[非大学教学医院前列腺癌根治术后的长期肿瘤学结果]。

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Aktuelle Urologie Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1055/a-2377-9339
Konstantinos Drosos, Karsten Fischer, Ines Hofmann, Tilmann Kälble
{"title":"[非大学教学医院前列腺癌根治术后的长期肿瘤学结果]。","authors":"Konstantinos Drosos, Karsten Fischer, Ines Hofmann, Tilmann Kälble","doi":"10.1055/a-2377-9339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a major component of quality control in prostate cancer (PCa) centres.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the oncological outcomes after RP in a non-university teaching hospital and compare them with other high-volume PCa centres.</p><p><strong>Material und methods: </strong>This study included 1,161 patients after RP who were divided into two risk groups. Low-risk: localised PCa (pT2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)≤ 20 ng/ml, Gleason score (GS) 6-7b and pN0. High-risk: locally advanced PCa (≥pT3a) and/or PSA >20 ng/ml and/or GS≥ 8 and/or pN1. Risk groups and clinicopathological features were correlated to biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) und overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10-year BCR-free survival, CSS und OS were 68.4%, 47.0% and 100% in the low-risk group and 87.4%, 89.0% and 73.9% in the high-risk group, respectively; the outcomes between risk groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. GS was the most significant prognostic factor for CSS (p=0.00001) und BCR-free survival (p=0.00036). Nodal involvement (pN1) was strongly associated with CSS (p=0.00004). Age was the most important factor for overall survival in the high-risk group (p=0.0011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RP could be a curative treatment option for advanced PCa in selected cases. GS is the most important prognostic factor. Good oncological outcomes can also be achieved in non-university teaching hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7513,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a non-university teaching hospital].\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Drosos, Karsten Fischer, Ines Hofmann, Tilmann Kälble\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2377-9339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a major component of quality control in prostate cancer (PCa) centres.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the oncological outcomes after RP in a non-university teaching hospital and compare them with other high-volume PCa centres.</p><p><strong>Material und methods: </strong>This study included 1,161 patients after RP who were divided into two risk groups. Low-risk: localised PCa (pT2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)≤ 20 ng/ml, Gleason score (GS) 6-7b and pN0. High-risk: locally advanced PCa (≥pT3a) and/or PSA >20 ng/ml and/or GS≥ 8 and/or pN1. Risk groups and clinicopathological features were correlated to biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) und overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10-year BCR-free survival, CSS und OS were 68.4%, 47.0% and 100% in the low-risk group and 87.4%, 89.0% and 73.9% in the high-risk group, respectively; the outcomes between risk groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. GS was the most significant prognostic factor for CSS (p=0.00001) und BCR-free survival (p=0.00036). Nodal involvement (pN1) was strongly associated with CSS (p=0.00004). Age was the most important factor for overall survival in the high-risk group (p=0.0011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RP could be a curative treatment option for advanced PCa in selected cases. GS is the most important prognostic factor. Good oncological outcomes can also be achieved in non-university teaching hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aktuelle Urologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aktuelle Urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2377-9339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2377-9339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌根治术(RP)后的肿瘤治疗效果评估是前列腺癌中心质量控制的重要组成部分:对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的肿瘤治疗效果进行评估是前列腺癌(PCa)中心质量控制的重要组成部分:评估一家非大学教学医院前列腺癌根治术后的肿瘤治疗效果,并将其与其他治疗量大的前列腺癌中心进行比较:本研究纳入了 1,161 名接受 RP 术的患者,他们被分为两个风险组。低风险组:局部 PCa(pT2),前列腺特异抗原(PSA)≤ 20 ng/ml,格里森评分(GS)6-7b,pN0。高危:局部晚期PCa(≥pT3a)和/或PSA>20 ng/ml和/或GS≥8和/或pN1。风险组别和临床病理特征与无生化复发生存率(BCR)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)相关:结果:低风险组的10年无生化复发生存率、CSS和OS分别为68.4%、47.0%和100%,高风险组分别为87.4%、89.0%和73.9%;各风险组之间的结果差异有统计学意义(p结论:RP可作为一种根治性治疗方法:在某些情况下,RP 可作为晚期 PCa 的根治性治疗方案。GS是最重要的预后因素。非大学教学医院也能取得良好的肿瘤治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a non-university teaching hospital].

Background: The evaluation of oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a major component of quality control in prostate cancer (PCa) centres.

Objectives: To evaluate the oncological outcomes after RP in a non-university teaching hospital and compare them with other high-volume PCa centres.

Material und methods: This study included 1,161 patients after RP who were divided into two risk groups. Low-risk: localised PCa (pT2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)≤ 20 ng/ml, Gleason score (GS) 6-7b and pN0. High-risk: locally advanced PCa (≥pT3a) and/or PSA >20 ng/ml and/or GS≥ 8 and/or pN1. Risk groups and clinicopathological features were correlated to biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) und overall survival (OS).

Results: The 10-year BCR-free survival, CSS und OS were 68.4%, 47.0% and 100% in the low-risk group and 87.4%, 89.0% and 73.9% in the high-risk group, respectively; the outcomes between risk groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. GS was the most significant prognostic factor for CSS (p=0.00001) und BCR-free survival (p=0.00036). Nodal involvement (pN1) was strongly associated with CSS (p=0.00004). Age was the most important factor for overall survival in the high-risk group (p=0.0011).

Conclusions: RP could be a curative treatment option for advanced PCa in selected cases. GS is the most important prognostic factor. Good oncological outcomes can also be achieved in non-university teaching hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aktuelle Urologie
Aktuelle Urologie 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung – für Sie auf den Punkt zusammengefasst und kritisch kommentiert Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis Auf dem Laufenden über die klinische Forschung durch interessante Originalien CME-Punkte sammeln mit der Rubrik "Operative Techniken" In jeder Ausgabe: Techniken wichtiger Standard-OPs – Schritt für Schritt Erstklassige OP-Skizzen mit verständlichen Erläuterungen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信