinez, Daniel Hack, Neelam Lingwal, Jörg Bojunga, Volkhard A J Kempf, Stefan Zeuzem, Mireen Friedrich-Rust","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>International guidelines suggest different possibilities for drying of endoscopes during reprocessing. Clinical results of these available drying methods are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the drying cycle of a standard endoscope washer-disinfector (EWD) (standard drying method [SD]) with a shortened mandatory drying by the EWD followed by a special drying device using laminar and turbulent air flow (novel drying method [ND]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty endoscopes (duodenoscopes, colonoscocopes, and gastroscopes) from 3 different manufacturers underwent high-level disinfection and drying depending on the randomization group. Operational time of drying was measured for both groups. Residual fluid in the channels was measured using a laboratory scale. After a 14-day storage period, a sample of the endoscope channels was obtained to determine bacterial contamination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ND had significantly fewer residual water in endoscope channels (SD: 90% vs ND: 0%; P < 0.001) after high-level disinfection and drying and less bacterial contamination after storage for 14 days (SD: 47% vs ND: 20%; P = 0.028). Time consumed for drying in ND was also significantly shorter (SD: 16 minutes 4 seconds vs ND: 5 minutes 59 seconds; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Drying with a special automatic drying device was superior compared with an EWD's drying program as evidenced by no measurable residual water, reduced microbiological contamination, and a more than 2-fold decrease in operational time. Thus, drying by laminar and turbulent airflow may represent an attractive alternative to the currently used standard approach in the reprocessing process of flexible endoscopes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1027-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Drying Method of Thermolabile Flexible Endoscope Channels by Laminar and Turbulent Airflow: A Prospective, Randomized-Controlled, Single-Center, Proof-of-Concept Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Florian A Michael, Michael Jung, Mike Reimers, Clara Oschwald, Ulrike Mihm, Christoph Welsch, Dirk Walter, Fabian Finkelmeier, Johannes Masseli, Anita Pathil, Georg Dultz, Danuta Puhlmann, Laura Diaz-Martinez, Daniel Hack, Neelam Lingwal, Jörg Bojunga, Volkhard A J Kempf, Stefan Zeuzem, Mireen Friedrich-Rust\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>International guidelines suggest different possibilities for drying of endoscopes during reprocessing. Clinical results of these available drying methods are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the drying cycle of a standard endoscope washer-disinfector (EWD) (standard drying method [SD]) with a shortened mandatory drying by the EWD followed by a special drying device using laminar and turbulent air flow (novel drying method [ND]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty endoscopes (duodenoscopes, colonoscocopes, and gastroscopes) from 3 different manufacturers underwent high-level disinfection and drying depending on the randomization group. Operational time of drying was measured for both groups. Residual fluid in the channels was measured using a laboratory scale. After a 14-day storage period, a sample of the endoscope channels was obtained to determine bacterial contamination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ND had significantly fewer residual water in endoscope channels (SD: 90% vs ND: 0%; P < 0.001) after high-level disinfection and drying and less bacterial contamination after storage for 14 days (SD: 47% vs ND: 20%; P = 0.028). Time consumed for drying in ND was also significantly shorter (SD: 16 minutes 4 seconds vs ND: 5 minutes 59 seconds; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Drying with a special automatic drying device was superior compared with an EWD's drying program as evidenced by no measurable residual water, reduced microbiological contamination, and a more than 2-fold decrease in operational time. Thus, drying by laminar and turbulent airflow may represent an attractive alternative to the currently used standard approach in the reprocessing process of flexible endoscopes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1027-1035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:国际指南提出了在再处理过程中干燥内窥镜的各种可能性。这些现有干燥方法的临床效果并不令人满意。本研究的目的是比较标准内窥镜清洗消毒器(EWD)的干燥周期(标准干燥法 [SD])和缩短的强制干燥法(EWD,然后使用层流和湍流气流的特殊干燥装置,新型干燥法 [ND]):根据随机分组,对来自三个不同制造商的 60 个内窥镜(十二指肠镜、结肠镜和胃镜)进行高水平消毒和干燥。对两组的干燥操作时间进行了测量。使用实验室刻度测量通道中的残留液体。储存 14 天后,采集内窥镜通道样本以确定细菌污染情况:结果:经过高水平消毒和干燥后,ND 组内窥镜通道中的残留水明显较少(SD:90% vs ND:0%;p < 0.001),存储 14 天后的细菌污染也较少(SD:47% vs ND:20%;p = 0.028)。玖龙纸业的干燥时间也明显较短(标清:16 分 4 秒 vs 玖龙纸业:5 分 59 秒;p < 0.001):结论:使用特殊自动干燥装置进行干燥比使用 EWD 的干燥程序更有优势,这体现在没有可测量的残留水分、微生物污染减少以及操作时间减少了两倍多。因此,在柔性内窥镜的再处理过程中,用层流和湍流气流进行干燥可能是目前使用的标准方法的一种有吸引力的替代方法。
A New Drying Method of Thermolabile Flexible Endoscope Channels by Laminar and Turbulent Airflow: A Prospective, Randomized-Controlled, Single-Center, Proof-of-Concept Trial.
Introduction: International guidelines suggest different possibilities for drying of endoscopes during reprocessing. Clinical results of these available drying methods are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the drying cycle of a standard endoscope washer-disinfector (EWD) (standard drying method [SD]) with a shortened mandatory drying by the EWD followed by a special drying device using laminar and turbulent air flow (novel drying method [ND]).
Methods: Sixty endoscopes (duodenoscopes, colonoscocopes, and gastroscopes) from 3 different manufacturers underwent high-level disinfection and drying depending on the randomization group. Operational time of drying was measured for both groups. Residual fluid in the channels was measured using a laboratory scale. After a 14-day storage period, a sample of the endoscope channels was obtained to determine bacterial contamination.
Results: ND had significantly fewer residual water in endoscope channels (SD: 90% vs ND: 0%; P < 0.001) after high-level disinfection and drying and less bacterial contamination after storage for 14 days (SD: 47% vs ND: 20%; P = 0.028). Time consumed for drying in ND was also significantly shorter (SD: 16 minutes 4 seconds vs ND: 5 minutes 59 seconds; P < 0.001).
Discussion: Drying with a special automatic drying device was superior compared with an EWD's drying program as evidenced by no measurable residual water, reduced microbiological contamination, and a more than 2-fold decrease in operational time. Thus, drying by laminar and turbulent airflow may represent an attractive alternative to the currently used standard approach in the reprocessing process of flexible endoscopes.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.